In January 2007 the AKA Regional Director of Region One, Robert 'Woody' Woods was given 30 days notice of an impending vote of the Board of Directors on February 20 to decide whether to remove him as a Regional Director.

Impeach:

1. a. To make an accusation against.

b. To charge (a public official) with improper conduct in office before a proper tribunal.

2. To challenge the validity of; try to discredit:

Proposed Removal of AKA Region One Regional Director

This page was originally written on February 1, 2007 in an attempt to bring some cohesiveness to all the comminucations regarding the proposed removal of American Kitefliers Association Region One Regional Director Robert 'Woody' Woods. Posts and Replies were sent to no less than 6 different Kite E-mail Groups in and around Region One. This is an attempt to gather them all in one place. If you think one is missing, please let me know.

E-mail addy's were sanitized to prevent bots from picking them up for spam.

All E-mails represented here were posted to various E-Mail Groups in the Northeast.

The meeting of the Board of Directors to vote whether to remove Woody will take place on February 20, 2007.

RELEVANT BYLAWS

By-Laws of the American Kitefliers Association as amended October 4, 2006

ARTICLE IV. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Section 13. Removal of Regional Directors

2. By the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors by a three-fourths (3/4) vote of those present at any meeting may remove a Regional or At-Large Director for activity which in the judgement of the Directors is prejudicial to the best interests of the Association. Written notice of intent to remove a Director must be given to the Director thirty (30) days in advance of the meeting.

The following Bylaws say that meetings are open to Members.
Minutes of the meetings are made available.
ARTICLE V. MEETINGS AND ELECTIONS OF DIRECTORS

Section 3. All Board meetings shall be open, except during Executive Session, to all members of the Association. Only members of the Board of Directors may vote.

ARTICLE VII. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE

Section 1. The Executive Committee shall be composed of the officers of the Association and remaining the Directors-at-large not serving as Officers.

Section 2. The Executive Committee shall have the authority to conduct the affairs of the Association between meetings of the Board of Directors. The Committee shall take no action in conflict with the actions of the Board of Directors or the membership.

Section 3. Meetings of the Executive Committee shall be open to all members and Regional Directors, except in Executive Session, but only Executive Committee members may vote.

To: nekite, ConnectiKITERS, Jeremy Johannesen

From: WOODY

Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 18:14:28 EST

Subject: [connectikiters] Region One Directors Removal

Hello everyone, I'm sending you my Region One Report because the President of the AKA found it to be so negative that she contacted the executive committee to have me removed as Region One Director. Last Wednesday night the entire Board of Directors voted to send me a 30 day notice to have me removed as the bylaws state. There will be another meeting on Feb 20th to officially have me removed as Regional Director. This is something personal against me directed by the new AKA President Sue Skinner. She did not give me the courtesy of a phone call or an e-mail to ask if I could change my RD report but went right to the board to proceed with my removal. I'll be the first to tell you that I have rocked the boat more than once and this is what I get for it. I was willing to change my report but she wouldn't hear of it. She wants me out and that's that as far as she is concerned. I'm not here to bash her and I won't. Those of you who know her know what I mean. It was a pleasure serving Region One and believe me when I tell you Region One was well represented. The only RD's to stand up for me were Region Two and Region Three and I am grateful to them. This just goes to show that we East Coasters see things a little different then our leaders on the West Coast. If any of you feel like sending her an e-mail on my behalf please do or you can call her. Her e-mail address and phone number are listed in Kiting Magazine. Whatever happened to freedom of speech or freedom of the press. What she wants is more yes men and less hassle. Obviously there is no room in the AKA for a difference of opinion. Below you will find my entire Region One Report as I submitted it.

Region One Director

Woody Woods

Hello Everyone, I have a short report this issue with nothing really to report on other then Art St. Pierre and Beth Bowen were married in a private ceremony in late December. When you see these two love birds be sure to look at their wedding rings.They had them custom made. Now they can both go to bed with their Rev's and fly team all night long. Way to go Airplay ; ) Not much going on at all around here as far as kite's go. The Holidays were busy and winter never really set in as of mid January. From the sounds of it a good time was had by all at first night Boston. No word on any indoor fly's as I write this I am hoping someone starts one up soon. AKA Membership is going down the tubes and with the increase in dues; that I did not vote in favor of, I'm sure the numbers will be bleak to say the least. I've said it before and I'll say it again if you want to pay your dues please do and if not that's up to you I promise I won't bug you. I'll leave that up to your next regional director. I plan on having fun in my last few months as your RD. I also want everyone to please practice safe kiting this coming kite season. I hear more and more stories about people getting hurt by kites and the people who fly them. I'm not just talking about traction kites. People are getting killed by fighter kites in India and people are getting hurt flying sport kites. Even a runaway Barbie kite can hurt someone so please be careful and watch out for others. We don't want to loose our flying fields because of some inexperienced flyers or a careless mistake. So far the new President of the AKA has been quiet so I have nothing further to tell you all. The best thing I can say is get involved with your local kite club and have a blast.

Best Winds,

Woody

Reminder - Do not edit my report without letting me know first. Thank you very much.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: RE: [NEKITE] Region One Directors Removal

Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:09:05 -0500

From: Reed Family

Don't we as Members of the AKA have a say in who we want to represent us?
I voted for Woody and that is who should represent me.

Congrats Art and Beth

Ralph Reed

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] Region One Directors Removal

Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:15:06 EST

From: STEVE SANTOS

>In a message dated 1/21/2007 7:06:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, rreed3 writes:
>Don't we as Members of the AKA have a say in who we want to represent us?
>I voted for Woody and that is who should represent me.

I agree with Ralph and think the President & board are over reacting. Everyone has a right to their opinion and should be able to voice it, even if you do not agree. After all, this is the USA.

Steve Santos

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] Region One Directors Removal

Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:55:28 -0500

From: Gary Engvall

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE]

Um, er, well, there is the USA, and then there is the AKA.
Different rules.
You gotta have rules.
An AKA Regional Director once told me that.
It's only kites.
An AKA Regional Director once told me that.

THANK YOU WOODY.
You gave it a good run.

The President of the AKA over-react?
Bite your tongue!
That would insinuate there's politics in kiting.
Politics in kiting?
Aw, c'mon.
Kiting is as pure as the driven slush.

THANK YOU WOODY.
You gave it a good run.

good heavens;
gary engvall

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [NEKITE] "Woody" Woods

Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:05:06 -0500

From: Marty Sasaki

To: Susan Skinner

CC: New England KITEflyers Regional Mailing List [NEKITE]

Today I received a disturbing piece of email from the NEKITE mailing list from our Regional Director to the AKA. In the note Woody says that he is being removed from the AKA board by a vote of the board members. Woody claims that the reason is the content of his yet to be published report, which he included with his note.

Removal of a board member is a big deal so I assume that the board debated this. I remember several board meetings that I "attended" that considered similar circumstances and the decisions were difficult to make. Having said this, I have to ask, what is the real reason for this vote?

I admit, Woody could have been a bit more tactful, but I see nothing in his note that is more than expressing his opionion. Certainly he deserved a request to possibly edit his report. I understand the desire to present the AKA in a good light, but to actually remove a board member for a difference in opinion is obviously over-reacting. Frankly I see nothing "wrong" with his report and feel that he has been doing a good job on the board.

I was delighted to hear the good news about Art and Beth.

So please explain the reasons for this removal of Woody. What is the "official" reason for this action? What were the results of the vote (those for and those against)?

Thank you for your time.

Marty Sasaki

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] "Woody" Woods

Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:18:17 EST

From: WOODY

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE]

In a message dated 1/21/2007 9:05:40 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, Marty Sasaki writes:

> So please explain the reasons for this removal of Woody. What is the "official" reason for this action? What were the results of the vote (those for and those against)?

Check this out Marty. She's a tough person to take too.

OK now that I had 24 hours to think about this I say to myself Dam she's a hot head. Phil sent her a copy of my RD report that he thought needed editing and how was he going to handle me.She flew off the handle and went straight to her executive board to have me removed as RD. She didn't even give me a courtesy e-mail to ask if I could change my report. I guess she's still mad I didn't go to Des Moines and went to Niagara instead. Then of course their was the rumor that I started a boycott against Des Moines that she later found out I had nothing to do with. I have all of those e-mails if anyone would like to see them. I'm sure there is a hidden agenda to get rid of me that stems back a few years. I'm more than willing to change my RD report and I hope many of you can see through all this as it is really personal. The members of my region love reading my RD reports and I have been told from other members from other regions that they look forward to reading my reports also look back at a few issues and see what you think yourself. I'm asking the BOD not to take a stand against me for this RD report as it is very personal between sue and myself. If you do take a stand against me be sure to speak up and be heard I want to know who it is that wants me out. If I'm removed I'm sure I'll be reelected without a doubt. As far as I know right now there are two people who were going to run in the next election for my RD position I had no plans to run again .I can tell you right now if I am removed either myself or my wife Joan will be running for RD this coming Oct. Think about that Suzie.

Thanks for your time

Woody

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] "Woody" Woods

Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:29:43 -0500

From: Marty Sasaki

I suggest that anyone who is concerned send an email to Sue Skinner. At the very least, I think we deserve an "official" explanation.

I'm surprised that you would want to continue with the job Woody. Unless you are a real hustler, there aren't any direct reasons and a lot of reasons why you wouldn't want to continue. Thanks for the work, you've done a great job for a thankless job.

I hope this isn't an indication of what is coming for the AKA.

Marty Sasaki

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] "Woody" Woods

Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 21:41:40 -0500

From: Gary Engvall

If either or both of you run, you got two votes in this house.

Doggone it, now I gotta pass up the SJKF party and stand up in the Business Meeting again.

Sheesh.

She had to go and remove you this month?

That stinks.

I had NEXT month in the pool . . .

good heavens;

gary engvall

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [CTKiters] Support Woody - E-Petition

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 04:10:13 -0800 (PST)

From: Jeremy Johannesen

Reply-To: CTKiters@yahoogroups.com

To: NYKE , NE KITE , CTKiters Egroup <CTKiters@yahoogroups.com>, KitesinCNYskies

Greetings Kiters,

Show your support for Woody in only TWO CLICKS!

I have set-up an e-petition, all you need to do is
click the link below, add your 'signature' and hit
submit.

The petition reads:

"I support Robert 'Woody' Woods as Region I Director
and wish to express my opinion that he remain in the
position for the remainder of his term."

The form offers the opportunity to add your own
comments as well.

Here's the link:

http://www.nyke.org/Region I - Petition.htm

If that does not work for you, go to nyke.org and click on
"AKA Region I Director - E-petition" on the Homepage.

If enough of us make our voices heard we can prevent
this action by the AKA Board from going forward.

GO WOODY!

JEREMY.

Spread the Wind!
JEREMY.
Visit the New York Kite Enthusiasts Homepage
http://www.nyke.org
And The American Kitefliers Association
http://www.aka.kite.org

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [CTKiters] Support Woody - E-Petition

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:10:31 EST

From: VIC WALTON

Reply-To: CTKiters@yahoogroups.com

To: CTKiters@yahoogroups.com

Dear Region 1 kiters,

Bernie and I are no longer doing much kite flying and we haven't kept
connected as much as many would have hoped. So we found it at least very sad to
receive all the recent e-mails regarding efforts to politically remove the
Region I Director. We thought, "My, my. What's happened to kiting?" It's so sad
and disappointing..

Vic and Bernie Walton

PS. Warm Regards to anyone who remembers us.

Founders / CONNECTIKITERS / 1985

"Just for the fun of it."

Editor's Note: Back in the day, Vic Walton compiled a comprehensive "Directory of Kite Organizations of North America" for use by all AKA Members.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [NEKITE] The plot thickens...

