| Cite: 3-901 - 3-934 | Enacted: Unknown | Repealed: Unknown |
| Source: Dumblaws.com | ||
Discussion:
It is unknown from the above reference which type of cactus is being referred to here, though the author of the reference was likely referring to Arizona's state flower, the Saguaro (cereus giganteus) cactus (as defined in 41-855.) Dumblaws.com specifically states that the reason for the law is because: "The Saguaro cactus, treasured by Arizonians, has been endangered by those who find pleasure in shooting or cutting down cacti. Thus, a law was passed to protect the cactus.". Unfortunately, Dumblaws.com offers no cite to specific laws to back up their claims.
Lucky for them however, we have found cites to the laws for them. Of course, the law does not offer any specific sentencing guidelines to back up the claim of 25 years in prison, nor does it specifically state the Saguaro as a protected plant, but it does cover the destruction of native plants. The law only covers naturally growing plants; cultivated or human propagated plants are not protected under the law. And it also does not specifically prevent a land owner from destroying the plants if they follow the law and give notice to the Arizona Department of Agriculture. There are other exemptions we won't go into.
There are many other states that have similar laws, so why this is labelled a "stupid law" is questionable. Wildlife protection is definately something that most state governments strive for.
Attributes, Sources, External Pro/Con-Links