Last modified by cpheph1 on: 

2006 salary cap

previous 2006 cap number

Notes and thoughts...

 

9/29/2006 8:33PM:  The most recent update by the media regarding the Packers' total available cap space was ~$7.5 million on 22 Sept.    I think the media figure of $7.5 million included the full cap hits for Adrian Klemm and Mike Hawkins and not their injury settlement amounts (neither player is in the NFLPA base salary database).  Additionally, Will Whitticker reportedly received an injury settlement also.  ...and of course, since the media update, Tracy White was cut and Brandon Miree was signed (but y'all are well aware of by now).  Hopefully, the media will eventually report the injury settlement amounts.  In the mean time, I've made WAGs on the amounts.

9/4/2006 1:57PM:  The final roster probably will undergo some tweaks here and there over the next few weeks but, as it stands, they've got 53 plus seven on IR and four on the practice squad that count against the salary cap.  Additionally, there are 18 guys no-longer with the team that also count.  I haven't seen anything in the media the last few days for team total so I'm not sure how far off my estimated available cap space is but I have them at $8,017,711.

No real shockers with the final cuts but I thought they'd keep Jason Horton. Only 10 players originally acquired during GM Mike Sherman's tenure remain with the team.  The influx of young players (17 rookie/1st year & 10 2nd year) clearly indicates to me Ted Thompson is rebuilding the roster the way he wants (i.e., via the draft).  I'm not amazed by it but never thought I'd be saying "the Packers are rebuilding" while Brett was still around...

I'm not sure what to expect this year...  I believe they have some good/very-good players.  However, the lack of experience could very well mean another losing season...but who knows, maybe things will fall into place and they'll have a winning record and possibly win the division.  Stranger things have happened.  Nothing is real until it happens... As always, I'll take the glass half-full approach.  I'm hopeful the Packers will do well this year (~9-7 and division crown) but won't be crushed if they don't.

10:09 PM 8/6/2006:  I think discovered the difference with the (below) JSO cap number: 

  1. I'm now using the adjusted cap figure of $1,954,000 instead of $1,968,071
  2. Bubba Franks' prorated signing bonus is $1,000,000 instead of $1,400,000
  3. I adjusted my projected off-season workout bonus total to $212,310

Those three adjustments reconciled the difference I had with the $7.751m figure.  Of course, since then, Todd Williams' cap number has been added into the mix.  $7,713,200 appears to be the number...

10:02 PM 8/3/2006:  I received an e-mail from a friend letting me know that JSO had a new article that had the "available cap space" number of $7.751m.  However, I'm unable to reconcile with that number.  Thus, I have a difference of $442,329.  I'm pretty sure the JSO number does not include recently signed Todd Williams but there still is a discrepancy somewhere...which I cannot resolve without full access to NFLPA salary data (which I obviously do not have).  Additionally, I'm projecting $230,910 for off-season workout bonus money paid...which could be way off the mark.  Plus I'm using a slightly higher adjusted cap number than what JSO reports.

Based on the JSO article I've adjusted cap numbers for the following:  Charles Woodson, Terrence Murphy, Kevin Barry, and Adrian Klemm.  Also, the JSO article has a link which enabled me to reconcile cap numbers for Kenderick Allen, Ahman Green, Kenny Peterson, Jason Horton, and Cullen Jenkins (they received off-season workout bonus amounts which I've subtracted from my previous projection total of $257,400).

Regardless of my discrepancy with the JSO number, it's obvious the Packers Salary Cap is in great shape.

10:13 PM 8/2/2006:  Back from my extended break... All the draft picks are signed and training camp has started so that's exciting!  The total cap values for the drafted rookies was published by JSO on 1 Aug.   Not sure how far off my "available cap space" number is.  The last media report by JSO was $10.721m under on 19 July but that was before "The Hawk" landed and several other signings (Hodge, Jennings, Colledge, Spitz, Martin, Rogers, plus vets Peko and Todd Williams).  Regardless how far off my number is, there's no doubt the Packers have lots of cap room remaining...and I'm sure they'll eventually use it all at some point this season (contract extensions, signing injury replacements, "carry-forward" LTBE, etc.).  Who knows, maybe TT will pull the trigger and trade for Jerry Porter or Ashley Lelie...but not at their current asking price.

11:56 PM 6/10/2006: On 21 May, I had the Packers at $3,666,474 under...I've been away from the computer since then and a few things have happened...Barry got hurt [I'm considering him essentially on IR at this point] and today (or yesterday) Donnell Washington was cut. WRT to Donnell, I'm not surprised but thought he'd at least make it to training camp. He will count at least $177k+ in dead cap for 2006 and his remaining PRSB [$177,500] hits 2007...$3,582,474 is the current WAG for available space after the transactions.  NFI why Mark Roman is still on the roster but I expect him to be released ASAP.

Sounds like the OTAs are going OK but I can't wait to see them in pads...especially the LBs.  Maybe they'll even be able to use a 3-3-5 defense with AJ, Nick, and Brady at LB in some specialty packages.  A few players are non-volunteers but just because Al Harris is a no-show doesn't mean the media needs to spin it into new contract demands and a potential hold-out...yet they feel they must.

12:21 PM 5/30/2006: From wsj: "Can Colledge and Coston replace last year's guards? They can't be any worse, but it's doubtful they'll be any better, either. At least not right away." [/excerpt]

Wow... '...it's doubtful they'll be any better, either. At least not right away.' ...well, I don't quite agree with that statement. I think the Packers could very well have a good tandem, and interior OL for that matter, with Colledge and Coston. It's a bummer for KB though...hurts the OL depth too. However, it creates an opportunity for Tony Moll.

As the No. 5 pick, Hawk's deal will exceed the five-year, $19.1 million contract signed by the fifth pick in 2005, running back Carnell Williams of Tampa Bay. Williams received $11.65 million in his first year, including a signing bonus of $2.9 million, an option bonus of $5 million, $1.75 million in base salary and roster bonus, and $2 million in easily earned incentives.

AJ Hawk certainly will get a rich contract...I have NFI how rich, but he will be paid a pretty penny.

A friend of mine, Chris R, has a few podcasts  he's done that '600 unique' downloaders go there each month.

Now that KB will most likely be placed on IR, I wonder if the Packers will revisit with Ross 'The Boss' Verba?... I would, and hopefully TT reconsiders it...

12:10 PM 5/20/2006:  [JSO Insider] "Could history repeat itself this year?"
"
The Packers don't have a rising star at quarterback or anyone on defense to compare to White. And they shorted themselves on draft picks from 2002 through 2004. Therefore, some of their young players might not hold as much promise as some of those from 11 years ago. But, again, if there's any chance of it, those who are perhaps most likely to play a leading role are the Packers' untapped young veterans, more so than this year's free agents and draft picks."

No, the Packers don't have a 'rising star at QB unless you consider Aaron Rogers to be one...but what a bummer, they've got a first ballot HOFer still playing QB. C'mon Cliff!...or are you going to spew BS about Brett possibly 'losing it' over-night? For all we know, Brett could add to his NFL record MVP trophy case.

Obviously the Packers have not come close to replacing Reggie...IMO, he was a once-in-a-lifetime player...as is Brett. However, I like the team defensive concept they're evolving to plus the current players they have to execute it. They have *multiple* defensive playmakers or at least guys capable of it.

I agree with Cliff WRT on the "Packers' untapped young veterans" needing to step-up. I certainly don't know how many will step-up or how many they need to do so but I believe some, maybe several, will [e.g., Cullen Jenkins, Marquand Manuel, Ahmad Carroll, etc. (obviously OLmen)].

Overall, is was interesting commentary by Cliff.

8:59 PM 5/17/2006:  Here's a different spin, from a total cap space perspective, on the defense...and who they'll likely keep.  Not sure if they'll keep 24 or 25 defenders though.   