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 09:57:54 -0500

From: Marty Sasaki

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE]

I sent an email to Sue Skinner asking for details about what is going on. Sue responded that due to the sensitive nature of the proceedings that things were confidential, and that Woody was region 1 board member. My next email asked more questions and ended with the question, please let me know Woody's status. Sue ignored all of my questions except the last one where she restated that Woody was a member of the board of directors. I asked pointedly whether any action was taken against Woody and whether any action is planned. No response this time, but it was late.

Looks like some "spin control" is taking place here. I'm waiting for her response to all of this now that "Woody's Army" is forming.

While I think that the e-petition is a good idea, email is better. Don't send random email, make it civil and carefully reasoned. I think we deserve an explanation.

Marty Sasaki

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] Region One Directors Removal

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 08:41:15 -0800 (PST)

From: GARY QUINTON

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE]

CC: LHSO14B, Jeremy Johannesen

Cool your jets!

As much as I support Woody, I haven't heard much from the other side. I think I need to hear at least someone on the AKA BOD make a statement regarding their decision. What led them to it, and how they made up their mind regarding this rather draconian decision. (And I don't want to wait until the next Kiting Magazine) Marty's recent post seems to indicate a stony silence from the other end. I'll wait until this evening before making my decision.

Charles, Jeremy et al, You do so much good work spreading the word about kiting that you shouldn't let the politics of the AKA stop you from continuing regardless of the outcome of these events.

Gary Quinton

----- Original Message ----

From: carlosst

To: [NEKITE]

Cc: LHSO14B; Jeremy Johannesen

Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 10:50:22 AM

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] Region One Directors Removal

Jeremy thank you for reminding us that you don't have to be a AKA member to fly a kite. Not renewing my membership is the last thing i would do. However in protest of this outrageous act on the part of our "Leaders" i am stopping all NKM activity effective now. This leaves room for further action later if needed. It's shameful to see OUR Beautiful sport reduced to this level.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] Region One Directors Removal

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:37:34 -0500

From: Carey, John

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE]

I agree wholeheartedly with Gary Quinton on this matter. I haven't heard
anything official whatsoever about this, nor do I know that the
announcement in question is the entire reason for this corrective
action. I'd enjoy to have an official statement from the president
before I'd start making a ruckus. I think I'll be contacting her via
email to see if she has anything official to say on the matter. It's too
early to start flying off the handle and boycotting AKA memberships,
however; no matter how good a guy Mr. Woods is.

-John Carey

GARY QUINTON wrote:

> Cool your jets!

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NYKE] Support Woody - E-Petition

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:19:33 -0500

From: Thom Shanken

Reply-To: NYKE

To: <NYKE>

Great work Jeremy!

In addition to the e-petition, I think Jeremy's suggestion of writing AKA president, Susan Skinner, directly is also important. Jeremy inadvertently transposed letters in that address.

The correct address is: president@aka.kite.org

Here is what I wrote under the "Subject:" heading of 'Robert "Woody" Woods removal as Region 1 Director':

Ms. Skinner,

While I know there are always two sides to a story, it would appear that an unacceptable action has been taken by you and the AKA Board.

I am writing to express my dissatisfaction with reports of the removal of our elected Region 1 representative, Mr. Robert "Woody" Woods.

I believe an immediate explanation of this action is called for, and think that any delay in your issuing of a public statement regarding this action will have detrimental effects on the association as a whole.

Sincerely,

Thomas L. Shanken

AKA Member # 11****

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] The plot thickens...

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:16:35 EST

From: RWOODS5589

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE]

Hey Marty and everyone. I have not been removed I have been issued an 30 notice of removal as the bylaws state by a vote of the BOD.

Section 13. Removal of Regional Directors

1. By the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors by a three-fourths (3/4) vote of those present at any meeting may remove a Regional or At-Large Director for activity which in the judgement of the Directors is prejudicial to the best interests of the Association. Written notice of intent to remove a Director must be given to the Director thirty (30) days in advance of the meeting.

I'm pretty sure they are looking up dirt on me to use against me. What I find real funny is my friend Glenn Davision has not said a word yet. I have Bob Hogan's AKA banner and whoever wins the election in Oct will receive it I just hope they fly it the way I did.

Woody

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] Support Woody - E-Petition

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:47:51 EST

From: Sue Moskowitz

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE], NYKE, CTKiters@yahoogroups.com, Kites in Central New York Skies

In a message dated 1/22/2007 7:10:40 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, Jeremy Johannesen writes:

> If enough of us make our voices heard we can prevent
>this action by the AKA Board from going forward.

Jeremy, thanks for setting up this e-petition and providing a comments section - it is well designed. We want to let everyone know that we utilized NYKS's e-petition to inform the AKA if they go ahead and act on this issue - thus removing Robert "Woody" Woods from his RD position - that Sue and I want our membership canceled, names removed from all mailing lists, and put a stop on my newsletter mailing. In over 20 years of organized kiting, this is an abomination!

Sorry to be so negative to an organization we once supported 110% for so many years. However, difficult times require difficult actions.

Steve Santos

former Region 1 Director - 6 years

Sue Moskowitz

President, High Flyers Flight Company – 13 years

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] The plot thickens...

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:19:44 -0500

From: Glenn Davison

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE]

Woody,

I definitely support you 100%. I've sent a message about this to Susan and I hope something happens soon to clear this up. You know that In the past three months I've been pushing the AKA to get moving on kite education. I've been completely ignored and, for the most part, my messages have gone unanswered. Although many of you know that I was thinking of running for Region 1 Director next term, these are not the conditions under which I wish to serve.

Glenn Davison

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [LHSO14B] Woody

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:41:34 -0800

From: Art Cross

Reply-To: LHSO14B

To: <LHSO14B>

I musta missed it - Why was woody ousted? Where can one read his 'questionable' report?

Art

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [LHSO14B] Re: Woody

Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:44:07 -0500

From: Todd Little

Reply-To: LHSO14B

To: LHSO14B

Art, and all the members of LHSO14B,

Please note that Woody has not been ousted. As Woody wrote, the bylaws stipulate that the board needed to give a 30 day notice for a special meeting to decide this issue.

Also, please know that the executive board (which I am not a part of) has made this recommendation after what they feel is a series of problems and incidents on Woody's part - not just this most recent report. I would ask that all AKA members keep from perpetuating rumors which may or may not be true, such as the "fact" that Woody has been ousted.

I know that Susan will soon be sending out an email to try to explain the situation within the constraints of the AKA bylaws. Unfortunately, due to these bylaws, which were put in place to maintain confidentiality to protect all parties, Woody included, not all of the pertinent information can be divulged.

The Board of Directors do want to hear what you, the members, have to say as far as Woody's performance in his position as Regional Director - that he has been promoting education to the public in the art, history, technology, and practice of building and flying kites and that he helped to advance the joys and values of all types of kiting. This information will make it easier for us (me!), as your elected representatives, to make a more informed decision about this issue.

Please feel free to write to me if you have an opinion on this issue. I thank you in advance for anything you can contribute to assist me in this decision.

Todd Little

Region 2 Director

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] Removal of region one director

Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 11:34:52 -0500

From: Carey, John

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE]

The following message has been sent to all directors, vice presidents,
and the president of the AKA as of 5pm Monday, January 22:

Directors and Vice Presidents of the AKA:

I am writing you pursuant to some noise that has been generated over the
decision to remove Regional Director Robert Woods of Region 1. On
behalf of myself and my fellow kitefliers in the Northeast United
States, I would like to request a statement regarding the circumstances
that have led to the removal of our Regional Director.

I would like this statement to include the following:

- A list detailing the action(s) or misconduct(s) effected by our
Regional Director that most directly led to this decision

- A brief explanation focusing on how the removal of this Director is in
the best interests of Region 1 and the Association

- A tally of the votes for and against, as well as any abstained votes,
cast during the meeting in which this decision was finalized

Your response will be re-sent to members of the "New England Kite
Resource" (http://nekite.org/) to clear up confusion over this decision.
I appreciate your time and effort.

If you have no knowledge of these proceedings or were not present at the
meeting in question, I apologize for sending you this message in error;
please disregard.

Thank you,

John Carey

Member, Region 1

NEKITE mailing list

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [NEKITE] [Fwd: Re: Region 1: Removal of Regional Director]

Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:28:19 -0500

From: Carey, John

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE]

Here's the response to the mail I sent to the VPs and Directors. This
seems to be what I would call a 'performance-based' corrective action.
This response leaves me with a bad taste in my mouth.

-John Carey

By now you have received a message from Susan Skinner. When we come onto the
board of directors, we agree to keep all board discussions confidential.
This is to encourage a full and open exchange. How can we now betray that
trust to all the other board members?
A vote has not been taken. A meeting has been scheduled. It was the intent
of the board to spend these 30 days discussing exactly what you are asking
for, that is a list detailing the actions and misconduct and how they
directly effect the AKA.
The dues increase was voted on at our July 2006 board meeting. It was a
voice vote. I'll copy the relevant section below for you to read. The
complete minutes are posted on the AKA website.
Pretend you are on the sales staff of your company. Now, your firm announces
a price increase that doesn't even cover inflation. You announce to all your
existing clients and all your potential clients that the price increase is
wrong, and you won't ask them to pay their invoice. How long would you hold
your job?
The board welcomes all ideas for cost cutting, fund raising and any other
proposal for improving the organization. We've worked hard to cut the price
of Kiting, yes even with all those cool color pictures, and hold the line on
insurance costs. How many local clubs could afford their own policies?
Do we wish that could had for the same price as 1999? You bet! Is it
realistic?

Barbara Meyer, vp1

Minutes of the July board meeting

H. Dues Increase - Al Sparling

Al doesn't think there is a way to meet budget without a dues increase. He
doesn't think we can rely on an ever increasing amount from auctions /
conventions to balance budget. He would like to propose a dues increase
effective Nov 1, if during convention, we have financially spectacular
convention and auction and find costs aren't as bad as now, the Executive
Committee or new Board could reverse that. Not too hopeful about that.
This increase would not totally cover the cost of inflation since the last
dues increase. Al believes an increase of $5 for a general member and $1
for family. David mentioned that Susan Skinner had done some research on
the last increase. She stated that the last increase for the general
membership was in 1999, and the last increase for additional members was in
1992. This increase doesn't quite cover inflation. She believes it was
about a $5.80 raise to account for inflation, and $1.50 for additional
members to account for inflation. Al sees this increase brining an
additional $13,000, including a worse case scenario of a 10% loss of
membership because of the dues increase.

Al moves that effective November 1, 2006, we increase dues by $5.00 for
general members and $1.00 for family members, 2nd by Jerry. Question asked
as to how we arrived at the $5.00 amount. When Al did the math with the
hole we have in the budget, with the expected loss of members as happened
last time, it is right at $500 away from what we need. He doesn't see this
as just a one-year increase in dues, so he tried to keep the raise to
minimum. David asked if after hearing the rationale for the increase if
anyone thinks it's a bad idea, doesn't agree, or wants more information.
Question was asked if all dues would increase by $5.00. Al confirmed that
the base of each general membership would go up $5.00, so that means
overseas will increase by $5.00 as well. Chuck assumes, and it was
confirmed, that we will not increase our sponsor membership. Mike Dallmer
asked about the cost of producing the new membership forms earlier in the
year. What about the old forms that are currently out in the regions? We
will have to honor them and make sure the stock being held by Mel or others
does not get distributed. Gayle stated that you can use the blank space on
the new blue forms for the price adjustment statement. David asked Mel if
anyone was upset the last time the increase was made. Mel said there
weren't many complaints. Marla asked if she should get people to sign up
before November 1 at the new or old price. Chuck reminded everyone that the
new price does not become effective before November 1. Al continued that
this date would allow the new Executive Committee the opportunity to stop
this increase. Doug mentioned that on future forms there ought to be a
disclaimer stating that dues are subject to change without notice.

