The
following quotation, by Morton Edgar, an ardent and long-time supporter
of Charles Taze Russell, is from time to time sent to me as evidence that
Russell was honest in his use of the available data regarding the measurements
of the Great Pyramid. I have reproduced it here so that you can read for
yourself just what Edgar is saying and you can decide if this exonerates
Russell. At the end of the quotation, I give my own thoughts on the matter.
You may have
noted that, in his early editions of Vol. III of 'Studies in the
Scriptures," in the Pyramid chapter, Brother Russell states
that the length of the Descending Passage, from the junction of
the Ascending Passage down to the Subterranean Chamber, is 3416
inches. But in all later editions of his third volume, since 1905,
the length of this passage has been altered to the extent of 41
inches, the length now being said to be 3457 inches. Formerly the
north wall of the Subterranean Chamber was said to mark the date
1874 A.D., but with the new measure of 3457 inches this date was
shifted forward 41 years to 1915 A.D. No explanation is given for
this change. (See, however, the short article, 'The
Great Pyramid Measurements," on page 326 of 1st Nov., 1904,
'Watch Tower.")
We [that is,
Morton and his brother John] measured this passage in 1909, having
first removed from it all obstructing debris, we found that neither
the earlier published length of 3416 inches, nor the later published
length of 3457 inches, was correct. The true length was found to
be more nearly 3385 'Pyramid" inches. (The exact length is
3384.904 'Pyramid" inches.) As will be seen, this is 31 inches
less than the first of Brother Russell's figures, and 72 inches
less than his later one.
We, of course,
immediately communicated with Brother Russell the true length of
the Descending Passage. At first sight it appeared as if we would
require to abandon the time-measurements of this lower part of the
Pyramid's passage system, the true length being so different from
what we had previously understood it to be. Yet, strange to say,
instead of abandoning the time-measurements, we found that the true
length of the passage established these time-measurements all the
more thoroughly. Both dates, 1874 and 1914, are now seen to be indicated
by the end of this Descending Passage. This indication is very exact
and convincing, and goes far to establish our faith in the Great
Pyramid as indeed a building of God. |
| Source:
Morton Edgar's 1929 Discourse: "THE GREAT PYRAMID -- Why Was
It Built? Who Built It?", (reprinted in "Great Pyramid Passages"
by John and Morton Edgar, 1976 edition). |
____________
My comments:
Three things are asserted here:
(1) both sets of measurements that Russell used were inaccurate;
(2) in 1909 or thereabout, Morton and his brother John informed Russell
of the correct measurements; and
(3) ultimately it does not matter what figures Russell used because ALL
figures - even the wrong ones - yield the correct dates.
By themselves,these
three things do not at all exonerate Russell. And it gets even worse when
you consider the fact that Russell never used the correct measurements
even though he was informed about them in 1909/1910.
The claim
that Russell's figures (although wrong) can be used in some equations
to get the right (i.e. desired) answer has no bearing on the question
of his honesty. In addition, the argument from math just doesn't work.
When I was in grade school my geometry teacher still took points off when
I got the right answer, but arrived at it accidentally! It's like that
in the real world too.
Chuck
jellogator@cox.net
C.
Piazzi Smyth, Charles Taze Russell, and the Great Pyramid of Gizeh
Analysis
of Watch Tower "Truth" |