     I've racked'n'stacked the safeties/CBs based on the following article:
http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=423626
SAFETIES[4/5/6]
STRONG SAFETIES
*22 Marquand Manuel 6-0 209 (TotalCapValue[TCV] - $1.76m)
*25 Marviel Underwood 5-10 197 (TCV - $457,500)
Atari Bigby 5-11 211 [*~PS] (TCV - $275k)
20 Mark Roman 5-11 201 (TCV - $975k)
FREE SAFETIES
*36 Nick Collins 5-11 200 (TCV - $730k)
*29 Tyrone Culver 6-1 200 (TCV - $275+k)
24 Tra Boger 5-11 210 [*~PS] (TCV - $~275k)
38 Jeremy Thornburg 6-0 196 [~PS] (TCV - $350+k)
CORNERBACKS[5/6 - 1PS]
*21 Charles Woodson 6-1 208 (TCV - $6,575,997)
*31 Al Harris 6-1 185 (TCV - $3.375m)
*28 Ahmad Carroll 5-10 190 (TCV - $1,410,500)
*27 Will Blackmon 6-0 198 (TCV - $$275+k)
*37 Mike Hawkins 6-1 180 (TCV - $386+k)
-
26 Jason Horton 6-0 190 (TCV - $425+k)
39 Therrian Fontenot 5-11 187 [~PS] (TCV - $275k)
41 Jerron Wishom 6-0 197 [~PS] (TCV - $350+k)
34 Patrick Dendy 6-0 190 [~PS] (TCV - $350+k)
Keeping 11 total DBs would be an extreme but based on potential athleticism and ST deployment, DB is a prime position to have. Whether it's the most important defensive position, or not, is an entirely different theme park... Almost all of the 'DB fence-riders' intrigue me to a certain degree but Bigby and Boger are the most intriguing [for the 11 DB concept]. With the young guys they cut, the Packers should have at least 2/3 they target for the PS. Total 2006 cap value for *9-DBs* = ~$15,244,997+

      Linebackers[6] total cap: $3,789,476 for known cap amounts...then there's AJ & Abdul. I've seen guesstimates where AJ will count $2+m and I'm guessing Abdul will be ~$600k so LBs will run to the tune of ~$6m total cap

http://www.drafthistory.com/positions/lb.html
2006 1 1 5 5 A.J. Hawk Packers Ohio State
2 1 9 9 Ernie Sims Lions Florida State
3 1 17 17 Chad Greenway Vikings Iowa
4 1 18 18 Bobby Carpenter Cowboys Ohio State
5 1 22 22 Manny Lawson 49ers North Carolina State
6 2 1 33 DeMeco Ryans Texans Alabama
7 2 2 34 D'Qwell Jackson Browns Maryland
8 2 3 35 Roger (Rocky) McIntosh Redskins Miami (FL)
9 2 6 38 Thomas Howard Raiders Texas-El Paso
10 3 3 67 Abdul Hodge Packers Iowa
2005 1 1 12 12 Shawne Merriman Chargers Maryland
2 1 15 15 Derrick O. Johnson Chiefs Texas
3 2 4 36 Barrett Ruud Buccaneers Nebraska
4 2 10 42 Kevin Burnett Cowboys Tennessee
5 2 13 45 Lofa Tatupu Seahawks USC
6 2 16 48 Odell Thurman Bengals Georgia
7 2 31 63 Matt McCoy Eagles San Diego State
8 3 6 70 Channing Crowder Dolphins Florida
9 3 14 78 Kirk Morrison Raiders San Diego State
10 3 18 82 Alfred Fincher Saints Connecticut
11 3 26 90 Jordan Beck Falcons Cal Poly
12 3 31 95 Darryl Blackstock Cardinals Virginia
13 3 34 98 Leroy Hill Seahawks Clemson
14 4 24 125 Brady Poppinga Packers Brigham Young

        Packers got two of the top ten LBs drafted in 2006 and Poppinga was the 14th LBer taken in 2005. It's certainly early but I think Brady will turn-out better than several LBs drafted before him. AJ is going to be a stud and I'm very hopeful about Abdul too. I really believe the LBs are a fixed position now. Nice reserves in Ben Taylor (who's starting material) and I like Roy Manning plus he's a good ST player.

        Defensive Line [9] total cap: ~$23.5m for known cap amounts...plus a guesstimate for a vet (Montgomery) and rookie (or two rooks if they go that route instead of the vet). I'll be shocked if Donnell Washington *is not* cut. Kenny Peterson will contribute as a swing-guy (as will 5th-man Cullen Jenkins).
 

7:20 PM 5/13/2006: Initial 53-man Roster WAG [offense-25/26; defense-24/25]:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I'm sure you've seen initial roster WAGs by various people...here's mine (obviously subject to change)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

  • *QB[3]- Brett, Aaron, Ingle Martin!
  • *RR[4/5]: Samkon, Ahman, WH, Najeh, ???
  • *TE[2-3]: Bubba, Donald Lee, POS-II???
  • *WR[5/6]: DD, Rod Gardner, Greg Jennings, "Cory Rodgers"[PR/KOR]; Ferguson/Boerigter
  • *OL[9]: Clifton, Tauscher, Wells, Colledge, Barry; Coston, Spitz, Whitticker/Klemm[9]-White/Jason/Lucier
  • *Specialists[3] - Rob Davis, Jon Ryan - punter, Billy Cundiff - kicker
  • *DL[9]: Kampman[de], KGB[de], Pickett[dt], Williams[dt], Jenkins[dt/de], Cole[dt][6],
    -[3] Montgomery[de]/Johnny Jolly[dt]/Dave Tollefson[de], Peterson[de/dt], Kenderick Allen[dt] + Jason Hunter[de]/Montez Murphy[de]//"Fat" Donnell Washington
  • LB[6]: Nick Barnett, A.J. Hawk, Abdul Hodge, Ben Taylor, Brady P., Roy Manning[6];
    Tracy White, Kurt Campbell [PUP], - Tim Goodwell/Byron Santiago/Schimmelmann
  • *DC[5/6]: Woodson, Al Harris, Carroll, Hawkins, Will Blackmon[5] -Horton, Dendy, Wishom
  • *DB/S[3/4]: Marquand Manuel, Nick Collins, Tyrone Culver, Marviel Underwood[4];
    -Jeremy Thornburg/Atari Bigby/Therrian Fontenot//Roman, Mark

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*-Go with 4 RB?...why not? I really don't think they need five; if Ahman's on PUP going into the first game [which I doubt], then Vonta Leech sticks...other wise I don't see needing >4
*-could also drop a position from TE seeing they've got *big* WRs [Boerigter is #5/6]; WR could be the most competitive offensive position in camp
*DL: could be the most competitive positions on the team...I think there are 6 obvious choices above [whether you agree with them or not] then it's a *serious* dog-fight for the final 3; I'm hoping they can PUP/IR at least two DL and 1/2 more for PS
*LB[6]: WOW!...I like what I see on-paper WRT the LB crew -- this could be the best Packers' crew I've seen since I started watching them -- I think the top-six are pretty much set
*DC/DB[9]: Adding Charles Woodson from 'DaRaidas' is *huge* in my book...more-so than if they'd have got Arrington or gone after Julian P...almost had Arrington though...I think the first-four safeties are good-enough 'n tuf'e'nuf to keep

9:27 PM 5/6/2006:  ...that is LFT as my GBPDG friends say...Anyway, I went golfing today.  Beautiful day but not a beautiful game (3-over bogey score [par 72]).  Had a few beers during the round and finished-off the 19th hole with a couple of 'Oil Cans' [Fosters] so all is/was good.  IIRC, before I left to go play I updated the cappage after the below blog entry...in case anybody cares that is...