No additional comments were made. Vote taken. Motion carried.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [NEKITE] The Meyer responce and Woods issue.

Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 17:22:36 +0000

From: bgywrinkle

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE]

I had planned to write to the president and copy NEKite, but after reading Ms. Meyer's response to Mr. Carey I feel compelled to add my two cents worth. I have only been involved with kiting for approximately two years and an AKA member for that amount of time. I have known Mr. Woods through indoor activities, festivals and through his activity within KONE. Although I do not always agree with his opinions or statements, I have always found him to POSITIVELY represent the AKA and its mission. With the resignation of the RD in region 12 and this issue with Mr. Woods, I believe the credability of the AKA management is becoming an issue. Additionally, this whole situation is beginning to spiral out of control.

Ms Meyer asks Mr. Carey to "Pretend you are on the sales staff of your company. Now, your firm announces a price increase that doesn't even cover inflation. You announce to all your existing clients and all your potential clients that the price increase is wrong, and you won't ask them to pay their invoice. How long would you hold your job?"

To me, this analogy, as a member of a Kiteflyers Association, indicates the distance this director and the management of AKA have come from being a club governed by its members. Now maybe I've missed something along the line here, but as far as I can see, I am a member who pays the invoice in advance of receiving the services and products of AKA. Additionally, Mr woods is ELECTED to represent his region to AKA and is not just a salesman for AKA. Mr. Woods in his draft never said or implied we should not pay our dues, indeed he say "if you want to pay your dues please do and if not that's up to you." Isn't that how this thing works to begin with?

When I see responces like Ms Meyer's and Ms. Skinner's "A message from the AKA for Region 1" of the 23rd, I realize how far AKA has moved from being an association of people who fly kites and just have fun.

In this era of divisiveness and closed-door deals it is imperative that the management and directors of AKA adopt a transparent approach to governance, refraining from hiding behind vows of silence and "Robert' Rules". Only then will the membership be certain there are no hidden agendas and that the actions of the BOD are valid.

If the issue of Mr. Woods probable termination waits until Feb 20 for resolution, the damage to the AKA will be far greater than anything Mr. Woods could have done with the publication of his Region one report.

Regards,

Don Tuff

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] Region One Directors Removal

Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 12:05:11 -0500

From: Carey, John

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE]

As per the AKA Bylaws, the "Executive Session" is the only meeting that
shall not be made public to the membership. There exist only two
occurrences of "Executive Session" in the Bylaws, neither of which
defines the term. Since the Bylaws is the only document I'm aware of
that addresses the types and frequencies of board meetings, I am
assuming no document anywhere defines the term "Executive Session", and
even if another document did cover that topic it would be irrelevant in
the context of the Bylaws.

Therefore, the meeting in question was a public meeting and the
proceedings are yours, and my, business.

-John Carey

To: "New England KITEflyers Regional Mailing List" [NEKITE], "NYKE" <NYKE>, "LHSO14B" <LHSO14B>, "CTkiters" <CTKiters@yahoogroups.com>, "Connect-post" <ConnectiKITERS>

From: "Maggie Engvall"

Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 22:20:29 -0500

Subject: [connectikiters] Removal of region one director

I go along with several people's statements:

Ralph Reed wrote:
>
>Don't we as Members of the AKA have a say in who we want to represent us?
>I voted for Woody and that is who should represent me.

Gary Engvall wrote:
>
>The President of the AKA over-react?
>Bite your tongue!
>That would insinuate there's politics in kiting.
>Politics in kiting?
>Aw, c'mon.
>Kiting is as pure as the driven slush.

Steve Santos wrote:
>
>Everyone has a right to their opinion and should be able to voice it, even if you do not agree. After all, this is the USA.

Marty Sasaki wrote:
>
>Certainly he deserved a request to possibly edit his report. I understand the desire to present the AKA in a good light, but to actually remove a board member for a
>difference in opinion is obviously over-reacting. Frankly I see nothing "wrong" with his report and feel that he has been doing a good job on the board.

If it is a personal vendetta then it should be kept private. I did not think the regional directors report written by Woody was negative. Could it have been edited, yes. That is not a reason to remove a director that MEMBERS are happy with. I have heard rumors before that certain people wanted to remove Woody because he is out-spoken and will not accept different agendas to be pushed through.

I would like to see Woody remain as region one director.

Maggie

To: ConnectiKITERS

From: Patrick Chasse

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 18:04:10 EST

Subject: Re: [connectikiters] Removal of region one director

If I knew there'd be this much political B.S., I'd not have bothered joining. I'm considering not renewing....

Patrick Chasse

To: NYKE, LHSO14B, CTKiters@yahoogroups.com, ConnectiKITERS

From: WOODY

Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:30:46 EST

Subject: [connectikiters] Re: Reconsider Woody Region 1 Director Removal "Proposals"

This is in response to Barbara Meyer's e-mail about my proposals.

First let me start off with this business about me saying I was already removed as RD . I'm pretty sure I did not say that at all. It's just another one of those things I say that the BOD twists around to make me look bad. I'm sure everyone is clear that I have been given a 30 day written notice that the BOD may remove me on Feb 20th. That being said let's talk about Woody's proposals over the last few years.

My very first proposal 2005 was to give our Executive Director Mel Hickman a $2,000 raise. I'm not sure how many of you know Mel but let me tell you he is the hardest working member, executive and paid employee of the AKA. Not to mention a real gentlemen and all around nice guy. This proposal not only was shot down but I couldn't believe some of the comments made about Mel by some senior AKA officers. Later a survey was sent out asking how much contact each RD and executive committee members have with Mel. I know a cover up when I see one and this was one for sure. Al Sparling our old treasure was really against Mel for reasons I don't know. He was complaining about Mel not getting back to him fast enough and such so I had to speak up and say "If I was Mel you would wait even longer." (Not a popular comment)

Please note that the BOD had no problem giving a $2000 raise to Maggie Vols the AKA's convention manager bringing her from $20,000 to $22,000 per year. I don't know how many of you know Maggie or have met her. From my observations and my view point she seems like a nice enough lady, very organized and professional. I feel that she is overpaid for helping out at our convention for one week out of the year. I know there is a lot of prep work for the convention manager but it's the convention chair that does a lot of the site location research and site evaluations.

My second proposal was to try and stop the AKA from going to Des Moines, Iowa for convention. This was a huge battle for me and I was being asked by my region members to please try and stop this location for a more desirable location. I can't began to tell you how much flack I took for this. I mean more that you can ever imagine. I was made out to be a BAD BAD BOY after that. This issue still haunts me and I get it thrown in my face more often that most people could stand by the BOD.

My third proposal was to help raise funds for the AKA through an e-bay auction. Hey this one was looking like it might work out ok. I wasn't getting a lot of support from the BOD but I was getting some. Mel set up an e-bay account and we started to get donations from BOD members asking members, kite shops and manufacturers for donations for the e-bay auction. I myself being a fighter kite flyer was putting together the best fighter kite box ever starting with a custom fighter box filled to the gills with fighters from the best builders in the country. This would have been a priceless item and still is. The e-bay auction wasn't going as well as the BOD/Exc. Comm. wanted. They keep saying we could get a lot more for that stuff at convention. There was a big "tado" over a set of Betty Hirschmann's kite pins and the e-bay auction was stopped. The bottom line was the AKA wanted more money for items that were donated for that purpose. I still have that fighter kite box and I plan on asking each of the folks that made a donation how they want me to handle it. You see folks it's all about the bucks $$$.

That's three proposals in two years time. Looking back I find less than five RD's as long as I have been on the BOD to make any proposals over the last two year period. The proposals I have seen are generated by the executive committee and the president and just about 99% of them get passed with ease.

Is being a good RD all about making proposals ?? Is being a good RD all about membership numbers ?? Is being a good RD about being popular with the board ?? Or is being a good RD about supporting and representing one's region members and promoting kiting ???

Sincerely

Woody Woods

To: ConnectiKITERS

From: "deepwoods1965"

Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 12:23:30 -0000

Subject: [connectikiters] Re: Reconsider Woody Region 1 Director Removal "Proposals"

I do agree that we elected you to represent the members, not the

BOD.

lets fly free; Dave Olsen.

--- In connectikiters WOODY. .. wrote:
>This is in response to Barbara Meyer's e-mail about my proposals.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: A message from the AKA for Region 1

Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 09:35:09 -0800

From: Your AKA President

Reply-To: AKA President

Organization: The American Kitefliers Association

To: Maggie Engvall

This email is in response to the recent posting by AKA Region 1 Director Robert "Woody" Woods to several kite forums. Many of you understandably want more information and want to know that your Association is being managed responsibly.

First let me clarify that Mr Woods is still the Region 1 Director and a member of the AKA Board of Directors. A vote has not been taken to remove Mr Woods, however a special BOD meeting has been called.

Mr Woods is not just a member of the Association; he is an official representative of the AKA. All members of the Board of Directors have a responsibility to act in the best interest of the Association.

In his proposed column for Kiting, Mr Woods reports that membership is "going down the tubes" and implied that renewing isn't important. Statements such as this do not support the AKA's goal to maintain and grow membership. While overall decline in the Association for 2006 was less than 10%, Region 1 during this time accounted for 46% of the total membership decline. The proposed report does not help stabilize this critical AKA region.

The AKA Executive Committee discussed the implications of these statements in conjunction with other relevant issues, which have been raised in the past, and unanimously recommended to the Board to consider removal. The Board of Directors reviewed the issues and voted to give Mr Woods 30 days notice of the intent to pursue his removal in accordance with the AKA Bylaws for actions "not in the best interest of the Association".

The decision to call for a vote on February 20th was not taken lightly, nor was it a reaction to a single incident regarding the potentially damaging Region 1 report. There have been past actions and statements during Mr Woods' 2 years on the board considered as possibly detrimental to the AKA that have led the Board to the point of considering removing Mr. Woods. A determination on whether these actions are harmful to the Association has not yet been made. The Board understands a full accounting of these actions is desired by many. Confidentiality of executive session makes it inappropriate to share non-public information. If the board acting in what they believe to be the best interest of the Association makes the determination that these actions are prejudicial to the best interest of the AKA, the membership will be provided with an update.

Kite flying is supposed to be fun. It is sad when negativity detracts from our primary goals. But it is also necessary for your Board to manage your Association with professionalism and integrity. Our bylaws call on the Board to remove Directors who act contrary to your best interests. Therefore, the Board is now considering this difficult and uncomfortable question.

If you have opinions on this topic, please feel free to contact any member of the Board of Directors. The final decision is scheduled for February 20.

Regards,

Susan Skinner

President, American Kitefliers Association

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [NEKITE] Re: A message from the AKA for Region 1

Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:18:19 -0500

From: Marty Sasaki

Reply-To: <[NEKITE]>

To: AKA President <president@aka.kite.org>

CC: [NEKITE]

Thank you for your thorough reply to my questions. I am forwarding your note to the nekite mailing list. This action has stirred things up quite a bit, and I believe that the kite community should know what is going on with the AKA. I realize that such actions are not taken lightly, but am alarmed that such actions are being taken.

Marty Sasaki

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] Fw: A message from the AKA for Region 1

Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 22:43:43 -0500

From: Gary Quinton

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE], <CTKiters@yahoogroups.com>, "New York Kite Enthusiasts" , <LHSO14B>

CC: Glenn Davison

Susan,

Thank you for your explanation of the process leading to a call to meeting concerning Woody. I can not speak to those "other relevant issues", but as far as Woody's statements concerning membership, He stated . AKA Membership is going down the tubes and with the increase in dues; that I did not vote in favor of, I'm sure the numbers will be bleak to say the least. I've said it before and I'll say it again if you want to pay your dues please do and if not that's up to you I promise I won't bug you. I'll leave that up to your next regional director. This, to me, is the first time I have ever heard Woody speak disparagingly about the benefits of AKA membership. In my presence Woody has been quite vocal about joining AKA, and has expressed his dismay when people opt not to join. His statement seems to indicate that people will get out of AKA only what they put into it. Obviously he disagrees with the decision to raise membership rates. So do I. in way of disclosure you should know I brought it up at the 2005 National convention business meeting, suggesting an alternative to the current membership fee structure.

