Today there are literally thousands of highly reputable scientists representing every scientific discipline who are Biblical creationists….
Many of today’s most distinguished scientists completely dismiss the concept of organic evolution in favor of Biblical creationism…. [Deleted reference to a industrial non-biologist.]
[Deleted two dead (and dead when he wrote the book) non-biologists including a reference to a “Nobel Peace Prize in science” that does not exist or for that matter make sense.]
Dr. Etheridge, world-famous paleontologist of the British Museum, has remarked:
Dr. Albert Fleischmann, of the University of Erlangen,
Many other highly distinguished scientists of our day could be quoted who completely reject the evolutionary philosophy….
[Bold print is mine emphasis.]
Huse is clearly saying that Dr. Etheridge and Albert Fleischmann are distinguished and contemporary scientists. This is false.
First let us deal with Dr. Etheridge. As has been pointed out on the talk.origins newsgroup, the his use of the term “transmutation of species.” gives away that this is a quote from the 19th century. Indeed this quote got wide circulation in the 1920s. Ronald L. Numbers1 discussed the use of quote in the evolution/creationism controversies in the 19th century:
The widely touted “Dr. Etheridge, of the British Museum,” who always appeared in creationist literature without a given name, was quoted by Townsend as saying, “In all this great museum there is not a particle of evidence transmutation of species. Nine-tenths of the talk of evolution is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by fact. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views.” The content of Etheridge’s statement varied from work to work, and its source remained unidentified, except for Alexander Patterson’s comment that Etheridge was answering a question put to him by a Dr. George E. Post. When curious parties in the 1920s inquired about the identity of Etheridge, the director of the British Museum surmised that the man in question was “Robert Etheridge, Junr., who was Assistant Keeper of Geology in this Museum from 1881 to 1891,” at which time he left for Australia, where he died in 1920. The director hastened to add that “Mr. Etheridge’s opinion on this subject should not be considered as in any way representing scientific opinion in this Museum.”
Thus instead of a contemporary distinguished scientists doubting evolution we have an obscure nineteenth century figure that never had any fame at all. In short the creationists have been dishonest in their presentation of the quote.
Numbers2 also dealt with Fleischmann:
This one lone biologist identified by Poteat was Albert Fleischmann (1862-1942), a reputable but relatively obscure German zoologist who taught for decades at the University of Erlangen in Bavaria. In 1901 he published a scientific critique of organic evolution, Die Descendenz-theorie, in which he rejected not only Darwinism but all theories of common organic descent. This placed him in a unique position among biologists. As Kellogg noted in 1907, Fleischmann seemed to be “the only biologist of recognised position … who publicly declared a disbelief in the theory of descent.” The German creationist apparently remained of the same mind for the rest of his life. In 1933, the year of his retirement from Erlangen, he presented a paper to the Victoria Institute in London in which he dismissed the notion of a “genelogical tree” as a “fascinating dream.” “No one can demonstrate that the limits of species have ever been passed,” he asserted. “These are the Rubicons which evolutionists cannot cross.” In his declining years Fleischmann informed English acquaintances that he was writing a book “that will wipe evolution off the slate,” but the work never appeared.
So instead of a contemporary biologist Huse implied, we have an obscure and long-dead biologist.
Many creationist web site on the web are misusing these quotes:
A creationist calling himself “Harry” plagiarized word-for-word some of Huse’s book including the two quotes question on this feedback page for the Talk.Origins Archive.
| 1. | Ronald L. Numbers. The Creationists: The Evolution of Scientific Creationism. Berkeley: The University of California Press. 1992. P. 52. |
| 2. | Ibid. |