            I’ve had a few eMails from this ‘cappage list’ which is always a good thing for me…means somebody reads my stuff anyway. :^)

[she told me I better post her picture or she’d kick my ass…]

            Btw, Tom Silverstein got Woodson’s 2006 base salary wrong…                 

Salary History for Charles Woodson [NFLPA database]

2006

1500000.00

2007

1250000.00

2008

3250000.00

2009

4000000.00

2010

5000000.00

2011

5500000.00

2012

6500000.00

 

 

     

…but Pete Dougherty got it right.  I’m thinking about making a WAG on AJ’s pending cap number.  Media speculation is he’ll eat-up about 1/3 of the rookie pool which sounds about right…but I’m still gonna have to sleep on it at least one more night.  I have added-in 12 UDFAs but only their base [all @ $275k – rookie/1st-year minimum].  I’m sure a few of them got a Signing Bonus but I have NFI who or how much.

8:26 AM 5/6/2006: Not that long ago, I had the Packers at $12,654,908 under the NFL's maximum cap figure. My how the draft changes things... Wow, quite the whirlwind player acquisition foray by ol' Ted eh? I hate to say it but he sure appears to have a lot of "Ron Wolf type" tendencies in him... This off-season, he's used *every* player acquisition avenue available.
       Last blog (or so) I mentioned/linked Woodson's (pretty sweet) deal which was by far the biggest cap effect. This time it's the addition/subtraction of the maximum "rookie cap" <http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=421016> allotment (-)$6.647 million. I adjusted Kendrick Allen's (whom the Packers apparently "outbid the St. Louis Rams") cap figure.
Bottom line: Pack is now $5,812,195 under the cap. Silverstein reported $12.36m under in a article on May 4, 2006 (which doesn't subtract "rookie cap allotment"). There are only xx players on the current roster that Ted Thompson did not acquire or resign. (I've listed them in red on the cap page)

9:15 PM 5/4/2006:  Several changes/charges to the 2006 cap.  Most notable is Charles Woodson's cap number for 2006.  Reporting by PackerNews and JSO is similar that they round-up his total cap figure to $6.7m but if you add the respective amounts individually the total cap number is less than $6.7m.  Btw, big thanks to Derek for the PackerNews link. 

"Mike S" sent the following link & question about Javon Walker:

This was in from the JSO (red text):

The trade of wide receiver Javon Walker to the Denver Broncos on Saturday resulted in the Packers picking up significant salary cap room.

Walker was scheduled to count $2.005 million against the salary cap in 2006, but as a result of the trade, the Packers will be relieved of more than half of that total because his $1.125 million base salary transfers over to the Broncos. The Packers are still responsible for the remaining portion because it relates to the signing and option bonuses Walker received when he signed the contract.


What is the Walker cap hit?

I make it 1.115,000.

Do youi know the total cap hit, & relatd savings for trading Walker to the Brocs?

Javon's actual base salary is scheduled to be $1.15m (according to NFLPA).  JWalk counts $855k in "dead cap" for 2006, i.e., his "cap hit" (2006 was his last year under contract).  Bottom line:  Packers are able to reinvest the $1.15m but the  Total Cap Savings is $1.15m minus the cap value for player #51.  The Packers are now $12,654,908 under.

2:41 PM 4/30/2006:  Wow, the draft is almost over.  Lots of different media opinions out there.  It's been nice listening to William Henderson's commentary on how things have gone or could go.  Some fans may be dismayed that Javon Walker was traded or that they didn't get enough for him.  While I'll miss Javon's play for the Packers, I still have him in fantasy football so I'm good either way.  WRT maybe not getting enough for him...well, by my slanted view they got three players in the draft: Colledge, Blackmon, and Ty Culver.  Not bad at all IMO!...  Maybe you also factor-in Johnny Jolly (#183) too...then it's a four-for-one trade.  Not quite a Hershal Walker trade by any stretch of the imagination but again, not bad in today's NFL trading post.

Even though I wanted Big Vern, I'm extremely pleased the Hawk has landed in GB!  HUGE, HUGE impact player based-on everything I've heard and seen on tape.  Yeah, Mark Slereth <sp> was a beyoch in his commentary about Hawk but WhoCares (btw, that's also the name of my JMMFFL team)?...I don't.  Wow, also got Abdul Hodge.  Nicky Barnett, & AJ as the book-end LBs with Hodge in the middle...LB sure went from a weakness to a strength in one day!  I know my Big 'Lil Bro is a very happy Packer Backer because of it.

The WR position looks good to me.  DD, RG, and Marc Boerigter is a solid trio.  It wasn't too long ago that Brett was chucking the rock to the likes of Antonio Freeman and Bill Schroeder.  What he has now is much better than those two.  Toss-in the draft picks and there ya have it...not bad because the draft picks are return guys with good RAC and should be able to play in the slot as the 4/5 guys.  I think Fergy's days are numbered.  Would be nice to get something for him but I'm not counting on it.  ...maybe a 7th round pick tops.  However, I'd keep Fergy before David Martin.

I suppose one need, or at least questionable area, that hasn't been looked at in the draft is kicker/punter.  Hell, who do the Packers have on the roster...(I know who, just being facetious).  I'd have no problem if TT was able to draft the Kicker from Ohio St.  If not, I'm sure they'll go the UDFA route to add another leg into the mix.

10:56 PM 4/26/2006:  Based on ESPN and JSO reporting, I'm jumping the gun and taking a self-educated WAG for Charles Woodson's 2006 cap number.  See the cap page for results.  The Packers also signed some DL guy who played with the Giants last season, so he's also in the top 51 for salary cap purposes.  Packers went from ~$19m to ~13m with a stroke of the pen by Sir Charles.  He's won't be confused with Reggie, but I firmly believe this is a momentous signing.  No, not as important as Reggie's was...signing Woodson certainly is a few pegs down but he will have major impact.  I think he can and will be a positive influence for Ahmad Carroll.  We're going to be 'tight' at CB this season!!!

6:41 PM 4/26/2006: Well, I haven't read 'ole dYlan's article yet [see below] but the title sure is catchy. '...end to strange offseason'...I suppose one could think that way but I don't think it was overly strange at all. However, I think there was much media hype about nothing. There was never a doubt [well maybe .1%] in my mind that Brett would return for the 2006 season. In fact, he actually leaves it open for a 2007 return [which I think is highly likely at this point].

Posted Apr. 26, 2006
Decision finally puts end to strange offseason
[excerpt]
WEEK 17
Packers 23, Seahawks 17
Packers Poll
Is Brett Favre’s decision to return in 2006 the right one for the Green Bay Packers?
Yes, the Packers need Favre
No, it's time to move on
I don't know

By Dylan B. Tomlinson
PackersNews.com
[/excerpt]

I haven't read my eMail group yet but the PackersNews' Poll is interesting.

Poll Results:
82.3%
Yes, the Packers need Favre
13.1%
No, it's time to move on
4.6%
I don't know

Total Votes: 5042
 

Btw, I voted for "Yes, the Packers need Favre" because they didn't list a 'Always thought he'd be back' voting line.