You state that all BOD members "have a responsibility to act in the best interest of the association". If a BOD member believes that increased fees will harm the organization isn't it his/her duty to speak up? If dissent is considered disruptive and detrimental then any member of the BOD that does not toe the party line could consider himself at risk of dismissal. This sounds more like a monarchy than an Association.

Woody entered his position with enthusiasm. Unfortunately the reality of AKA politics seems to have worn him down. A shame really because The AKA needs more Woodys.

Thank you for your time.

Gary Quinton

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [NYKE] sent to BOD AKA from my AKA official address - not NYKE valid

Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 17:56:39 -0500

From: Paul Peters

Reply-To: [NYKE]

To: [NYKE]

Yes, I am sure that Woody has a history of making himself heard over the past years of his tenure. That was why we voted for him. We voted for him so that our voices would be heard. I am now sure that Woody’s manner of speaking did indeed catch your attention and make you listen to what he was saying for us.

I realize that any time you get more than one person involved with something, you will have differences of opinions. Some will be pretty. Some will not. The AKA has been lambasted by fliers all across the country for years and years. We, including Woody, have for many of those years defended the organization. Now let me tell you; that can be a very significant difference in opinion. Now the organization is reverting to its clichéd image of old. Decrying how sad that it has to sacrifice this one of it’s own who had contributed so much in the past, and now was no longer a loyal representative. Yes, how very sad. How pathetic…the AKA.

But, I still hope that I can defend it, if this can be successfully resolved.

If not…

Know full well that if Woody is removed before his final few months of office, there will indeed be another decrease in membership as determined by the BOD.

Paul Peters

currently AKA member 11****

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [NEKITE] Regional Director

Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 19:04:44 -0500

From: Tony H

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE]

I thought I would add my two cents worth to this discussion in case
people think I just don't care.

I hope the AKA board are getting the message, we knew who Woody was
before we voted for him and that is why we voted for him. I don't think
anyone expected or wanted Woody to change his "tell things as they
really" are attitude.

I have been seriously thinking about ending my AKA membership for a
number of years (actually since I went to my first and only convention)
and Woody has been one of the reasons I stayed. Unless you are a stunt
kite competitor or serious kite builder or a serious convention fan I
don't see a compelling reason to stay. Much of what people do in our
area to promote kiting are pretty much independent of AKA. With the
increase in dues, AKA is going to see lots of people like me end their
affiliation.

Tony H

To: "Susan Skinner"

CC: "Woody Woods" "ConnectiKITERS" <ConnectiKITERS>, "CTkiters" <CTKiters@yahoogroups.com>, "LHSO14B" <LHSO14B>, "NEKITE" <NEKITE>, "NYKE" <NYKE>

From: "Doug Coates"

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:09:26 -0800 (PST)

Subject: [connectikiters] Region Onr Director

Susan,

For what it is worth, here are my two cents. I voted for Woody to be Region One Director. It is still my desire, for Woody to complete his term. It will not make me or anyone I know happy if you terminate him. I will also state that it is the voice of Region One members who shall represent us. Certainly, not the Executive Board.

At times, I don't always agree with Woody's methods but I know in my heart that he started out being Director of Region One with good intentions. He was excited, enthused and full of new ideas. You can censure him if you want, but I don't believe you can dismiss him that easy. Remember that kiting is supposed to be fun!

Cordially,

Doug Coates

Formerly "The Dot" Team Ginsu

AKA 11****

To: ConnectiKITERS

From: DAVE OLSEN

Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 12:38:37 -0000

Subject: [connectikiters] Re: Removal of region one director

--- In ConnectiKITERS, Maggie Engvall wrote:
>
> I go along with several people's statements:
>
>
I also agree that this seems like something personal that should be
taken care of in person rather than in this manour. I also voted for
Woody for the reason that he got the ax. He believes it is important
for the small guys like me to be heard from and stood up for. And he
does not back down. I'm sorry that this happened in this way and I am
also Writing to the Prez. to voice my oppinions. I wonder if I will
get kicked out as well.

Thanks for letting me vent.

Dave Olsen.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] The plot thickens...

Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:54:45 -0500

From: Joe. T.

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE]

WOW i have never seen soooooooo many emails in mylife about kiting. As people do i imagine these discusions are trickling out to every day life. Hmmmmmmmmmm as they say, no publicity is bad publicity. The passion and out puring of emotion over all this is amazing . The board may not like Woddy but alot of us in region one love him. He says whats on his mind and he has brought about a lot of passion here. To Susan, I don't see where u can come out ahead gettinng rid of him. Just my humble opinion and obervations . Sincerly Joseph Tricarico

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [LHSO14B] More imformation on the RD removal matter

Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 08:30:37 -0800 (PST)

From: carlosst

Reply-To: [LHSO14B]

To: [LHSO14B]

This is Todd Little's answer to a request from John Carey

John
Thanks again for writing.

Let me tell you that I have exposed myself to many different types of people and
situations throughout my life. As a nurse, I have worked in mental hospitals,
drug rehabs, and I currently work in state prisons. I have heard, and used,
nasty language myself on occasion. However, I am surprised that you might think
that all, most, or even many, members of Region 1 might feel that Woody speaks
for them when he does so in such an unprofessional manner, no matter what
opinion he is espousing.

Woody serves on the Board of Directors of a national (international)
organization. He represents hundreds of dues paying members. Those members have
the right to expect that he comport himself professionally and with dignity.

I understand that we're all just kite fliers. Just a bunch of people who like to
go around and toss our kites in the air. But the Association is one that, among
its many duties, manages over $100,000 in assets, publishes it's own magazine,
and deals with the insurance of hundreds of events all over the country. Not a
small task, nor one to be taken lightly.

Unfortunately, the bylaws and Roberts Rules of Order, under which we members
chose to use to operate by a vote of the membership, do not allow full
disclosure of all of the matters that are involved.

I certainly didn't choose to have this situation occur, but now that it has,
I will do my best to act in the manner which I believe will serve the Association
best. I thank you for your belief that the board will be acting in the best
interest of Region 1 and the rest of the Association.

Todd

To: ConnectiKITERS, [NEKITE], NYKE, LHSO14B, CTKiters@yahoogroups.com

From: Sue Moskowitz

Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 21:47:10 EST

Subject: [connectikiters] Region 1 Director Removal

TO: President/Board of Directors AKA

RE: Region I Director's Removal

Sue Moskowitz writes:

I have a few questions and comments regarding the letter from the president and events of the past 3 days in Region 1.

Thank you in advance for your time.

Susan Skinner writes: Mr Woods is not just a member of the Association; he is an official representative of the AKA. All members of the Board of Directors have a responsibility to act in the best interest of the Association. It seems that a large number of the membership, here in Region 1, are very satisfied with Mr. Woods' representation according to 99.9% of the emails that have been posted to the groups in the last 3 days. They believe he is acting with the association's best interest. Because he does not agree with the board he does not want the best for the AKA? So the board has never made a bad decision. Hmmmmmmm....membership goes up when we cover the kite boarding community, 2 claims are filed, then we loose individual insurance coverage for the recreational/ competitive flyer....not such a good decision in my opinion.

In his proposed column for Kiting, Mr Woods reports that membership is "going down the tubes" and implied that renewing isn't important. Implied in your interpretation of what was written. He stated he wasn't going to chase people for their renewals. Everyone is aware of when their membership is due and an email from the director is not going to prompt them to renew if they don't want to. Does not the AKA send a notice in the mail when their membership has lapsed?

Statements such as this do not support the AKA's goal to maintain and grow membership. While overall decline in the Association for 2006 was less than 10%, Region 1 during this time accounted for 46% of the total membership decline. Has the board taken into consideration that the 2 largest kite retailers in the North East have closed their businesses in the last year? Check you records and see how many new members and how many events these 2 companies were responsible for in past years. Mr. Woods was not responsible for that. Also has anyone thought about the membership decline versus the timing of the loss of individual member insurance coverage? No matter what anyone tells me the reason most people joined the AKA through my shop or my events was by reading they were covered through the AKA insurance, whether the understood what that meant or not, they felt it was a major benefit for joining the organization. 13+ years of being in business in 2 locations made me aware of many members' opinions in our region. The proposed report does not help stabilize this critical AKA region.

The decision to call for a vote on February 20th was not taken lightly, nor was it a reaction to a single incident regarding the potentially damaging Region 1 report. I believe this action by the board has already caused much more damage to the AKA in Region 1 than anything Mr. Woods had stated in his report. Whether you vote to keep him or have him removed major damage control will be needed. There have been past actions and statements during Mr Woods' 2 years on the board considered as possibly detrimental to the AKA that have led the Board to the point of considering removing Mr. Woods. Has anyone thought that maybe Mr. Woods is repeating the thoughts and opinions of the body of his members, that maybe it is more than just his opinion? Mr. Woods has conducted meetings, during our events on occasion, asking the membership for their input. A determination on whether these actions are harmful to the Association has not yet been made. The Board understands a full accounting of these actions is desired by many. Confidentiality of executive session makes it inappropriate to share non-public information. If the board acting in what they believe to be the best interest of the Association makes the determination that these actions are prejudicial to the best interest of the AKA, the membership will be provided with an update.

Kite flying is supposed to be fun. It is sad when negativity detracts from our primary goals. Agreed 100% and I can assure you that all of the folks here in the North East will continue to fly kites, have events, and spread the word of kiting with or without being a member of the AKA. But it is also necessary for your Board to manage your Association with professionalism and integrity. Our bylaws call on the Board to remove Directors who act contrary to your best interests. Therefore, the Board is now considering this difficult and uncomfortable question.

In closing I would like to say how displeased I am with this whole situation. First, everyone is entitled to his opinion. Dialogue and debate are healthy, but personal vendettas are childish and unwarranted. This is supposed to be an organization for the kite flyer of all levels of interest. More and more I am hearing from the average flyer on our fields that they feel there is an upper echelon, that "clique" as they call it, and then there is the rest of us.

After being involved in organized kiting for over 20 years, ironically finding out about the AKA at the convention in Newport RI in 1986, running the business and one of the largest events on the East Coast, I feel that if Mr. Woods is removed by the board I want my membership canceled immediately.

Sincerely,

Susan Moskowitz

President, High Flyers Inc.

To: AKA Board, nekite, ConnectiKITERS

From: WOODY

Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 23:24:48 EST

Subject: [connectikiters] Responce to S. Skinners e-mail to my region

Hello again everyone, This letter is in response to Sue Skinners e-mail message to Region one. Let me start off by saying it sure took her long enough to get back to you. Second having read it I'm willing to bet my last fighter kite the reason for the delay was she had help in writing it. I have read enough letters from Dave Gomberg to tell he had his hand in this letter for sure. If I'm wrong I apologize but I doubt it.

Sue Skinner's comment say I implied renewing your membership isn't important. Implied meaning "twisting" my words around again to make me look bad.

What I said was this AKA Membership is going down the tubes and with the increase in dues; that I did not vote in favor of, I'm sure the numbers will be bleak to say the least. I've said it before and I'll say it again if you want to pay your dues please do and if not that's up to you I promise I won't bug you. I never said it wasn't important to pay your dues.

