|
VI
… generalizations
about the effects …
When Deer Park’s grade-schooler
tossed a rock in the direction of the Atlas E, he was throwing the first type
of ballistic missile used by humans at what may yet prove to be the last.
From rocks to rockets, artillery’s progression has been punctuated by leaps in
destructiveness. In concept, there is little difference between a Roman
artillery catapult throwing projectiles of burning resin, and the thermonuclear
warhead sitting atop a guided missile — except that one might incinerate a
wooden ship, the other a modern city.
Atlas ballistic missile crews were not made aware of the explosive yield of
their rocket’s warhead. They knew the warhead’s power was significantly
larger then the bombs used against Japan.
Beyond that, they could only speculate.
Both atomic bombs dropped on Japan
were classified as fission weapons — meaning the atoms in the core were being
split into lighter elements, and in the process liberating energy. The Hiroshima
bomb, Little Boy, used 132 pounds of uranium-235 as its fissionable
material. Although only a small amount of that actually converted into
energy, it produced an explosion equivalent to fifteen thousand tons of
TNT. The Nagasaki bomb, Fat
Man, used 13.6 pounds of plutonium, and produced an explosion equivalent to twenty-one
thousand tons of TNT.
Deer Park’s Atlas missile used a
warhead designated by the military as type W-38 — believed to have an output of
about three million, seven hundred and fifty thousand tons of TNT. This
was a fission/fusion weapon. Though commonly called, a hydrogen bomb,
it’s also known as a two-stage Teller-Ulam implosion device.
Different from the cracking of atoms in fission weapons, the fusion process
produces energy the same general way the sun does. Energy is created by
combining two light elements — usually isotopes of hydrogen — into a heavier
element. The byproduct of this conversion is intense radiation.
Although the actual designs are classified, the general details of how various
types of thermonuclear bombs work have been released. We know that the
hydrogen isotopes used as fusion material in the bomb’s second stage need to be
severely heated and compressed to trigger the fusion process. The only
non-theoretical way known to produce that much heat and pressure is to use a Hiroshima
or Nagasaki style fission bomb as
the initiator.
This first stage plutonium/uranium trigger, in a shaped radiation implosion,
compresses the lithium-deuteride core of the bomb’s second stage. Lithium
is a metal, only half as dense as water. Because of its chemical
reactivity, it only occurs in nature in combination with other elements or
compounds. The other fusion material, deuterium, is an isotope of
hydrogen that combines with oxygen to form ‘heavy water’. When
overwhelmed by the pressure of the neutrons produced in the atomic blast and
then reflected by the inner case of the bomb to compress the lithium-deuteride
core from all sides, the lithium part breaks down into tritium, a radioactive
isotope of hydrogen, and into the element helium. Under the intense heat
and pressure of the blast, the new tritium and original deuterium fuse into
more helium, and in the process, liberate an explosive flood of energy.
The difference between the explosive power of early fission and modern fusion
devices is startling. One way to visualize this difference is to explode
each device in the air and measure the diameter of the initial fireball.
This fireball is produced by the outward expansion of a shell of super-heated
gas. The gas is formed when the nuclear explosion sends a wave of
radiation outward, compressing and heating the air. This plasma is
initially pushing outward at several million miles an hour — thus the nuclear
shockwave. The fireball itself is defined by the edge of the plasma’s
visible luminosity.
A Hiroshima size blast should
produce a fireball about six-hundred and fifty feet across. The weapon
detonated over Nagasaki could have
burned a seven-hundred and twenty foot wide hole in the sky. But the
Atlas missile’s W-38 warhead would produce an airburst fireball one mile,
six-hundred and twenty five feet in diameter. This says nothing of the
destruction that would radiate outward from the edge of that plasma front.
If a Russian device of similar size to the Atlas warhead had been detonated
above Deer Park’s missile base,
certain generalizations about the effects of that blast can be calculated.
If the airburst had been close enough to the ground for a good portion of the
plasma front to contact the earth, energy would have been reflected back into
the fireball, increasing its size. This enlarged fireball could reach a
mile and a half across, overrunning the northeastern segments of the municipal
airport’s runways. This fireball would have remained visible for just
over eight seconds. As the fireball rolled overhead, anything organic
that had not been buried deep underground would be reduced to superheated
powder, and either fused into the earth, or blow away.