Now some other thoughts and snippets...from TSN PREMIUM:

A.J. Hawk
OLB, Ohio State - NFL comparison: Takeo Spikes, Bills
PROJECTION: Green Bay Packers Round 1, Pick 5
Overall grade: 8.5 Position rank: 1

The Sporting News' Super 99
1 Reggie Bush*, USC RB -- 5-11 202 4.33 24 -- -- 40 10-9 -- -- -- 21
2 Matt Leinart, USC QB -- 6-5 224 4.90 -- -- -- 37 9-6 -- -- -- 35
3 Mario Williams*, NC State DE -- 6-6 292 4.66 35 1.59 2.72 40 10-0 4.36 -- 7.19 21
4 D'Brickashaw Ferguson, Va. OT -- 6-5 305 5.07 26 -- -- 30 8-11 4.89 -- 7.64 22
5 A.J. Hawk, Ohio St. OLB -- 6-1 248 4.42 24 1.56 2.65 40 9-7 3.96 11.06 6.82 27
6 Haloti Ngata*, Oregon DT -- 6-4 338 5.13 37 1.71 2.90 31 9-2 4.65 -- 7.95 17
7 Vernon Davis*, Maryland TE -- 6-3 254 4.38 33 1.51 2.52 42 10-8 4.17 -- 7.00 20
8 Vince Young*, Texas QB -- 6-4 228 4.57 -- -- -- -- -- -- 16
9 Michael Huff, Texas S -- 5-11 198 4.34 21 1.47 2.52 40 10-5 3.96 -- 6.68 16
10 Jay Cutler, Vandy QB -- 6-3 226 4.77 23 1.62 2.76 4.26 -- 7.10 29
-
Something maybe Javon ought to think about...he's under contract for 2005, if the Packers want him to play he has to play for them; they don't have to trade him. In the future, the CBA allows the Packers to franchise him for two consecutive seasons if they want... Javon was born 14 Oct 1978...he's not a spring chicken anymore but WRs can play to a ripe old age if they're conditioned properly and can stay healthy. Good luck with your decision JWalk...sit if you must. You will never recoup the $$ if you sit.

A guy I work with [Saints Fan] is the one who told me about Brett's announcement when I got into work this morning. One other thing he told me [rumor he read] is the Packers are (seriously?) talking with the Broncos about JWalk. Previously I've read where the Broncos are not satisfied with Ashlee LeLie <psp>. It all makes me go ...Hmmmm

Well, enough rambling for now. And oh BTW, nothing new player wise WRT the cap...OR NOT! JK Holy Shit, they landed Charles Woodson today!

Woodson agrees to terms with Packers
Contract with Pro Bowl cornerback for $52 million over 7 years
"...The structure of the contract is unknown and it's unclear how much guaranteed money Woodson will earn, but the Packers apparently made a significant financial committment to the four-time Pro Bowl cornerback who was a first-round draft choice of the Oakland Raiders..."
[/excerpt]

Wow, guess PackerNews better revise their headlines... This has been a GREAT OFFSEASON IMO...all we had to do is wait; show a little patience. The Woodson signing eliminates a big need [IMO]. We have an extremely solid top five DBs now and are comfortably set at 6[maybe7] deep. Cross-off Huff from your draft list. I think I'll put my beer $ on Vernon @ #5.  Back to the Woodson signing...it'll be interesting to see his numbers once they're reported.

That said, my initial WAG is his 2006 cap value will be in the neighborhood of $8 million...obviously base, PRSB, and likely some other LTBE amount (possibly $3m or more).

7:47 PM 4/21/2006: I'm going to jump the "official announcement" and consider it a done deal [WRT my cappage]. His remaining PRSB ($885,000) accelerates into 2006 which makes his total 2006 PRSB $1,180,000 and total cap value is now $1,355,000.

  • Total remaining (available) cap space: $17,956,905 [down from $19,016,905]

My player ranking for 2006 draft
1. Reggie Bush
2. Vince Young
3. Super Mario
3. Vernon Davis
3. AJ Hawk
6. Matt Leinart
6. Michael Huff
8. D'Brickashaw Ferguson
9. Jay Cutler
10. Haloti Ngata

1:18 PM 4/16/2006:  Although the Packers have signed a couple of players (K Rhys Lloyd and WR Leo Bookman) there is no-change to the cap (except for unknown daily off-season workout expenditures).  However, I have added them to the spreadsheet.  Both are first year minimum total salary which is not in the top 51.  If you're interesting in reading my feelings on the current roster click the editorial link...  Finally, I've been asked about the 2007 cap.  I dunno, haven't looked at it and don't plan on it until after the draft picks are signed.

11:48 AM 4/2/2006:  In the AmCapNFL, Adam JT13 shared an eMail with the group, dated 1 April, that listed the Cap Status totals for all 32 teams.  The Packers are $19,016,905 under (#2 behind San Diego).  Based on my previous number of $18,365,375,  my difference was $651,530.  After further review, I discovered a couple of errors on my part:

  • (1) Javon Walker - triggered a $500,000 escalator clause based on statistics from the first four years of his contract. The escalator increased his 2006 base salary from $650,000 to $1,150,000. I originally accounted for the escalator as LTBE but when the NFLPA data changed his base from $650,000 to $1,150,000 I forgot to delete the $500,000 from the LTBE column. 
  • (2) Billy Cundiff cap value counts at the discount rate of $425,000. 
  • (3) The remaining $8,470 difference was added to the projected workout bonus amounts generic total which I previously listed at $153, 850.

8:15 PM 3/29/2006:  PackersNews.com reports the contract numbers for Marc Boerigter, Najeh Davenport, Ben Taylor, and Billy Cundiff.  Available cap space is $18,365,375.

1:00 PM 3/25/2006:  On 24 March 2006, Bob McGinn reported the Packers had '...about $20 million' of available cap space.  My number was $341,005 less. Since then, the Packers signed K Billy Cundiff and LB Ben Taylor.  The cap amounts I'm listing for each is a WAG at this point.  Available cap space is also a WAG at ~$18,838,995.

6:34 PM 3/23/2006: Thanks to those who've sent eMail. Updates for today include William Henderson, Rod Gardner, additional details for Tracy White, and Harry Williams is released.  My spreadsheet now says $19,653,995 under. 

For those of you that are somewhat upset with Ted Thompson for not spending enough money in free agency, there's still plenty of time to do so regardless whether there are any "big names" left to spend it on.  Maybe they'll extend some of their young guys who have signed their tenders and things of that nature.  Having a large cap cushion is not a bad thing even if it's well into the season...

It appears that the Packers didn't have a chance to match the Colts offer to Vinatieri nor could they match the dome appeal...  Julian Peterson never left the West Coast but I'm not sure I would want the Packers to spend that amount anyway.

4:40 PM 3/21/2006 - "Big Thanks!" to Derek Swanson for sending me the link for Ryan Pickett's contract details. Instead of being $23,356,155 under, my spreadsheet now says $21,431,155.

1:11 PM 3/21/2006:  I was on vacation for a few days and I'm trying to get caught-up. All transactions that I've accounted for in the salary cap spreadsheet, in conjunction from all-sources I've read, indicate the Packers are in the neighborhood of $23,356,155 under the cap. Packers' transactions for this cap update:

  • Adjusted base salary numbers for Javon Walker and Kenny Peterson
  • Added LB Tracy White (released John Leake)
  • Added Kevin Barry's numbers
  • Added WR Harry Williams ($350k - makes rule of 51)
  • Added Ryan Pickett's base salary and, according to JSO, Ryan Pickett "was worth slightly more than $3 million per year." At this time I'll presume his 2006 cap value is ~$3 million [$1m PRSB & $600k R/RB].

-- No numbers on William Henderson's contrat at NFLPA as of 1:36 PM 3/21/2006; same goes for Rod Gardner...neither are in the spreadsheet.

- The last 'number under' I've seen (15 March) reported by the press is: ..."Not counting the Pickett, Barry and Gardner signings, the Packers are $27.7 million under the salary cap"...

5:28 PM 3/15/2006:  Updated Aaron Kampman's numbers based on JSO reporting.  Added Marquand Manuel.  However, his base salary numbers at NFLPA differ from JSO reporting.  $28,140,755 under (give or take).