Let me talk about membership numbers. Even better let's talk about the numbers in region One. Back when I was new to the AKA at the Treasure Island convention in 2000 membership was really low Dave Gomberg just took over again as president and he had a big push for membership, At the time Steve Santos was our RD and he did a knock out job signing up members as did all the RD's during the years 2000 and 2002. From 2002 until now we have been on a steady decline from 503 members in 2002 to 304 as of right now.

Region 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002

1 304 381 417 465 503

I have said and have been saying the last two years is we have a lot of what I call false members or members who joined for one reason or another but not really hard core AKA kiters like we are. I know we set up AKA booths at the Newport festival and talked people into joining for the insurance alone. Our local kite shop High Flyers Flight Company which was run by Sue Moskowitz signed up 173 members all by herself over the years. All Sue had to do was sell a person a cheap stunt kite and with a big smile she had them signed up for an AKA membership and insurance. < ---- Big kicker Not only did we loose Sue's kite shop we lost two other smaller one's in my region.

Now let's talk about 2005 when I was the top RD in the AKA for signing up members I myself signed up 17 brand new members. No other RD even came close to that. Yes I had a gimmick and it was working great .Members of the BOB didn't care for my method but it was working for membership. As most of you know I gave all brand new members ten dollars off their first year membership. I said I was going to do it for ten members so it cost me one hundred dollars out of my pocket. The problem was I still had new people chasing me around for more discounted memberships. So I went to the AKA and asked for my RD stipend of one hundred dollars. It's in the by laws that each RD can take one hundred dollars per year for expenses. Mel sent me a check for one hundred dollars with a big stink from Al Sparling. Right after that Dave Gomberg and his executive committee went into executive session and put a stop to RD's taking their stipend. The power of the executive branch really controls all. Anyway they sent me the hundred bucks because they had to and I picked up seven more new members for a total of seventeen for the year. Believe me when I tell you I took a lot of flack for taking the hundred bucks but as of today I'm glad I did I made seventeen new members very happy. Look at the chart below and see how the membership in the other Regions are going. Myself I only want members in my region who want to be members, not for insurance, not for the magazine, not for the 10% off at the kite shop. I want my members to be members because they love kites and the people who build them and fly them. No false members, no false promises, just members who love kites like I do.

Region 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002

1 304 381 417 465 503

2 357 381 411 441 442

3 256 248 226 255 256

4 320 353 441 541 523

5 282 291 329 342 321

6 374 370 364 394 371

7 224 232 249 273 272

8 300 308 317 364 363

9 188 174 181 184 167

10 443 453 465 447 447

11 271 297 285 315 307

12 237 250 252 286 306

13 258 242 249 235 223

TOTAL 3814 3980 4186 4542 4501

In closing let me say there has been much discussion about the BOD removing me from my elected position as RD. I think by now everyone knows it's a thankless position but I take it seriously. The BOD did ask me, prior to the vote on Jan. 17th, if I would voluntarily resign from my position. Wouldn't that be easier for them and the AKA membership would never know what really is happening. You all know I don't do things the easy way. If I go down - I'll go down swinging. I appreciate the outpouring of emails sent to me and to the AKA on my behalf from AKA members and kite flyers from around the world. No matter how this ends I will not be silenced, I will continue to fly kites and I will remain in contact with my many true kite friends. Thank you for your support.

Woody Woods

To: ConnectiKITERS

From: "gretchen"

Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:59:24 -0500

Subject: Re: [connectikiters] Region 1 Director Removal

Ah, politics.. If there was a want to engage in exclusionary politics, it seems the Board should pursue proper political jobs.. Lacking that boldness, apparently, they are left to quiet - or attempt to - the squeaking wheel.

Perhaps a small review of history would be in order.. They might start with the Revolution.. Or any of the many people, events or thoughts that began in the Northeast that led to sweeping change.. One might assume that in 2007, a call for intelligent, communicative leadership with justifiable actions is a reasonable expectation.. That it might widely recognized that the East Coast might be ahead of some of the rest of the country, what with some of the world's major seats of power and money.. Or how some organizations turn great ideas into rallying factors.. I'd be happy to loan them some copies of Seth Godin, Malcolm Gladwell or Freakonomics.

A consideration of membership decline and perceived membership value might be a better Board focus.. Another could be that alienating a strong, passionate community because of their interest and investment in the organization (esp as other interest wanes) would be "not in the best interest of the AKA".. Perhaps some insightful Board member might even realize the error of causing such a group to rally behind a leader they are ostracizing, and how that might lead to an alternate group's formation, which would not only draining the resources of the AKA but be seen as a negative reflection that the leadership can't just grow up and share their toys.

That's just my 2.¢, but then I believe in the power of process and unity over giving war a chance to work.. And I'm only a hobby kite flyer, in it for the simple joy it brings me and others.

Best regards,

Gretchen

p.s. Woody, should you decide to form a new group, kindly include me in the invite.. I like your style and would be willing to hear what you've got in mind.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] Region 1 Director Removal

Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 18:47:05 -0500

From: Jan Helbers

Reply-To: [NEKITE]

To: [NEKITE] , [ConnectiKITERS]

Right on the mark Gretchen !

New Englanders never did submit easily to taxation without representation !

Perhaps a few hundred copies of AKA magazine thrown into Boston Harbor ?

If the AKA board does remove Woody on Feb 20th then I will be raising the
issue at KONE's March meeting as to whether there is a necessity for K.O.N.E.s
continued direct association with the AKA. I believe that, like most of the members
of ConnectiKiters, at least 75% to 80% ( and perhaps as high as 90%) of K.O.N.E.
dues paying members do not fly in competitions or spend the time and money to
attend the AKA conventions.

We might well consider if our time and money would be better spent trying to
raise our regional clubs memberships to attract more "weekend flyers". These
will be the source of the next generation of life-long kite enthusiast.

Jan & Cathy Helbers

To: ConnectiKITERS

From: "Barbara Meyer"

Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 08:48:55 -0600

Subject: [connectikiters] FW: Reconsider Woody Region 1 Director Removal "Proposals"

First of all, let me say how nice it is to have a non-hostile discussion, with a teen age daughter I get enough of that from her.. I’d be the first to admit that the AKA and it’s BOD are not perfect. We struggle to choose, and sincerely try to make the best choices from what is available.

Some have questioned why BOD mail is confidential. Again, it is because when each of us came onto the board, we agreed to keep it that way. Now, legally, if the author of a post chooses to make it public, that is their right.

The AKA president cannot make motions, and at regular bod meetings do not vote.

Others asked, what difference does it make what proposals were made to the board? Quite frankly it’s because the board needs choices. If Region 1 and it’s director don’t like the direction the AKA has been/is going show us a different route. Just say no didn’t work in the war on drugs, and it doesn’t work here. It is easy to complain about board actions, but harder to come up with other ideas. The suggestion here is be part of the solution.

Woody writes: This is in response to Barbara Meyer's e-mail about my proposals.

Hold it, I didn’t twist that, or say it. I simply responded to the email.

I'm sure everyone is clear that I have been given a 30 day written notice that the BOD may remove me on Feb 20th. That being said let's talk about Woody's proposals over the last few years.

The AKA does not have employees, it has contractors. In employment law there is a huge difference. Each contractor submits a bid for what they are will to work for. Mel did not bid for a raise, and until he asks for it, the board cannot give it to him.. Every contractor is evaluated yearly using the same form and they all ask how much contact do you have with the contractor. Not a cover up, just a standard form. $2000 doesn’t sound like a lot of money, but it is the dues of 70 people. Region 1 lost 77 last year. Last year the AKA was almost $10,000 in the hole, should we spend another $2000 and go in deeper?

Again, the convention manager is a contractor and bids for the position. When this bid was received, the conventions for the previous years had been profitable and growing. Her evaluation form also asks, how much contact do you have with this contractor.

Convention is a tough issue. The AKA policy calls for us to rotate thru areas of the country to give a chance for everyone to once in a while have a location close to them. Most conventions need hotel rooms, meeting space, and exhibit space. The AKA needs all that and flying fields, and to be affordable to our members. Quite frankly, it is very difficult to pull all those together. The AKA depends on members to suggest locations, and on localities to send in bids. The convention chair and manager contact these areas and urge them to submit proposals.. Even though I live in the Midwest, I’m the first to admit there are no wide beaches, no tropical breezes, no guarantees of fabulous weather. Now, for 2006 we were due to visit the central area of the country, regions 5-8. The board had 2 good, not sexy but good, proposals. Des Moines and Milwaukee. They were pretty similar. Milwaukee was for a downtown location, with hotel rooms at $105 a night plus $15 a day parking. The closest budget hotel was in the suburbs a good 40 minute drive in non rush hour. Des Moines was a more suburban location with hotel rooms at $75 a night, no parking fee and the closest budget hotel 1 block away. Which would you choose? The board had no other option to look at. Sure you can tell the convention chair and manager you don’t like those cities, but where is your location?

Now, we keep hearing what a bad decision the board made to go there. How do you define success? Was attendance lower? Yes. However, the auction raised $3000 more than in Ocean City the year before, and the overall convention actually made money. The convention in Ocean City lost a lot of money and was the main reason the AKA was in the hole $10,000 last year. Thanks to a very successful convention, we start out this year in better financial shape.

This was a fabulous suggestion and the bod went with it right away. Woody suggested a fighter kite box , again great idea. Other directors came up with items to kick it off while Woody put the box together. That was 2 years ago. How many of you looked at the AKA items? How many of you bid on the AKA items? Anybody buy one? Well, you were the exception. Those items went for next to nothing. Meanwhile, Woody is still putting the fighter kite box together. As late as July, Gomberg was still asking him when it would be ready. Glad to hear it finally is. The pin set? What to do? Previous items went for very low dollar on eBay. Historically pin sets go for top dollar at convention. Do we take another chance on eBay with a very special item, or do we fall back on what has worked before? What would you do?

Membership is touchy because so many things influence the numbers, not just what an RD does. It is about bringing proposals when you don’t like what is going on. Give the board something different to choose from, not just NO. You don’t have to be popular with the board, but it would be nice to continue non-hostile discussions. Sure it’s fun to get a rise out of someone, but what does that really accomplish? A great story to tell on the kite field, wasted time on the board. True changes? No Upset people? Yes The best way to guarantee that the AKA continues the way it has been going is to tie up the board responding to those comments. Is that what you really want?

My hope this year was that the board would finally become pro-active, looking for ways to improve the AKA, and yes, maybe even take it down a different path. To do that we first need to acknowledge that Woody is stubborn, Susan is just as stubborn,(I think they’ve surprised each other) Region 1 and all regions have some valid complaints. We also need to find a better way to address those complaints, not just rock the boat. It’s called working together.

You don’t like where convention is being held? How about volunteering to scout out sites? Convention sites for 2008 are being looked at right now. Talk to your director about where those sites are, you don’t like them, now is the time to find something else. In 2009, we’ll be back in regions 5-8. Look at the map, where would you like to go? Contact the visitors bureau in that area and tell them to contact the AKA. The last president email had a convention questionnaire. Send your comments to Mike Shaw the new convention chair. That committee is being pro-active in looking at ways to improve convention.

You don’t like the pictures in the magazine or the articles? Send in some of yours, or at least send the editor some suggestions. Not vague comments that I don’t like it, something real, like we need more history, or an article on fighter kite battle technique and suggest someone that could write it. Nothing is going on in your region during the winter? What about workshops that are coming up? What about a feature on a local club? Maybe turn the column over to a local club, that would feature some new names

Is it possible to find something good out of this mess? Is there a resolution possible? The AKA is a member driven organization, and it is up to each of us to do our part. Again, it is really easy to say no, it is really easy to complain, it is really-really easy to get a rise out of some board members, but do any of those things effect change in the AKA? No. The only way the AKA is going to change is by choosing some specific issues to work on and tackling them one by one. That’s going to call for a willingness in each board member to throw out all sorts of suggestions, even if they do seem wild and crazy. Personally I’m still hoping we can do that.