At two and a half miles from ground zero, the outermost zone of ionizing
radiation would just brush Deer Park’s
eastern city limits. Assuming an individual could somehow survive the
other detonation effects, this radiation, knocking electrons from the atoms
inside the living body, would chemically ionize the tissues. The
mortality expectation for an ionized organism could run as high as 90 percent.
About the same area would be exposed to very high overpressure — overpressure
being an expression of the power of the shockwave produced by the blast.
The overpressure at the outside edge of this zone would have decreased to 20
pounds per square inch — meaning every square foot of structure or person
facing the blast would be slammed with a punch equivalent to one ton of
weight. Nothing except broken stubs of the heaviest and most anchored
portion of any structure would be left standing from this 20 pound boundary
inward to ground zero.
Any number of factors can determine how effective a bomb will be. The
type of target determines the burst altitude, and the burst altitude and
weather conditions at the target determine the area over which the destruction
will spread. If the intent was to root out a hardened or buried
structure, such as the bunker, the incoming ordinance would have been detonated
at the surface, or slightly above. If the intention was to cause the
maximum damage over the widest possible area, then the bomb would be detonated
five to ten thousand feet overhead.
If the bomb had exploded closes to its optimal altitude for maximum widespread
damage, then, seven miles out from the center of the blast, the overpressure
would still exceed 4 pounds. That means the east wall of the old Clayton
schoolhouse, at just under seven miles from ground zero, would be hit with of
shockwave in the neighborhood of 320 tons.
Rick Hodges, an experienced mechanical engineer and structural designer,
commented, “To put it in perspective, the building codes for this area require
designing for a 20 pounds per square foot wind load. Along the gulf coast
of Florida — hurricane country —
that number is fifty pounds per square foot. The indicated 4 pounds per
square inch overpressure equals 576 pounds per square foot — over 10 times the
design requirement for hurricanes. In fact, I would guess that the force
on the east side of the building would exceed the building’s total
weight. If the building could have somehow managed to hold together, that
force could have potentially rip it from the ground and rolled it over like a
child’s toy block. I can’t think of any above ground structure in the
Deer Park/Clayton area that could have remained standing against such a shock
wave unless it was shielded by intervening hills.”
The tonnage striking the school is the total calculated against a monolithic
wall. Hit with such a blow, the windows of the old school would have
moved inward with the shockwave. As the shockwave moved into the building
through those openings, it would have increased the internal pressure and
somewhat countered, somewhat lessened the pressure being exerted on the
exterior wall. Whether this lessening would have allowed any portion of
the un-reinforced brick walls of the old school to survive is doubtful.
Any such calculations of effects at a distance are extremely rough
estimates. The closer to the blast one moves, the less uncertainty
exists.
Though the Riverside school, approximately three miles to the east of the
detonation site, is somewhat protected by the land rising to the west, the
altitude of the blast — the eye of the airburst fireball being clearly visible
from the school — insures that nothing but the foundation would have remained.
As for any humans or animals in the area — overpressures in excess of five
pounds per square inch can rupture eardrums. At fifteen pounds per square
inch, irreversible lung damage can occur — the same blast-lung effect often
suffered by people too close to a conventional chemical explosion. At greater
overpressures, the shockwave moving through the body releases energy anytime it
moves across any density boundary — such as between muscle and bone, or between
tissue and air. This released energy causes hemorrhage of the tissue —
causes bleeding in the flesh deep inside the body.
Accompanying this static overpressure shockwave would be a short-lived dynamic
overpressure — a sudden blast of wind. In the vicinity of Clayton, the
wind, for several seconds, would blow away from ground zero at between 125 and
150 miles an hour. This would immediately be followed by a gust, nearly
as strong, in the opposite direction. The closer to the fireball, the
stronger this wind. This dynamic pulse would pick up and throw objects
and creatures, slamming them against each other, and against static surfaces.
As bad as the above may be, it all follows what could potentially be the most,
or the least, widespread of the explosion’s damaging effects — and it all
depends on the weather. If the sky was clear of haze or clouds,
regardless of it being day or night, the initial flash of light from the
explosion, part of that first flood of radiation, would set the countryside on
fire.