8:27 PM 3/13/2006:  NFLPA WEB sites lists Aaron Kampman's base salary at $900k.  If his cap value is ~$6m then either his PRSB or LTBE increases by ~$287k.  Although the NFLPA WEB site hasn't recalculated in the $40k increase of base for each applicable player, I decided to do it at this time (thus the $1.61m difference with McGinn).  Still haven't seen a total cap number for Manuel...  Sure seems like they're waiting on Ryan Pickett's decision before they go fishing again.  So far it's been good IMO.  Sure Ahman and Kampy are your own, but it was a good thing to resign them and it cannot be overlooked.  TT is obviously impressed with Manuel and provided the press with a nice report.  Sounds like he could compliment Nick(y) Collins well.  I'm waiting for a splash at LB but don't mind pursuing Ben Taylor.  He'd be an upgrade over Lenon and is starter quality too.  Julian Peterson and Adam Vinatieri are still available...all is good.

7:37 PM 3/12/2006:  Just saw McGinn's number about 30 minutes ago which forced me to recalculate.  His number was 'as of Friday' [10 March 2006].  Kampman's extension was announced Friday so I'll presume McGinn's number included Kampman at ~$6m total cap value...or 5.68% if you're a player.  I'm also presuming the Option Bonus for Rogers and Collins were prorated equally over the remaining four years on their respective contracts.  If I do those things, then my cap number matches McGinn at $30.504 million under.

As soon as the media reports Manuel's final numbers, then he can be added in.

1:05 PM 3/12/2006:  I'm still unable to actually reconcile my -3,078,525 difference with Clayton (as of 10 March 2006 when he said $35m under). However, I'm presuming the option bonuses for Rogers and Collins have been exercised and prorated by the Packers [see 12 March 2006 projection]. Under that assumption, I have a balanced spreadsheet. 

I have some facts and presumptions...

  • The Packers have started FA in a positive light by re-signing Kampman and signing Manuel.

"The Packers reached a five-year, $10 million deal with Seahawks safety Marquand Manuel. Included in the deal is a $2 million signing bonus.
o<snip>o
On Friday night, the Packers re-signed defensive end Aaron Kampman to a five-year, $25 million deal that included $11 million in guarantees. On Sunday, they are scheduled to have Rams defensive tackle Ryan Pickett in for a visit."

[Big sigh of relief] Extending Aaron Kampman is *huge* but "Super" Mario is still a top draft consideration (IMO). Can't tell by the above blurb what Kampy's contact break-out is for cap purposes. $11m in guarantees doesn't sound bad over 5-years...the $25m total projection sounds better than KVdB's.

My projection what he may have received and the 2006 cap implication:
I'm guessing his signing bonus is ~$6m because according to the CBA (paraphrased by Adam JT13):

"the combined salaries, roster bonuses and reporting bonuses in all capped years (currently through 2006) of the contract must be at least as much as the combined prorated bonuses in capped years of the contract."

I think the rest of the "guaranteed $11m" could be in first-year salary and other bonus (LTBE) amounts (e.g., option, roster, reporting).  My projection for Aaron Kampman:

2006 base [projection] - 30% increase from his 2005 amount [i.e., $1.56m]
2006 PRSB [projection] - $1.2m = cap value so far: $2.76m
2006 LTBE [projection] - $500k-$1.5m but I'll project low using $500k. Reason: he's getting $8m cash in 2006 and his "guaranteed amount is $11m", tack-on a projected $2+ million base in 2007 plus an option bonus of $500k-$1.5m [I'll project the higher]. I highest his 2006 cap value might be 4.11% [$4.26m] but my guess is 3.14%. Players apparently like working in percentage numbers... ;^>...

Marquand Manuel: Five year deal with $2m signing bonus is straight-forward. [PSRB will be $400k/yr * 5] Leaves ~$8m to be divvied-up in base salary and bonus amounts.

I'll WAG his 2006 base is the quasi-standard 30% increase, in his case $852,800. Obviously it could be higher... Anyway, final WAG on total cap value -- $1,252,800

Note: Both Kampman and Manuel have green color background on 3/12/2006 projection page.  If my projections are remotely close, the Packers could have ~$31m in available remaining cap space.

11:29 AM 3/11/2006:  The CBA extension is obviously a good thing and I always thought it would get done.  There's tons of reporting on it via the WEB...and too many links to list.  Minimum salary amounts increase by $40k and I've updated the cap page to reflect the affected players [Bottom line is it ate $1.315m].  Additionally, I adjusted Ahman Green's number based on further reporting WRT his contract details. Additionally, his 2006 cap number will increase by $31,250 for every game he is on the roster ($500k maximum).  Finally, some of his NLTBE incentives could easily be reached ($2.25m maximum).

John Claytons new cap figures on 10 March state the Packers were $35 million under the 2006 salary cap of $102 million.  That's a (+) $3,078,525 difference from what I had on the 9th.  My current WAG on the difference is the option bonus amounts for Aaron Rogers ($3m) and Nick(y) Collins ($1m) were paid and prorated over the 2006-2009 seasons.  If that's the case, I can match Clayton's number give or take a few dollars.

Aaron Kampman has apparently been resigned but contract details have not been reported (yet).  I think it's great because he was their #1 priority (IMO). 

Javon Walker is a big negative with his media demands.  I think Ted Thompson addressed the situation quickly and firmly.  Although I had some issues with things Thompson did/didn't do in 2005, I'm really starting to like him as a GM.

4:55 PM 3/7/2006: I updated the 2006 salary cap yesterday. What happened?...well, I'm sure you heard Ahman Green was re-signed to a one-year deal. I think it's great news, but I'm a homer. Obviously a Packers' fan, but I also live near Omaha, NE...Ahman's home-town. It appears he'll only count around $2m towards the cap because it seems the remaining ~$3m is in incentives. [which I'm presuming are NLTBE] Just visited KFFL for this update on his contract details:

KFFL | Packers | Contract update: A. Green
Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:47:50 -0800
PackersNews.com reports Green Bay Packers RB Ahman Green's new, one-year contract will pay him about $1.75 million in base salary and signing bonus. His base salary is $1.35 million, meaning his signing bonus is about $400,000. Also, he'll receive another $2.5 million if he hits all his incentives.

A JSO article today says the Packers will sign S Marquand Manuel out-the-chute. To be quite honest, I haven't seen him play much and he's not who I envisioned getting. But, he sounds like an upgrade at safety along side Nick(y) Collins. I like Manuel's size and that he's been thought of as a special teams' demon.

Guess the owners are still fighting it out WRT dividing-up the pie or even defining what the pie is made of... Un-F......g believable! The more ya have, the more greed rears its ugly head. I still don't believe we'll see an uncapped year in 2007.

Silverstein and I still have a ~$2m total cap difference. Oh well, you decide...I'm not changing my number until I discover it's necessary.

9:48 AM 3/4/2006: Roster moves - "the Packers made one-year qualifying offers to defensive tackle Cullen Jenkins and nose tackle Colin Cole and signed cornerback Jason Horton to a one-year contract. Kenny Peterson is the only one of the Green Bay Packers' three restricted free agents to receive a qualifying offer." [Note: Players count vs the salary cap if they receive a tender.]

I'm not surprised the NFL/NFLMC & NFLPA decided to delay the start of FA. Obviously, it's extremely important to have a CBA extension in place. However, the Packers would survive either way...and I'd buy more stock to ensure it too!

Cutting Na'il Diggs was the one cap move they had to make. I loved watching Diggs play but it was time to un-load his final season on that contract. I suppose it's possible they could resign him at a later date...who knows at this point...

I expected they would resign Jason Horton because he was an ExclusiveRights FA. Horton's might be big enough to play safety and can play the slot. I don't like it when he's playing outside CB.

I expected the other tenders also. However, I'm somewhat surprised Antonio Chatman was not tendered...maybe even shocked. Sure Antonio can't get any bigger but he provided value as a PR and 4/5th WR regardless of his small stature. The decision puzzles me because his PR reliability (i.e., does not fumble) was nearly flawless...extremely important in my book. He's also flashed explosiveness at PR and technically has two PRTDs with the Packers. Oh well, PR just became a need...

