"Non-elevated" profile (no deep inversion)  that suggests little potential for supercell tornadoes

 

Example 4a.  This environment has marginal shear-CAPE combinations and poor vertical wind shear with a high LCL, and therefore appears unlikely to support much in the way of supercell tornadoes.  While some might call this an "elevated" profile due to the high LCL (resulting a high cloud base) and elongated area of CIN, it doesn't have the deep inversion that other strongly elevated examples have (see "elevated" supercell examples).  Profiles like this are common in late spring and summer, particularly in the plains.

(RUC-2 analysis profile at Tekamah, Nebraska, 00 UTC 6/19/01, updated by 00 UTC surface obs at TQE-OMA):
nontor1.gif (5704 bytes)   061901rd0047a.gif (11021 bytes) OAX base refl. 0047 UTC 6/19/01

Observed:   Brief F0 tornado (no damage), supercell otherwise nontornadic (1.75" hail)

total ML CAPE  3886 J/kg    0-1 km SRH  63 m2/s2

  parameter value support for supercell tornadoes? why? comments
0-1k EHI    1.5 marginal < 2.0  
BL-6k shear 24 kts poor < 30 kts  
LCL height 1509 m poor > 1500 m  
        parameters "poor" to "marginal"
CIN 81 J/kg ok < 100 J/kg  
LFC height  2106 marginal > 2000 m  
0-3k CAPE  29 J/kg poor/marginal near 30 J/kg  

description and key for examples
operational low-level thermodynamic parameter guidelines

 

Example 4b.  Even though low-level thermodynamic parameters here are favorable, the wind fields are weak, resulting in poor shear-CAPE combinations and generally poor vertical shear.  Even though there is good turning with height on the wind profile, winds below 500 mb are only around 10 kts or less.  The weak wind fields suggest little potential for significant supercell tornadoes.

(RUC-2 analysis profile at Newton, Kansas, 23 UTC 9/17/01, updated by 23 UTC surface ob at EWK):
nontor3.gif (5508 bytes)   091701rd2300icta.gif (12130 bytes) ICT base refl. 9/17/01 2300 UTC

Observed:   Nontornadic supercell with 1.75" hail

total ML CAPE  2615 J/kg    0-1 km SRH  28 m2/s2

  parameter value support for supercell tornadoes? why? comments
0-1k EHI    0.5 poor > 3.0 shear-CAPE combinations are
BL-6k shear 30 kts marginal/poor = 30 kts "poor" and wind fields are weak,
LCL height 366 m strong < 1000 m even though low-level
        thermodynamic factors are
CIN 54 J/kg ok < 100 J/kg favorable
LFC height  1185 m strong < 1500 m  
0-3k CAPE  151 J/kg strong > 90 J/kg  

description and key for examples
operational low-level thermodynamic parameter guidelines

back to examples page