Susan asked that the board think about the goals we would like to accomplish this year. Just call me a sucker, but I’m was willing to stick my neck out with a list of about 15 items. Sad to say, that discussion has gone no where. What are the goals of Region 1?

Barbara Meyer

To: "Tim and Sue Boyle"

From: "Barbara Meyer"

Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 10:18:19 -0600

Subject: [connectikiters] RE: Region One Director removal

It has long been AKA policy to rotate the convention sites across the US. For those of us in the Midwest, that means every year we fly to Baltimore and drive hours to Ocean City, or Portland, or Seattle, or even Dayton. Des Moines may not be in your top ten of places to visit, but those of us that went had a fabulous time. And, for the AKA it was a resounding success. Not just because a good time was had, but because the auction brought in $3000 more than the 2005 auction in Ocean City. Overall the convention made a profit unlike Ocean City that lost a lot of money.

Looking to 2007, the board had 4 proposals to choose from. Now, the AKA doesn’t have money or volunteers to send people out. We have to depend on local clubs and city organizations to submit a proposal to us. In addition we have a very demanding list of needs, nobody else needs outdoor flying fields. Ocean Shores, Seaside, Billings and Albuquerque submitted proposals. By a large margin Ocean Shores had the best proposal. If you had strong feeling about the location of the convention, your RD should have passed those on to the board. I’ll copy the meeting minutes below and you can find the entire set of minutes at the AKA site.

A. Convention Site Selection - Susan Skinner

Susan asked if there were questions regarding the convention selection for 2007. Motion by Susan to select Ocean Shores convention proposal for 2007.

Question was asked regarding the distance from the airport to convention location to see if there is a need to rent a car. The distance was believed to be approximately 2 ½ to 3 hours from SeaTac airport in Seattle, or approximately 3 hours from Portland. There was a question about the cost of other expense items for Ocean Shores, compared to other convention locations, i.e., dinners not covered by convention and hotel costs. It was stated that there is enough variety to give the membership plenty of reasonable options. Hotels rates for the area are listed at $60 - $90. There was another question concerning the distance between the hotel, beach, and convention center in Ocean Shores. David stated that each location is a little spread apart however, the convention center is approximately one block from the convention hotel, and vehicle parking is allowed on the beach, which is a big benefit in Ocean Shores.

The were no further questions or comments. Motion to select Ocean Shores for 2007 convention 2nd by Marla.

Motion carried.

The decision for the location of 2008 convention will be made in April. I urge you to contact your RD and find out the proposed lactations and pass on any comments prior to the board vote

Speaking of workshops, having been coordinator, I know how difficult it is to find presenters. If you have any suggestions as to what you would like, even if you don’t plan to attend convention, contact the workshop coordinator, Deb Lenzen and offer suggestions. The chair is always looking for something different. Counts are taken of attendance at each and used to help plan the following years offerings.

You speak of not being able to take criticism. Unrelenting negativity is not criticism and not conducive to change. How many insults do people have to put up with? If your region truly wants change, the board needs to hear some alternatives. Just yelling NO to everyone else’s suggestions won’t make something better appear.

The board too is not happy with the status quo and is looking for other options.

Susan asked the board to do some brainstorming to think about the goals we would like to work on for 2007. Willing to stick my neck out I listed about 15 items on my fantasy list. The RD for your region did not respond. We don’t know what region 1 wants!! What are the goals of Region 1 and it’s director? Simply to push buttons and rock the boat? To have great stories for the kite field about getting other directors worked up?

So, you’re unhappy with the AKA, what are the top 5 things on your list that you would like to see changed? I’d like to promise the board will work on those. For that, we need an atmosphere on the board where people can offer ideas without worrying about getting zapped by your RD.

Barbara Meyer, vp1

. -----Original Message-----

From: Tim and Sue

We’ve been AKA members for about 12 years and we’ve been unhappy with the organization for the last 4 or 5 of those years. This latest fiasco of AKA “firing” one of its ELECTED directors has just pushed us over the edge.

Attempting to oust Woody is a slap in the face to the entire Region and the sport in general. If the current action against Woody and Region One continues, we will not be renewing our membership. We have no issue with the dues increase but AKA’s recent actions have made us painfully aware that the organization is bogged down with politics and personal agendas.

Long before Woody was Region One director, lots of people in Region One were unhappy with AKA. Despite what he might have said in AKA meetings, Woody has always been a strong advocate of the AKA in the Region.

You say there has been a 46% decline in Region One memberships recently, but it’s not just the AKA. There has been an overall decline in interest in kiting in the entire Region – something that concerns us greatly. Three local kite shops (Northern Sky Toyz, Something in the Air, and High Flyers Flight Company) have all closed within the last year or so. All these shops carried AKA membership forms and promoted the organization to their customers. As far as retaining current members: what do we get for our membership dues? Besides insurance, not much. These are financially difficult times and people are looking for more value for their money.

If you think Woody is influencing people to not renew their AKA memberships, I think you're giving him too much credit. One thing I’ve heard is that Woody has been accused of encouraging people to boycott last year’s Convention in Des Moines . This is a blatantly ridiculous notion – to think that one person has that much influence in this Region. Nobody does. Most of us are damn stubborn, independent Yankees (not the baseball team) who don’t like being told what to do.

Most of us didn’t go to Convention in Des Moines because, frankly, the location sucked and AKA ignored all attempts to discuss the matter. And AKA is doing it again for 2007. Ocean Shores is a terrible location for Convention. We’ve been there before and have no desire to return. It’s too far from the Airport and there is absolutely nothing else to do in the area (plus the weather is miserable at that time of the year). If I’m going to use up vacation time, pay an arm and a leg to register for Convention, then fly across the country and drive for 3 hours to get to a crappy hotel, there has to be more to do at that location than the same workshops AKA offers every year.

Yes, Woody is outspoken and sometimes abrasive, but he honestly represents what Region One members are saying, and he is doing his job to get our voice heard. And words are just that – words. The actions you’ve taken are more harmful to the AKA than anything anyone could ever have said. What, AKA can’t take any sort of criticism? Criticism is how changes get made for the better, and AKA is sorely in need of that.

You say you are trying to conduct the business of the AKA in a responsible and professional manner. However, AKA is known for its lack of communication and seldom, if ever, offers accountability for its actions. Confidentiality (and Roberts Rules of Order) aside, we want to know what’s behind decisions and we want our opinions heard and acknowledged. Obviously with a 46% decline in membership the status quo isn’t working anymore.

Tim and Sue Boyle

To: ConnectiKITERS

From: "Barbara Meyer"

Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 16:54:55 -0600

Subject: [connectikiters] FW: Continuing Comments- RD1 Removal

Jim Carey writes: Thanks, Barbara, for taking the time to respond. I guess I would question why everything discussed by the board should be held confidential. Now, I can see certain personnel actions, pay issues, personal matters discussed and the like to be held in confidence, but why on earth would you want to hold everything to be confidential, unless you didn't want the membership to know what was going on? That would be contrary to the very purpose of the board, in my opinion. The board should be taking furthering the exercise of kite flying and that is the same interest of the general membership, in my opinion. Had no idea an agreement not to disclose was required for the board members. Seems rather peculiar a requirement. Was there a historical incident that made adopting the rule necessary?

The agreement is not to discuss with members what the board is talking about, we all do that. It is an agreement not to pass on board emails. Usually the discussions start with â€œWhat is the worst that could happen, what have we done in the past. There is a lot of personal issues discussed, and a lot of hard choices made. Directors try out a lot of ideas in brainstorming. We try to come to a consensus, but can't please everyone.

Frankly, I have always felt that Dave Gomberg, as president of AKA had a bit of conflict of interest, insofar as he has a kite sales business, which might influence him to steer in a particular way that might not be in the club best interest. If that were me, I would step out of any vote on issues that reflected a potential conflict of interest. Not meaning to judge, and maybe he has actually done that, as warranted. Just thinking about this aspect as a possible reason I, as a board member, might not want the membership to know what was going on.

The president doesn't get a vote. Gomberg was willing to step up and be president when no one else was. For 6 years no one ran against him. This year 2 people stepped up because he refused to do it again.

Another concern to me is why Susan did not mention this decision to seek a removal vote for Woody. She has been posting messages to the membership and another followup one to the Region 1 members. Seems to me, she should have mentioned this to the Region 1 membership. I expect she would have said nothing, had Woody not informed everyone, until it was a done deal. I don't think that is very fair to the members.

They deserve to know about the RD they elected. Gives us the opportunity to try to correct any errors of judgment, request him to stop saying things we do not want him to go on about, and to cast about for a replacement person, if he is indeed removed.

This whole issue does point out that an RD can be saying/doing one thing on the board and telling the region something else. Maybe the whole system of RD reports need to be changed so each RD makes a quarterly report to the board which then becomes part of the meeting minutes and open to all

And, speaking of a replacement, how does that work? Would a special election be held? Would a temporary appointment be made by the board? Would it be filled until the next general election? I sure hope we get to vote on any replacement, if it comes to that.

A replacement would be appointed to serve until the next election. The election would be held this summer/fall and the elected rep would take over after convention.

Also, I understand that regions are intended to be approximately equal in size of members. If ours has really dropped 46 percent membership in 2006, would our territories be changed? If so, when would that happen? Also, would regions be reduced in number, if a general membership decline occurs?

We've looked a changing regions. No one was happy with the suggestions. Where the Membership lives has changed since the last time regions were re-drawn.. Our by-laws call for 12 US regions and 1 to cover the rest of the world. If you think the east coast directors have a lot of territory to cover, look at regions 7 & 8. If the board can find a brave person to chair that committee, we'll take another look at it this year. Then the board would review. Care to volunteer?

I re-read the message Woody sent out and he definitely says he has been thrown out already and the 2/20 meeting is just to formalize that decision. If the majority of board members already agreed to remove him, seems we are just talking semantics here.

Hmmm, that's interesting. No, the vote was to hold the meeting. The 30 days is to hold discussions and let the directors make up their minds.

I think series of e-mails is a deplorable way to handle an action of this kind. I think the bylaws need to be changed. In today's age, certainly video conferencing is highly do-able. Board members could each go to local television studios, which all offer a live uptake link.

What we have is really a trial of an officer for an alleged malfeasance. How many judges would allow e-mail trying of a legal case? The immediacy of give and take and spontaneous follow through of the questioning and polling are very important to the outcome. Would you feel comfortable with such an approach, if you were the one in the hotseat? I would not.

The by-laws do allow conferencing other than in a face to face meeting. We do it by telephone. Items can be discussed via email but no vote can be taken by the board via email. Sometimes the prez asks for advise via email and the directors then send it in via email, but no formal vote.

Sure, video conferencing is doable. Right now we pay about $7 a minute for phone conferences. The quarterly board meeting typically last 2 hours. How much would video conferencing cost?

If it were me, I'd welcome a time to state my case to the board.

I do not feel the dues are the equivalent of a tax. I was just using a poor analogy. Speaking of poor analogies, I think your sales staff one is also one. First, Regional Directors are not really salespersons. That may be their duty at times like selling AKA raffle tickets, but it is a small component of their overall tasks.

My point is that the RD is THE representative of the AKA. Just as sales staff promote their companies, the RD promote the AKA.

Next, as far as I know, Woody has not actually suggested that people not pay their membership dues. He has not started anything like a 'do not pay' protest. He just said he was not going to bug them about paying. And, isn't it Woody's job to prepare people and let them know that the dues are going up? That he also tells them that he didn't vote for it doesn't bother me. Unless, the board considers it a confidentiality infringement.

If he wanted to prepare his region, it should have been done in July. I don't know who voted for the raise, it was a voice vote. And it's all in the meeting minutes which are public.