Sounds like the Packers and Ahman Green are serious about getting a deal done.

What is Aaron Kampman worth?....the multi-million dollar question. You can be the judge and/or jury. I think he's worth a lot. It also depends on how you paint the picture. I really think Kyle Vanden Bosch's contract is a good one and would be acceptable to the Packers. Don't be fooled by posturing that the media quotes.

I saw "RUMINT" by ESPNI that says the Eagles will be going hot for G/C LeCharles Bentley. Bummer...I wouldn't want to get in a spending war with them. I'd now look elsewhere.

7:56 PM 3/2/2006:  I've updated the 2006 cap page.  Clayton's number ($23.5m under)  appears to be using the top 53 base salaries. Additionally, he has not accounted for the 2006 'cap adjustment' of $1.6m (for Craig Nall's UnEarned 2005 LTBE) [which actually doesn't count until the 2006 year begins]. $700k of Robert Ferguson's originally reported 2006 'salary' of $2.1m is actually LTBE. The Packers are being charged $153,890 for 2006 workout bonus [but I don't know the specific player breakout].  Additionally, Na'il Diggs has been cut.

3:07 PM 2/28/2006:  I've updated the 2006 cap page.  I visited NFLPA today to check-on player base salaries and noticed I didn't have Garrett Cross listed.  Kurt Campbell and Chaz Williams' salaries are $235k instead of $310k. Additionally, I discovered Robert Ferguson was listed for $1.4m instead of $2.1m.  I'm not sure if PFW used $1.4m or $2.1m in their 20 Feb 06 report...so my difference with them is either -610,974 or -1,310,974.  Hopefully, it's the lesser amount...

I'm sure many of you have seen Tom Silverstein report the Packers are $19.7m under.  I don't know how he got that number and he hasn't answered my eMail.

4:50 PM 2/25/2006: In my previous BLOG, I said Rob Davis was the only off-season 'workout' LTBE factored in. My Mistake!  The actual 2006 'workout bonus' data I have is on the following players: Carroll, Barnett, Rob Davis, and Jon Ryan [I'm unsure about Robert Thomas so I won't consider his $10k amount as a 'workout bonus']. Additionally, the eight players allocated to NFL-E for 2006 do not receive 'workout bonus' (LTBE) amounts and typically neither do draft picks or UDFAs.

  • This leaves 47 players that can earn 2006 off-season 'workout bonus' money that I cannot account for because I do not know their individual amounts.  However, not all of them will earn a 'workout bonus' amount because they'll be working out elsewhere.  To earn one, a player must workout in a Green Bay Packers' facility.

For 2005, the information I have indicates the Packers paid $189,570 in off-season 'workout bonus' money to 35 players. Except for Carroll ($30k) and Barnett (~$38k), the highest individual amount was $6,160 (x6), and the lowest was 1,210 (x4).

  • Will they be paying considerably more than what they did in 2005?
  • Is the JSOn-line reporting numbers that include 2006 'workout bonus' amounts?

Although the 2006 'cap adjustment' for Un-Earned 2005 LTBE (a.k.a. 'LTBE loophole') does  not officially count until the 2006 cap year starts <~ 3 March>, I am including it -- PFW doesn't and I don't believe any other media source has either.

2/22/2006 7:27PM:  I've updated the cappage because Rob Davis was signed.  I've also included an adjustment amount and a new 'actual cap space?' amount.  PFW recently released cap amounts for all teams but they didn't include the 'LTBE loop-hole' amounts ($1.6m for Craig Nall).  With that amount factored in, I was still -791,694.  Part of the difference could be attributed to PFW (or source) 'rounding' their numbers.  Another factor is LTBE to players for their off-season workouts.  A player receives $110/day 'workout bonus' over a 16 week period (64 days maximum).  I have not factored in the off-season workout bonus LTBE for any players (except Rob Davis).  Looks like 23,344,280 is the number right now...

7:21 PM 2/19/2006: According to (ESPN Insider) John Clayton, "the Titans prevented their most important free agent from leaving by reaching a four-year, $21 million deal with Pro Bowl defensive end Kyle Vanden Bosch. Included in the deal is about $15 million of guarantees."

A 'four-year, $21m deal that includes ~$15m in guarantees' sounds like a lot...but it doesn't tell me the signing bonus amount or whether any base salaries (besides 2006) are guaranteed. Who knows, maybe the base salaries from 2006-09 are all guaranteed amounts. Regardless, the Vanden Bosch contract will impact negotiations with Kampman and because of that, I've revised my WAG for Kampman ($9.4m guaranteed over first-two seasons).

~$4.4m remaining to spend (comfortably) on "other/ours - Flanny, Ruegs, Rob Davis, and Craig Nall" FAs. Rob Davis shouldn't cost much -- probably veteran's minimum with the minimum signing bonus...at least that's what I'd budget for my LS position. I also resign Grey Ruegamer to veteran's minimum with a minimum signing bonus. $4.075m left.

3:47 PM 2/18/2006:  Continuing on with my projection WAGs...Still need one starting OL and one LB via FA.  Also want to resign some/the rest of our FAs - but project we lose Grady, KBarry, and Najeh.  It's a coin-flip between OL and LB...are you offensive or defensive minded?  Where does the best remaining value lie?  Can the Packers satisfy both OL and LB via FA and spend the bucks to do so?  I'm sure there are other questions too.

LeCharles Bentley is my preference...or at least how the coin-flip lands.  Other than maybe Julian Pederson, Bentley will be the most expensive acquisition.  I think he would be worth it too and definitely fill a glaring need.  It might be low, but I think they could get him for ~$11.75m in guarantees over the first two years with $8.5m of that paid in 2006.  Four-year deal worth $18.25m.  Packers could have ~$5.35m remaining without touching the projected cap cushion or rookie 'mini-cap.'  Still enough room to grab one of the FA LBs but Julian Pederson is definitely out of the picture at this point.  However, the 2006 cap value, for the LB, should not exceed $2m.

1:16 PM 2/18/2006: Excerpts from: [AmCapNFL] 'What happens in 2006 if 2007 is uncapped'

  • Cap number - It has been reported to be in the 92 to 95 million range. With an extension the cap number is likely to be over $100 million.
  • Amortization. Amortized bonuses can only be prorated over four years. In 2005 they were allowed to be prorated over 5 years. If the CBA is extended, they will be prorated over the life of the contract or 7 years, whichever is the shorter time period.
  • Limited salary increases. The 30% rule will take effect. Future increases in a player's salary is limited to 30 percent of a player's base salary in 2006 plus his LTBE incentives. Example - A player whose 2006 base salary was 1,000,000, the maximum increase from year to year for the rest of his contract could be no more than 300,000(30% of 1 million). Paraphrasing eaglescap - "for the purposes of the 30% rule salary is defined as base salary, plus roster bonus, plus LTBE incentive. Signing bonuses do not count in calculation for the 30% rule, but pro-rations from option bonuses do.
  • June 1 has no significance - Clubs are usually able to cut players from their roster after June 1 to defer some of the dead-money hit to the following league year. With no salary cap in 2007, whenever a club releases a player all of his unamortized signing bonus will hit the 2006 cap.
  • LTBE/NTLBE incentives - NLTBE incentives won't count against the cap until they're earned. LTBE incentives will count against the cap until they cannot be earned. Adamjt13 provides this example - "So, for example, if a team has $500,000 of cap room late in the season and a player is approaching an NLTBE incentive that would earn him $1 million, the team has to open up another $500,000 of cap room when he earns it. On the other hand, if a player has an LTBE incentive, that money becomes available under the cap as soon as it can't be earned (for example, if a player is put on IR before reaching the necessary statistics to earn the incentive).

