The Dick Burns Homepage

[Chimp!] [Rants!] [Murder!]


 

The Fin de Ciecle and the Absurd: The "Literature" of William Garner


by

Umberto Chomsky (Dr., Dr., Mr. M.D.)



Mommy, mommy, why did you never love me?

-Tacitus, The Histories

When the sum of twentieth century vengeance literature is examined by semiologists yet unborn, William Garner's vanguard work in the arena of "magic surrealism" will surely be regarded as having played a pivotal role in the devolution of the absurdist anarchomystery. Garner's private detective/sexual deviant/Judas figure Dick Burns traces his origins back to early post-L.A. Chandler and late pre-AA Thompson and, indeed, Euripides himself from his tragic "brown period." Part avenging angel, part psychopath, part faith healer, Burns represents the locus of corrupted western experience in post-Vietnam American society: to wit, Burns is both victim, torturer and, some would claim, even the big black metal thing used to inflict pain on the helpless screaming victim. This is not to say that Burns is anything less than a brain-damaged pervert with a badge, a bottle of rye, and an account at Smith & Wesson, but to imply that his influence on writers of this embryonic (some would say abortive) genre was nothing more than "giving the peanut gallery something to laugh at while pinching a loaf" would be less than kind but more than appropriate.

When taken as a whole, the stories collected in this anthology can be considered as an vast and heartfelt confessional on par with St. Augustine's or even Charles Manson's. Opening with the sparse but harrowing "Nobody to Kill," progressing through the gut-wrenching "Lead Valentines for Wang" and closing with the playfully enigmatic "The Pier," these fragments of postmodern decadence both reassure and challenge the fundamental moral climate of post-Reagan America. Specifically, Burns plays the judge-jury-victim-perpetrator-executioner-janitor in a world where Justice is absent, or at least out playing fisties with the defense team. Behind Burns's subtle facade lies a seething, fetid, undulating mass of contradictions, absurdities, red herrings and emotional blind alleys where literary critics and myopic college professors for the next hundred years will find many an excuse to write masturbatory commentaries and, in general, give themselves an excuse to remain tenured.

However, Dick Burns's existence cannot be reduced to a wrathful manifestation of the collective unconscious of a public anesthetized by a narcotic media and fed a steady diet of corporate media half-truths and governmental propaganda mill pabulum. If he were, his exploits would fall by the wayside like so many freshly cut suburban lawn clippings on the chalk-scarred sidewalk of Western Literature. William Garner's protean style effectively transcends such outmoded constraints as "taste," "plot" and even "human dignity." The true depth of Burns's psyche can only be appreciated when the reader enters what I term "Burns consciousness." This state of mind is achieved when the reader has undergone sleep deprivation for at least 72 hours; consumed excessive amounts of caffeine, alcohol and nicotine; and watched Buttman's Mexican Holiday1 until climaxing. The resulting emotional and physical exhaustion, coupled with the rampant auditory hallucinations provide a unique opportunity to experience the Burns world: a world where international cabals fight for control of dwindling natural resources; shady, centuries-old conspiracies abound with the regularity of tampon commercials, and the mighty Potomac River is perennially clogged with the dismembered trunks of men in their late forties.

The most vivid example of this unique brand of existentialist humor is found in the aptly titled "Revenge of the Anarcholesbian Epidemiologist." On its surface, this vignette can be taken as a simple morality tale of rogue intelligence operative implicated in a series of brutal but hilarious murder/suicides2. On another level, when the reader examines it through a "Burns consciousness" perspective, the complicated matrix of sexual deviancy, repressed Oedipal desires, and animal husbandry weave a tragic tapestry of self-delusion and, ultimately, self-defeat. To paraphrase Stephen Daedelus, Burns " is the hornmad Iago that the Moor in him should suffer."3 Not only does he succeed in apprehending the crazed lesbian warrior poet responsible for the atrocities, but he also gets a free Slurpee for his efforts.

On the other emotional extreme, the "The Pier" serves as an appropriate coda to the series. Functioning almost plagiaristically like Joyce's "The Dead" from Dubliners, this tale of murder, retribution, self-loathing and self-abuse has few precedents in the Western Canon of pale penis people literature, with the possible exception of Heidi. The final emotionally-charged image of the tale presents us with the self-actualized Dick Burns, stripped of all his petty hatreds, blind prejudices and juvenile fart/pee humor: a detective wearing nothing but a pair of wax lips, dances on a snow-covered pier, humming the theme from La Traviatta. Truly the reductio ad absurdum of Euro-centric society at the closing of the millennium.

Should we accept Burns as simply a morally ambiguous drug addict on par with Sherlock Holmes and Bob Packwood? Should we leave him behind with all the other wretched excesses of '80s consumerism? Fortunately for his readership, the vox populi has spoken: William Garner's second posthumous collection of limericks has entered the New York Review of Books with a bullet.

Dick Burns would be proud.


1 See The Adult Video Catalog, Leisure Time Products, 1993.

2 A genetically engineered virus forces its victims to slam their heads against cement walls. Shades of Ayn Rand?

3 Ulysses, pp. 478-479.



The Dick Burns Homepage

[Chimp!] [Rants!] [Murder!]