Draw a circle 24 miles in diameter — twelve miles in every direction from
ground zero. At the edge of that circle any exposed human flesh would
suffer a third degree burn — would be burned completely through the skin, down
to the underlying tissue. Every foot closer to ground zero would increase
the depth of the burn. Mildly put, in the event of nuclear war, and the
collapse of effective medical care, any burn covering more than a few inches of
skin would likely, over time, be fatal. Treatment of the infections, and
the skin grafts necessary to cover such wounds would be non-existent for the
vast majority. The worse the wound, the less time to suffer.
To give it some perspective, that circle would touch Sacheen
Lake in the north, the top of Mount
Spokane to the east, the top of Scoop
Mountain to the west, and
Wandermere Golf Course to the south.
If the sky were overcast, this burn radius would be severely reduced.
In cold weather or at night, the number of people exposed, due to being inside
or heavily dressed, would be relatively small. But the flash, over much
of that circle, would also cause dry, exposed combustibles to burst into
flames. While some burning buildings, haystacks, automobile interiors and
the like would be extinguished by the dynamic shockwave’s blast of wind, others
would just add fuel to the ensuing firestorm.
While the likelihood of a 3.75 megaton bomb detonating over Deer Park’s missile
bunker was almost nil, the Atlas missile’s warhead would most certainly be
falling on a densely populated military, industrial, or civilian target over
there — with the same effect.
Regardless of what the missileers
did or didn’t know about the potential energy contained in the Atlas missile’s
warhead, one thing the entire world suspected was that the nuclear weapons the
Russians had aimed at America — due to the extra lifting capacity of the giant
Soviet rockets, and to compensate for the greater margin of targeting error
expected from their rockets — were much larger than those America was aiming
back.
| To assure that the American warhead could survive the 15,000 mile per hour
plunge back into Earth’s atmosphere, an aero-dynamic re-entry vehicle was
fitted around the W-38 warhead. This vehicle was divided into three
distinct sections. The nose was a blunted bullet shape. |

Mark IV ballistic
re-entry vehicle containing a W-38 thermonuclear warhead mounted to the
nose of one of Fairchild's 567th Strategic Missile Squadron's complex
housed Atlas E missiles. |
Next, a
long cylindrical shaft about two and a half feet thick containing the
warhead. Last, an outward flaring tail to give the vehicle a
shuttlecock
shape — a shape assuring that atmospheric drag would pull and
hold the vehicle
in a nose first position during reentry. Systems for arming the
warhead
were installed in the auxiliary equipment container at the back of the
vehicle.The entire package was just under 7 feet long, weighed 3,330
pound — 3,080 for
the warhead, 250 pounds for the re-entry vehicle.
Surfaces of the vehicle exposed to heating during reentry were covered with a
partially ablating material — meaning the surface would char away, carrying the
frictional heat produced by atmospheric drag with it. Below this skin was
an insulating layer.
The re-entry vehicle was fitted to the missile after the missile was secured to
its horizontal launch boom in the launch bay. The re-entry package
arrived at the site on its own specialized transporter. Backed into the
launch bay, it was positioned under the missile’s nose. The transporter’s
hydraulic cradle lifted the payload into position for mating.
The vehicle was fitted under tension to the missile’s adapter ring. Once
the missile reached separation altitude, and the holding mechanism detached
itself, the stored tension would assure a clean separation. As the
re-entry vehicle began moving away from the missile, retro-rockets on the Atlas
would back the missile away from the payload.
As for working in the launch bay when the warhead was attached to the missile,
the missileers expressed no concern. Even in the worse case scenario — a
fully fueled upright rocket exploding, and its warhead collapsing into the pool
of burning fuel and oxidizer — there was only an infinitesimal chance of a
radiation leak. And no chance at all of a spontaneous nuclear detonation.
Jack Roberts states, “The munitions people most likely did some radiation
testing when installing and removing the warhead. As for the maintenance
crews, I don’t recall us doing routine radiation sweeps of the launch bay.”
“There was a hand held radiation monitor on site,” Jim Geoghegan
recalled. “We tested once in awhile. But it never seemed to be an
issue.”
The attitude of the missile maintenance crews seemed to be that the warhead was
just something stuck on the front of their rocket, and, as long as it didn’t get
in the way of their work, of little concern.
|