I think way too much importance is being placed on a POTENTIAL Regional Report Woody has prepared. I am sure Woody was under a lot of stress with the holidays and a deadline to write it. I would not put too much credence in one little message. Furthermore, he offered to change it, by inference, in that he asked that it not be changed WITHOUT HIS AWARENESS.

I read all the published Regional Reports and I have to say I have not seen an offensive one written by Woody. Now, I don't know if he or someone else cleaned them up, but, to me, it is always the final product that counts. The board has no way of knowing if Woody might have had second thoughts about what he wrote and changed it, on his own.

When the report goes to the editor, it should be ready for the magazine, except for grammar errors and length. I don't know if he really meant for it to be published, or if he was just "pushing buttons".

We all have moments of negativity or not thinking through what we have written. I think we should all be given the benefit of the doubt in such instances.

Some have more than others. Some send lots of negative messages to the board. That just wastes our time, and distracts the board from actually doing anything. Maybe that's the goal?

Woody has done just that, in his commentary on what Susan wrote to Region 1 members. He said he submitted 3 substantive proposals in his two years on the board and the nature of those. And, he compared his number to the other board members favorably. Now, I have a question for you. Is he violating the board confidentiality by revealing his proposals? You can't hold that against him now, since you authorized such disclosures.

I don't know if you saw my response to his proposal email, it's hard to keep track of who's getting what. I'll forward you a copy instead of repeating everything here.

It is not within my power to authorize disclosure. Every board member can choose whether or not to publicly state what their stand on the issues are. Sure, we ask for and expect confidentiality, but the author of the email. can publish or not as they choose.

Please see my earlier comments. It does seem like this issue with Woody has been brewing for a long time. This is bourne out by your comment that many posts went back and forth. Is it genuinely only this last regional report that has caused the board to act? Instinctively, something in me says that the board has been laying in wait for him for a long time to find a cause to fire him. If this proposed regional report is the best you can do to remove him, I think your group sadly fails to meet the test of proof for genuine actual effect that is prejudicial in its effect on the AKA. In a court of law, this would be viewed as circumstantial at best and disallowed as evidence.

Speaking of court, I hope Woody hires an attorney to help defend and appeal this board decision. You do have an appeals process, do you not? What is it? If none, an appeal to the courts would clearly override your collective decision. Precedent law has set that an organization MUST have an appeals clause. If none, the final decision is made in the courts, with real witnesses, evidence, arguments, and personal appearances. Does the AKA have the money to risk this outcome?

I hope it doesn't get to that point. Woody is not an employee, employment law does not apply.

OK, it looks like you covered the bases in some fashion. I had no idea the decision to increase dues occurred that early. I honestly thought it was a very recent decision.

The $5 increase doesn't bother me. It is insignificant, in perspective. And, for the life of me, I don't know why Woody is so upset about it. If it is as you say, he had the opportunity to present his views. That he didn't prevail is ancient history and he really needs to move on.

Thank you

But, what does bother me is Susan's discussion of the 'harm' done by Woody. She asserted that membership in Region 1 dropped 46 percent in 2006 vice 10 percent for the other regions. Implicit in that was that somehow Woody had caused that membership decline.

Now, this message of Woody's has never hit the press to date. And this was the message that the board is taking him to task over. So, how can it be this message that caused the damage?

Furthermore, as my statistics teacher rightly observed: 'Figures don't lie, but liars can figure'. What that means is statistics can be used to argue any direction and any way with equal effect, depending on the prejudices or intended outcomes of the user.

Region 1 has undergone some reasons for decline in membership. First, was the major warfare among the KONE and clubs. Next, was the loss of High Flyer store and Brenton Point kite kiosk. Accompanied by the elimination of Kitemania, the various indoor fly competitions, Newport Kite Festival, etc.. Plus Steve Santos dropped out as RD, they gave up their suite for kitefliers, no more flyer sponsorships, etc..

Now, Sue Moskowitz created a lot of kite interest to hold kiters in the AKA and to bring new fliers in. If you are going to sling a 46 percent loss number around, you better have analyzed the number. How many were transferred, lost interest because of age, left the area, died, moved into kitesurfing and no need of AKA, and so on? In fairness, I suggest the overall numbers be analyzed to clean up the effect you are seeking.

The RD does influence membership, is it the only thing? No It's good to hear more details about the problems of your region. The membership committee is looking at all the reasons people don't renew. If you have any suggestions, send them to Russ Falk.

A final comment!! If the board does remove Woody, how many members are going to be offended by the action? Have you considered this factor in your decision to remove him? The board was anticipating maximum 10 percent loss due to the price increase. But, what about the negative effect of canning Woody? It might be just the reason for others to consider leaving the fold. Sympathy always goes out to the underdog, regardless of principles involved. And, might I add, Woody is a pretty popular underdog, at that. Are you willing to take that risk over a flimsy case in point?

We don't know how many will leave. My personal hope is that we can find a way out of this. The board has to be able to do the work of the AKA without getting side tracked by someone "pushing buttons" Yea, it's a lot of fun to get a reaction. Do we take up time responding to that, or do we try to focus on improving the organization?.

Barbara Meyer

To: nekite, ConnectiKITERS, Jeremy Johannesen

From: WOODY

Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2007 09:51:11 EST

Subject: [connectikiters] Re: [NEKITE] Support Woody - E-Petition

In a message dated 1/25/2007 9:31:59 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,

Charles Stuart writes:

IMHO it is time for those of us who are good at reading the fine print to see what recourse we as members have, or what action can be taken within the frame work of our by-laws to give us relief from the actions of our broad. Can they be removed?

Section 6. of the AKA bylaws state Any officer of the Association may be removed by a three-fourths (3/4) vote of all votes cast at any duly called regular meeting of the Board of Directors, for activity which in the judgment of the Directors or the members is prejudicial to the best interests of the Association. Written notice of intent to remove an officer must be given thirty (30) days in advance to the officer to be so removed.

Right now there is no bylaw to impeach the president of the AKA by its members, but maybe there should be. The action to remove me from the board was initiated by the President and the Exc, committee. I think this president should be impeached before she brings even more harm to our membership. Not only now but later on as past president she will have some power and power in her hands is like having a kite club in Cuba. Right now this issue is effecting the membership in Region 1. I doubt that other RD's have even let their members know what is happening in Region 1 and how it may effect them in the future. I may be the first they try to remove but I get the feeling I may not be the last.

This is a copy of a letter I sent to our president just after our meeting Jan 17th to try and talk her out of her actions. There is no talking to this woman from the few times that I have met her at conventions and through our board meetings I can tell you she has tunnel vision it's her way or the highway. Look at my letter and see for yourself.

Dear Sue,

I am writing to you to try and save yourself and the AKA a lot of trouble and headaches. I think your move to have me removed as RD is a huge mistake. My regional reports over the years have been constant as was as my actions as RD. Yes I have never seen things your way per say but at least I've been constant. Most of the members in my region love the way I have represented them and I'm sure they are going to back me up to the fullest. As of yet I have not sent anything out to my region about the action you took against me the other night. I'm sure you know this news will travel like wildfire and I'm pretty sure a lot of people will see through you and your presidency will be tainted. I also want you to know that I plan on seeking legal counsel and perhaps taking a law suit against you and the association for your actions. Woody

Nothing I have ever said to her over the years or other people for that matter has changed her views on any subject unless of course it was her idea. Our friend Glenn Davison has been trying to get something going with the AKA's kite education program for at least the past three mouths. He has cc me his e-mails to her on this subject and I'm pretty sure he still has not heard back from her. Take a look at the AKA's kite forum and look at the president's message and see what she's doing to keep our association going strong. She says stuff like this read below

WE'RE WORKING HARD

The Board of Directors has had their first meeting of the year this week. We discussed some exciting possibilities for this year. We also discussed some difficult issues that the Board will be addressing in the near future. The best interests of the Association are at the forefront of our discussions and the board is strongly committed to serving the Association, even in difficult decisions

I was sitting in on this meeting and I didn't hear anything exciting other than National Kite Month is coming fast. And some talk about going to Wisconsin or Minnesota for convention in 2009. I'm not sure if I would call that exciting and little did I know the difficult decisions were about removing me as your RD.

Woody Woods

To: ConnectiKITERS

From: DAVE BUTLER

Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 05:35:22 -0000

Subject: [connectikiters] Re: Reconsider Woody Region 1 Director Removal "Proposals"

I was reading through the recent description of the eBay auctions for the AKA:

** Beginning of Woody quote **

My third proposal was to help raise funds for the AKA through an e-bay
auction. Hey this one was looking like it might work out ok. I wasn't
getting a lot of support from the BOD but I was getting some. Mel set
up an e-bay account and we started to get donations from BOD members
asking members, kite shops and manufacturers for donations for the
e-bay auction. I myself being a fighter kite flyer was putting
together the best fighter kite box ever starting with a custom fighter
box filled to the gills with fighters from the best builders in the
country. This would have been a priceless item and still is. The
e-bay auction wasn't going as well as the BOD/Exc. Comm. wanted. They
keep saying we could get a lot more for that stuff at convention.
There was a big "tado" over a set of Betty Hirschmann's kite pins and
the e-bay auction was stopped. The bottom line was the AKA wanted more
money for items that were donated for that purpose. I still have that
fighter kite box and I plan on asking each of the folks that made a
donation how they want me to handle it. You see folks it's all about
the bucks $$$.

** End of Woody quote **

Being both treasurer and not being around when this all started, I
thought it best to read through the history and check with Mel. Woody
was indeed in on the proposal of the Ebay auctions, but it would be
more appropriate to give credit for all the work to Mel, who did all
the eBay logistics, received the donations and made the eBay postings,
and also give credit to those who actually made the donations.
Further, the Ebay auctions did not stop because of Betty Hirshmann's
pins. The AKA eBay auctions also did NOT peter out because items
merely sold for less than the AKA auction would have gotten. The AKA
eBay auctions did peter out because items sold dead cheap. The final
three auctions went very low (e.g. Mel expressed great disappointment
that the last auction, an art banner, went for only $85; that probably
didn't truly cover original artists costs and shipping). Mel then
noted that we should figure out how to properly promote our items
before we start putting them on again (it is true that no one, not
even Woody, has figured out how to successfully promote our items).
Also according to Mel, there was another important reason Ebay petered
out: people stopped sending him items to eBay. If Woody will send Mel
that fighter collection set, I am sure that Mel would put them on Ebay
for us. If not, then since these donations were to the AKA, it might
be best to send them to the AKA auction committee.

Dave Butler

AKA Treasurer

To: AKA Board, nekite, ConnectiKITERS, NYKE

From: WOODY

Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 07:49:11 EST

Subject: [connectikiters] Correction

Late last night I was made aware that the convention manger Maggie Vols is doing the bulk of the convention planning now. Maggie has negotiated with at least six sites for the '08 convention. She is doing 100% of the work along with leading the research and evaluation work. I stand corrected but this is the first year we have a new convention chair and as most of you know our last convention chair was Sue Skinner and just about every little detail had to run through her. I doubt if I will get any credit for the amount of work Maggie is doing now as I was the only BOB member who ever questioned anything about her duty's and pay.

Woody

To: LHSO14B, ConnectiKITERS

From: "Barbara Meyer"

Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:42:31 -0600

Subject: [connectikiters] Convention manager

In [ConnectiKITERS], WOODY. .. wrote:

>
> Late last night I was made aware that the convention manger Maggie Vols is
> doing the bulk of the convention planning now. Maggie has negotiated with at
> least six sites for the '08 convention. She is doing 100% of the work along
> with leading the research and evaluation work. I stand corrected but this is
> the first year we have a new convention chair and as most of you know our last
> convention chair was Sue Skinner and just about every little detail had to
> run through her. I doubt if I will get any credit for the amount of work
> Maggie is doing now as I was the only BOB member who ever questioned anything
> about her duty's and pay.
>
> Woody

Not so fast! Every year each contractor for the AKA is evaluated. The evaluation form lists every contractual duty and asks each bod member to rate the contractor. Now, the form has been the same for the last 3 years at least. The convention manager’s duties have been the same for the last 3 years at least. Maybe some previous RD’s could confirm that site work has always been part of the convention managers duties? Everyone else on the bod knew what the scope of Maggie’s duties were and are. Her evaluation was recently completed. Now, do you think if the scope of her work had changed she not only would continue doing it at the same price, but not even mention the change?