5:59 PM 2/15/2006:  I've revised the 2006 cappage to include two new columns (suggestion by dave in tx) on the far right called "pre-LTBE recoup" and "post-LTBE recoup" that depict the actual $$ amount the Packers will be able to reinvest.  "Pre-June caphit" and "Post-June caphit" depict the sum of the 2006 PRSB plus all remaining PRSB from future seasons and any Reporting Bonus (paid) if applicable.

4:41 PM 2/14/2006: http://members.cox.net/cappage/2006cap_proj3.htm  Cap Projections ptIII. OK, part II is still applicable. However, the 2006 cap is projected to be $93m (data I hadn't seen before Miguel showed me -- a $1m increase). To be on the safe side, I'm going to project a $5m cap cushion and $6m for draft picks.  I think they can  easily resign Gardner, Henderson, and Ahman. Gardner wants to return and will accept the 3rd WR role with the chance to compete for the #1/2 position with DD and JWalk. Obviously, Garder is #3 in this trio. He's signs a reasonable 4-yr contract with $4m guaranteed/paid in 2006. Henderson resigns for 3-yrs and has a 2006 cap value of $1.025m...total package worth $4.235m. Ahman resigns for a 1-yr vet minimum base deal + 25k SB and NLTBE of ~$1m. Anyway, those signing are more fantasy WAGs...but plausible IMO.

Still need Safety, LB, OL starters (2), and look to resign any/all of our remaining pending UFAs.

FA safety is rich for quality (not quantity) as is LB. At LB, you've got one very expensive guy (2005) two years removed from his Achilles injury. He was great in his pre-injury hey-day. Pretty good stats for 2005. He won't come cheap, and will possibly command the highest signing bonus by a UFA defensive player in 2006. Although I'd love to see him in GB, I look elsewhere and target Archuleta, Polley, Chavous, Tank Willams, or Chris Hope.

Archuleta [my favorite]  had a $1.62m base in 2005 and Chavous had $1.9m. They were the highest base salaries. Tank Williams and Chris Hope join them in my top four safeties. Take your pick, any of them would be a fantastic improvement over Roman. Lets say (hey, this is my WAG anyway) Archuleta desires to be paid ~$6m in 2006 guarantees...and the Packers want his cap value at $2.43m. This is easily doable.

Starting four DBs is set with Al Harris, Nick Collins, Ahmed Carroll, and Archuleta. Underwood, Hawkins are the next two (6), then maybe Horton, Thornburg or/and somebody else currently under contract (not named Roman...remember, I cut him)...nine DB's tops. Still need to bring-in ~2 more (obviously draft one regardless).

~$9 million left. Can now look for starter at LB or OL and our pending FAs for depth (or possible starter: Grady, Flanny, or Kevin Barry).

LeCharles Bentley is a pro-bowl G/C...and would definitely be an upgrade for the Packers...or do I look elsewhere, maybe Grady or one of our other FAs?. What about LB?
Our pending UFAs: Grady, Flanny, Kevin Barry, Reugs, Nall, and Davenport. Other than Bently, I'd rather go in order: Tommy Polley, Will Witherspoon, David Thornton, Toniu Fonoti, Kevin Barry/Mike Flanagan

How much will Bentley want? Probably a lot!...and could cost almost as much as Hutchinson. LOTS OF $$$ no doubt. As GM, how much of the $9m (remaining) target figure do you want to spend on one player?

11:28 PM 2/11/2006: http://members.cox.net/cappage/2006cap_proj2.htm

  1. Instead of cutting Adrian Klemm (400k waste); cut his base by 30%, drop his $200k LTBE but add NLTBE of $500k. Cap gain is $500k.
  2. Definitely cut Diggs and Roman.
  3. Obviously tender all R/EFAs.
  4. TAG (franchise) Longwell. 
  5. Project ~$9m cap cushion for initial flexibility (draft picks, maybe round two FA, and emergency in-season stuff).
  6. Re-sign Aaron Kampman before the start of FA period. Projection: ~$2.245m cap hit. 
  7. Convert $800k of Collins' LTBE into signing bonus (and prorate 2006-09 - $200k/yr).
  8. Convert $3m of Rogers' LTBE into signing bonus (and prorate 2006-09 - $750k/yr).
  9. Further contract restructuring of other players is unnecessary at this point.
  10. Go FA.shopping and spend some $$.

9:06 PM 2/11/2006:  The initial RFA tenders I've seen are somewhat contradicting. 2006 is still a capped year so mentioning 'uncapped' is irrelevant. $685k - $721k is the likely range for the RFA low-tender (I used $685k). I don't see Peterson or Chatman being in the middle-tender category.  Packers will most likely be in the top five/ten for available cap space and only have 4.58% waste of the projected $92m (minimum) cap (per Miguel's research).  

I'm now projecting ~$24.8m under if Diggs and Roman are cut [plus adding in all tenders (R/EFA)].

5:42 PM 2/9/2006:  I've updated the 'players file' that contains contract data I've collected from the WEB.  I've also made a couple of tweaks to the 2006 cappage.  I increased Clifton's and Franks' PRSB and added OL Wayne Lucier. I'm thinking BJ Sander gets cut and they keep the Canadian instead.

My questions to y'all: How much of the available cap (~$21m) will TT spend on outside FA?  Who is your favorite outside FA?  How much in 1st year guaranteed money are you willing to spend on any player?

4:27 PM 2/5/2006: For random reasons, I have racked 'n' stacked *my* favorite UFA players (79 total). I'm not going to focus on a salary WAG for these guys but they definitely fit my idea of a starter or high value depth. I'm sure you'll quibble with the ranking but that's OK. I think the most needed positions are starters first (and foremost), then go for depth. In FA I'm looking for starters (and 3rd WR, or 3rd DB, etc. can be considered starters in my book).

On my list, four players have red background, blue print. They are my franchise type guys I do not think the Packers will have a shot at or (in Edgerrin's case) are not worth what they're seeking. Guys with green background should be obvious. Yellow background are guys I like to varying degrees. Overall, players are ranked by blocks of 5-10 so the ordering is negotiable.

This has been done prior to SB XL kickoff.  Here's links to FA positions I haven't previously linked: DE, DT, WR, QB, and P/K.

02/04/2006: I created a 2006 projection which includes tenders for  RFA (WAG 10% increase from 2005) and EFA players.  Additionally, I think Na'il Diggs (99.9% certain) and Mark Roman (>50%) will be released. Additionally, "Dead Money" amounts (i.e., PR$B) for some players could increase based on the following CBA excerpt (*Side Letter 11/1/95: Sec. 1):

up to 50% of the portion of the signing bonus that would otherwise be allocated to the Uncapped Years (the “Difference”), shall be deducted in equal portions from those Uncapped Years and reallocated1 in equal portions over the Capped Years of the Subject Contract (or, if there are fewer than three Capped Years within the term of the Subject Contract, over the first three years of the Subject Contract).

My interpretation of "shall be..." is that the team has the option but is not mandated to do so.  The Packers have done so in the past (e.g., Ahmad Carroll and I believe Javon Walker)...they'll have plenty of 2006 cap room to use this option on a few others (except maybe rookies due to the "rookie cap").  Ferguson and maybe a few others will also be "cap casualties."  It doesn't matter when they cut Ferguson because his 'cap hit' won't change whenever he's cut.  Guys like Adrian Klemm will because of their LTBE amounts. 

I also expect the Packers will use a TAG designation on Longwell or Kampman but have not included it in my projection.  Major Needs (i.e., starters) in no particular order: Two OL (might have one already on roster in addition to Wells whom I'm counting on to start); Safety (Roman's replacement - he's not on the roster yet); One LB (I'm counting on Poppinga to start); DE (if Kampman doesn't return); and PK (if Longwell leaves).