Did you bother read the evaluation form and find out what her duties were? You’ve evaluated her 2 or 3 times! Now, you declare this a non issue? What questions did you have about her duties? Did you ever ask a specific question or just complain?

Barbara

PS If any one wants to see the blank evaluation form get in touch with the contracts chair, Gayle Woodul

Editor's Note: Notice in the e-mail above that Woody does a MEA CULPA and gets stomped on.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [KitesinCNYSkies] [Fwd: Re: Region I - E-petition]

Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 06:57:28 -0500

From: Jim Swem

Reply-To: KitesinCNYSkies

To: KitesinCNYSkies

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: Region I - E-petition

Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 15:45:25 -0700

From: Susan Skinner <president@aka.kite.org>

Organization: American Kitefliers Association

To: jmswem

Thank you for letting us know you support Mr Woods, your input has been provided to the AKA Board of Director for their consideration.

Because there has been some confusion as to what actually has or may occur, please let me recap the situation.

Mr Woods has not been removed as the Region 1 Director at this time. He has been give 30 days notice per the AKA Bylaws by the Board of the intent (this does not mean it will be done, only that it may be done) to remove him as a Director.

On Feb 20th there will be a special Board meeting. Mr Woods is invited to this meeting and will be able to respond to the concerns the Board presented to him last week. At that time the Board may decide to vote to remove him.

Unlike other Board motions, the bylaws specify that three-fourths must vote to remove Mr Woods for the motion to pass. I as president have no authority to remove Mr Woods from the Board and it takes more than a simple majority for even the Board to remove him.

I assure you every member of the Board would like the situation to be over with so they could get back to flying kites however the Board has a responsibility to look into the situation it has been presented with, even when that task is unpleasant. The column Mr Woods submitted was not the writings of someone who loves what they are doing. The column was also not the only issue that led to the Board giving him 30 days notice. Just because the wind is not going in Mr Woods direction does not mean he has the right to attack me personally. While I do fully support the actions of the Board to give Mr Woods notice, it is slander on his part to say I am personally responsible and that I have it out for him.. In his own emails & postings he has stated the Board has had issues with him for over a year and that only two Board members spoke up in his defense at the last Board meeting. How can that be if this is just a personal attack on my part?

The Board takes the current situation very seriously, and is reviewing all the information available to them from the members and Mr Woods into consideration at this difficult time.

Susan Skinner

President, American Kitefliers Association

> *******************************************************************************
> Name: James M. Swem
> Address: ***********
> City: ***********
> State: NY
> ZipCode: *****
> Email: @
> AKA_Member: No
> Signed: James M. Swem Kites in Central NY Skies
> Submit: Submit Information
> Petition_Statement: "I support Robert 'Woody' Woods as Region I Director and wish to express my opinion that he remain in the position for the remainder of his term."
>
> Comments:
>
> Lest we forget that we started flying kites because they are fun amazing and neat!
>More than one or two people have dropped their lines and walked away, because somebody
>got too big for their britches, too stuffy for what was going on and way overrated in their position.
>Just because things are not flying your way does not mean that the wind is all wrong,
>it just isn't blowing the way you like. Find a different kite, and fly with what you have - adapt.
>Kite is still a kite........ fly and have fun! Enjoy other kites. Love them for where they are at. Let Woody do his job - that he Loves!
>

To: nekite

From: STEVE SANTOS

Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:37:31 -0500

Subject: [connectikiters] Re: [NEKITE] RE: Region One Director removal

Marty- well put as always!

Bottom line - they are mishandling this situation.

Steve Santos

-----Original Message-----

From: MARTY SASAKI

To: [NEKITE]

Sent: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 1:49 AM

Subject: Re: [NEKITE] RE: Region One Director removal

I would like to follow up a little on what Gary Quinton previously
wrote in his response to Barbara Meyer's note...

On 1/28/07, Gary Quinton wrote:

> Barbara Meyer, vp1 Wrote

> SNIP

> >So, you're unhappy with the AKA, what are the top 5 things on your list that

> >you would like to see changed? I'd like to promise the board will work on

> >those. For that, we need an atmosphere on the board where people can offer

> >ideas without worrying about getting zapped by your RD.

> I hope, no, I know that no ideas that I discussed with Woody were

> zapped by him. He just ran up against the same blockades that I did.

> If I heard 'We haven't done it that way, and we aren't going to

> change' once I heard it a dozen times.

What exactly is the job of the RD? Is a person doing their job if they

disagree with what is being said but they just go along so that the

board can finish up the business on the agenda for the meeting? If an

idea is "zapped" is this because it wasn't well thought out? wasn't

well explained/described ? was controversial? not obviously the right

thing? or just because Woody was trying to be contrary?

It certainly is a pain to have someone constantly questioning your

actions, but if the goal is to do the right thing, and not just the

politically expediant thing, then it should be the duty of a RD to be

convinced that an idea is a workable one. With limited resources it

might be arguable that the "best" solution is the only solution that

should be used.

I believe that a RD director is doing their job if they speak up when

they disagree with folks.

History is full of examples where maintaining the status quo was not

the right choice. I'm not advocating being contrary as a form of

entertainment or anything like that. Was Woody doing this during

meetings?

I don't have 5 points, but I think that looking for such things is

missing the point a bit. The AKA has had problems and will continue to

have problems. It's part of the nature of human organizations. Will

removing Woody make the AKA a better place? It sounds like it will be

easier for the board, at least for a while, but is easier for the

board necessarily better for the AKA?

One thing is sure, the actions taken so far will cause the membership

from region 1 to go down. Many people are threatening to leave if

Woody is removed, and I fear that many will leave regardless. The

question being raised is, "What is the AKA doing for me?"

Most folks don't compete, and don't attend the National Convention.

Many of the folks that I know and have flown kites with aren't members

of any kite club either. Why should anyone join the AKA?

It looks like the AKA is mishandling a "problem" board member, how can

they expect to solve the other problems being faced by the

organization?

Marty Sasaki

-- NEKITE mailing list

To: ConnectiKITERS

From: "deepwoods1965"

Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 22:16:58 -0000

Subject: [connectikiters] Re: [NEKITE] RE: Region One Director removal

--- :

Steve thank you for forwarding this I had not seen it. Also I just

think this whole thing has opened up a huge can of worms. Perhaps

Woody in his own way has finally made us all look a a supposed great

organization and say what is really happening here?

It seems every time someone else adds a comment or statement more

problems are brought up into light. I am getting disgusted with the

whole group. And I think I may have had enough of it.

I think I will just go out and enjoy some wind without any help

from the AKA. I hope I can still figure it out.

Fly the Jolly Rodger High; Dave Olsen.

------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -

> Marty- well put as always!

> Bottom line - they are mishandling this situation.

> Steve Santos

To: "Tim and Sue Boyle"

From: "Barbara Meyer"

Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 20:52:10 -0600

Subject: [connectikiters] Tim's comments

First if I could ask a favor. I am not a member of nekites, so if you could post my reply, it would be appreciated.

Hi Barbara, It's Tim this time. Thanks for the email reply. First I want to state that I normally would not complain about a volunteer's efforts but in this case I tried to help but was rebuffed (several times). It seems from the most recent e-mails it was a good thing I was rebuffed.

I don’t understand this comment. But, if your efforts were rebuffed or not welcome, it was wrong. Everyone is a volunteer, there is just not enough time to get it all done. The email gremlins slurp up messages, life intrudes.

I would like to first make additional comments/questions and then address a few of your comments.

First, Communication within the AKA is poor at best and that starts at the Executive Committee and trickles down through the organization. For example, if AKA had made the Region One clubs aware of the disruptive effects of the RD we would have addressed it in-house and if that didn't work I expect that you would have had our support. But that's not the way this went down.

You have my complete agreement, that communication has not been handled well. The AKA has relied on self reporting by the RD back to the region and from the RD back to the bod. Several of us have started discussing what changes can be put in place. Should the bod mail continue to be confidential? If it wasn’t we wouldn’t be in this situation. Would the members understand that sometimes the bod is just throwing around ideas on the road to a decision and feeling our way. Can we use the AKA forum more?

No one ever thought of contacting the local clubs. Region 1 is more compact and with more active clubs than most of the other regions.

BTW If you wanted additional workshops you could have asked the local clubs and I don't mean the RDs. Notices in Kiting are no substitute for direct contact with the membership. I realize that's more work but either you want this to succeed or not. In 12 years AKA has only contacted KONE for club renewal, event sanctioning and trophy sponsorship.

Barbara: This is a great idea, with your permission, I’ll pass it on to Deb Lenzen the workshop coordinator for Ocean Shores.

I also heard that Board members have been hostile toward Mel. He's been great to contact on several occasions for a variety of reasons. I also belong to several other organizations like AKA and Mel is right at the top

Barbara: No one has been hostile toward Mel. This is verging on confidential matters of contract, and it is not fair to discuss Mel’s performance review in public. Every contractor is evaluated each year by every bod member. Why? Each of us have different experiences interacting with each contractor. No one is perfect all the time at everything. The rankings are a range. For example, it is hard for me to rank how quick membership applications are processed. Typically the RD is the one worrying about that.

You asked us for five things AKA could do for me.

First I would like the membership to vote on the Convention location, in lieu of this the Board should consider more than "the bottom line" of a proposal. In addition, a Convention location should be excluded for a period of five years from hosting the Convention a second time. (You mentioned flying into Baltimore, point agreed to fully but its only 1.5 hrs from BWI) Inclusive with this the Clubs located within the convention host regions should be sent notice of the specifications for the convention. We tried to put a proposal together a few years ago but cheap hotels are few and far between in NE. Wouldn't Convention be a gas on fields that border a highway with 100,000 people on it? We fly on such a field regularly. The only catch is that rooms are pricey, however, public transportation is an option. Plus Boston is a 20 minute subway journey away. Do you want to raise kiting's visibility?( in a good way) Ocean Shores is not the way nor is Ocean City.

Barbara: Convention policy is not my area of expertise. I say this not to put you off, but not to put foot in mouth. Again, with your permission I’m going to pass your comments on to Mike Shaw the new convention chair and ask that he contact you. Realize, he has just started and is feeling his way. His committee is hard at work brainstorming ideas to welcome first timers and improve the opening reception among other things. Taking a look at how convention sites are evaluated will be a long term project for his committee. And, yes, I’d love to come to Boston. The convention requirements are supposed to be on the AKA website, if they are totally buried, drop Maggie Vohs a note and ask for an updated copy.

Second, AKA can develop lists of members (sport kite competitor/judge, single line flyer, ground display, etc.) who are willing to represent AKA at events, both in the USA and out-of-country. The lists should be a random drawing at Convention every two or three years. You want to talk about giving people value and excitement, a chance to go abroard would be a nice benefit. You can use performance bonds (cash deposits) to guarentee that AKA has acceptable representation at the event.

Barbara: Very few trips come thru the AKA. A foreign festival is looking for a specific type of flyer and often contacts them directly. For the world sport kite championships, it is the top winner. There are pros and cons to the current system and pros and cons to all alternates. I think the only invite that has come thru since October was one to India where you paid your own way over and that invite went to loads of people, not just the AKA.

Third, AKA can communicate with the Affiliate