02/04/2006: I updated Ahmad Carroll's 2006 PR$B and added punter Jon Ryan.  Ryan signed a 3-yr deal that included a $35k signing bonus.  His base salaries are: $235k (2006), $310k (07), and $368,750 (08).  Ryan's 2006 cap value will be at least $246,667 (base +11,667 PR$B) but could be as high as $252,500 (base + 11,667 PR$B + 5,833 [50% max of] uncapped yrs PR$B).  My previous total available cap space (on 28 Jan 06) was $21,717,860 but is now $21,643,360.  Not too shabby if you ask me!

Jon Ryan is an intriguing punter with a big leg...I'm glad he kept the Packers on his radar scope.  I wonder if he's a good holder or if the Packers will again carry two punters. ;^>...

Some of the color/background differences in the 2006 cappage are as follows:  White background - players that I think won't make the final 53; Blue on gray background - LTBE, which could change; Bold red on gray background - new PR$B adjustments; Bold Black on gray background - Starters; Italic Black on gray background - potential cap cuts or retirement; Black on gray background - reserves that will make final 53.

01/26/2006: This isn't a cap update and I've checked to see if they signed anybody...they haven't. 

A friend of mine wrote the following:

> Okie's Travis Wilson. Man, I'd love to see Wilson in GB next year
> at #38...don't think he'll last that long, though.

That's the interesting thing about 'draft projection': roll-the-dice, spin the wheel, whatever term you want to use, ya just never know where guys will go (except for maybe the top ten or so). While my friend is pretty adept, I'm not so good at 'draft projection' (except for 2001)...but still do it anyway.

However, I still believe the draft must be supplemented by FA...but some may think that's a problem especially since it comes before the draft.  I don't...and think you should be able to project current NFL players into your team roles much better than college players. FA is a tool that simply must be used by teams! If you use it properly then your 'draft projection' should be much better and have clear focus. (Needs are a basic principle and wants are secondary.)

At WR, I expect JWalk back in the starting line-up along with DD so my focus would be resigning Rod Gardner for the #3 spot. That would be a solid trio plus I also like Antonio Chatman at #4 + his PR duty. I'm happy with this scenario at WR so drafting one isn't a round two priority.

In the JSO On-line:
http://www.jsonline.com/packer/news/jan06/387305.asp
> Green seeks new start
> Free agent hopes Packers want him
> By ROB REISCHEL
> Special to Packer Plus
> Posted: Jan. 25, 2006

Some of my Packers' eMail friends like reading Rob...he's grown on me considerably in the last couple of years. I pretty much agree with most of his writing in the above article. There's no doubt the big question is 'if the Packers feel the same.'

Personally, I want Ahman back but initially think it should be in a reserve role. Sure, let him compete for #1 with Samkon but think Ahman is better suited for (and will wind-up) #2. I think the article's contention 'it's extremely unlikely any team will give Green anything more than a one-year, minimum deal packed with incentives' is probably an accurate league-wide thought.  I certainly think so anyway!  However, I would offer him a three, maybe four, year deal that included a nice 2007 roster bonus but near-minimal guaranteed first year payout.  The contract could be structured so it would not have an adverse effect on future cap years.

When the Packers visit Brett's house, maybe they'll bring with them a check to the tune of $7.5m...that should put a sparkle in Deanna's eyes.  I certainly wouldn't snub my nose at that check.

 


Did you know that, as it stands (CBA), the 2007 will be an 'uncapped' year?  It's true...and it's possible there's a minority, but powerful, ownership sect that wants to see an uncapped year. 

01/24/2006: This isn't a cap update and to be honest I haven't checked to see if there's been any new "futures" FA signings...  Oh well...enough of my rambling.  I'm looking forward to the FA season, then draft.  I've seen some recent discussions WRT how many needs (player replacement) the Packers have.  I don't agree with the contention but what the hay, it's their opinion.  Mine is TT's looking to win now, not three years from now, will look to score a few very good additions to the team and is confident in the guys he wants to return.  I do not believe he thinks a full-blown team rebuild is necessary and think he's confident Brett will return (but, obviously, all of this is JMO). 

FA is going to be really interesting...sign your own guys and dabble with the outside market.  It's much like the draft but you should have a better read on how well the players can play in the NFL.  Retaining Kampman and/or Grady is most intriguing to me.  Grady is a really, really tough call...but I make him a firm offer, with little wiggle room, then let him test the market.  They definitely need to replace Mark Roman (which shouldn't be hard).  Offensively they obviously need a solid playing guard but I'm confident they'll be fine at center regardless who gets the call (Flanny, Wells, or White).  Here's some additional FA links:  (S, CB)

The draft...aahhhhh, to pick #5...they should get a top prospect.  Not sure what TT's "big board" looks like but there's no question he's looked closely at guys like AJ Hawk, Super Mario, Jimmy Williams, D'Brickshaw Ferguson, Michael Huff, and (my darkhorse) 'Nagata' or maybe he should/could be called "Nah, I got Ya!"  I subscribe to the WarRoom and almost always like their player analysis...and in many ways, count on them.  Btw, here's their current "mock draft" if you like those things.

Anyway, Ted Thompson has a lot of player personnel experience and I'm looking forward to the moves he's going to make this off-season.  I think he'll make enough of them...

01/12/2006: I updated the 2006 cappage.  I screwed-up on Brett's PR$B (-$400k).  I also added two columns: 'Pre-Jun* caphit' and 'Post-Jun caphit', the purpose should be evident.  The guys that do not have numbers in those columns (i.e., blanks) are players I'm convinced will be on the final 2006 roster.  I've also added 2006 FA lists for OL, LB, and RB.  None of the lists are not racked'n'stacked by my preference except for the top 5-10 players.  Some of my preferred FAs will most likely be TAGed.

01/08/2006: Well, we're in the off-season now...funny/sad not being able to watch the Packers in the playoffs.  I'm sad Sherman was fired too...  Oh well, shit happens.  March onward to 2006, and may good things happen; winning ways return.  There will be lots of draft talk until it happens.  I've already seen lots and have participated.  Should get a good one at number five...  Still, they cannot overlook FA.  Why?...because it starts before the draft.

Currently, for 2006, my WAG is the Packers have at least $20+ million to play with and 53 players under contract.  The "Rule of 51" is in effect.  They're in GREAT SHAPE cap wise to spend big bucks!  ...but still leave a nice cushion for 2006 reserve spending just in case.  My $20+ million WAG is based on speculation the cap will be $90 million...it could be more.  I'm also guessing the Pack was able to 'carry forward' at least an additional $1 million or more into 2006.

I haven't compiled a full listing of the FA positions for 2006.  However, I know Steve Hutchinson's contract expires and he made $2.5m in 2005.  I think the Seahawks will TAG him but I tell ya, if they let him test the market I'd be the first caller...  Ted Thompson was in Seattle when Hutch was drafted but I don't know if Hutch was "Ted's Guy" or not.  Besides, Holmgren was and is grand puba out there.  Title doesn't mean anything if you have the power.  Anyway, I digress...the Pack has $$ to spend.

I've looked at safeties not under contract in 2006.  Adam Archuleta is on the list and *maybe* the Rams let him test the waters.  I really like him as a player/playmaker.  He would be a tremendous upgrade over Mark Roman.  I haven't looked closely at OL other than Hutchinson (LG) and Toni Fonuti (RG).  They're really the only two I'm enamored with.  Fonuti is simply a monster!  There is a massive number of RBs entering FA...

I say look to FA first, then fill-in via draft but certainly take your highest rated players on the draft board.

Unofficial Green Bay Packers Salary Cap home page

CounterData.com

affiliates
affiliates Counter