INDEPENDENT RESEARCH PROJECTS:

LINKING LITERATURE WITH OTHER DISCIPLINES THROUGH STUDENT HIGH INTEREST ACTIVITIES

First presented at the Virginia Beach Reading Council Conference, Fall of 1996

© 1996 by Lynnette E. Fitch


RATIONALE

To best appreciate literature, I believe it needs to be interpreted within cultural, historical, political, artistic, biographical, and other contexts. For example, as a child I read and enjoyed Animal Farm, but when I was an adolescent and knew a bit about communism and revolutions and Russian history I reread it and appreciated it even more. Whatever we who teach literature can do to give students the various contexts needed to best appreciate the literature the students are reading is critical for enhancing their understanding and enjoyment.

Also, students do not naturally study the literature they like in isolation from other disciplines. For example, when as a child I became very interested in classical mythology, I did not confine my reading to just Greek and Roman myths. Rather, I investigated the art, governments, drama, history, and languages of these two cultures. I instinctively went for "the big picture" in my reading because mythology had opened the door onto a larger interest. One of the great joys I get from teaching is helping my students pursue interests piqued by things I have had them read.

Thus, in the cooperative interests of providing contexts for literary interpretation and facilitating in depth exploration in other disciplines of topics related to the literature curriculum, I developed a classroom practice that really works for me: what I call my lists of Independent Research Projects, or IRPs. The options found on these lists promote increased background knowledge (converging contexts) for interpreting literature AND they allow students to pursue individual interests stimulated by the literature in the curriculum (diverging exploration).

DEVELOPMENT

Over the past eight years of teaching, I have developed extensive IRP lists from my own knowledge and interests for the different 7th and 8th grade literature units I teach/have taught. The lists are very interdisciplinary, incorporating options relating to art, music, drama, home economics, science, history, and government. The skills utilized in the options are very diverse, allowing for individual interests and different learning styles. Since I keep the lists on disk, I can add to them whenever a new idea strikes me. My 8th grade IRP list topics are: NORSE MYTHOLOGY/THE VIKINGS/BEOWULF, WORLD EPIC HEROES/MIDDLE AGES/ARTHURIAN LEGEND, NARRATIVE POETRY/THE FRENCH REVOLUTION, and PREJUDICE/WWII/APARTHEID/JIM CROW. My 7th grade IRP list topics are: CLASSICAL MYTHOLOGY, HOLIDAY LITERATURE, and MULTICULTURAL FAMILY LITERATURE.

BENEFITS

I spend one full day each 9 weeks distributing the IRP lists to all my classes and discussing the requirements and different options on the lists. Page one is always the requirement page. I read aloud and discuss each requirement and ask for questions so that NO student can come back later and say he/she did not understand. I have gone to great pains to make the requirement page as explicit as possible so that there are not ANY loopholes or ambiguities for students to exploit! I spend the rest of the bell discussing in more detail each of the options - in fact, the discussions get so enthusiastic and tangential, that I often have trouble making it through the entire list! This discussion really gets kids enthused not only about the specific IRP options but also about the literature unit in general. Since there is 'something for everyone' on the list, the students gain a new appreciation for, a new perspective on, and a new connection with the topic of the current literature unit.

My advanced classes are REQUIRED to do a minimum of 5 IRPs each nine weeks to pass. I check for student AND parent signatures acknowledging understanding of the assignment on the IRP handout so that I have documentation should a child fall short and a parent question their grade. These projects provide additional enrichment for the advanced child. I know my advanced kids are being challenged and given the opportunity for individual exploration of their interests.

My core classes are given the option to do IRPs for extra credit. This allows students who cannot perform in other areas of the English curriculum to compensate and learn something relevant at the same time. Often, students weak in one area, say technical writing, may be strong in another area, say creative writing, and this gives those kids a chance to demonstrate their strengths and knowledge and experience success within the curriculum. Allowing the students to approach the literature unit in so many different ways almost universally insures that the students will find it relevant.

I give out the IRP lists each 9 weeks right before progress report time. That gives the kids a little over a month to work on them. If their test scores have been low and their parents want to know what the students can do to pull up their grades, all I have to do is tell them to refer to the IRP handout. It makes the parents very happy to have something concrete like that in hand. Parents also appreciate the variety of options to accommodate individual skills and interests; children are more inclined to do extra work when they feel like they have freedom of choice in selecting the assignment. When a student is absent and misses out on a classwork assignment or quiz that has already been returned, I just tell them to make up the points with an IRP. This is very convenient for me (no scrambling to make alternate forms of quizzes, no struggling to recreate the classroom environment, no reteaching what has already been taught), and it gives the students a certain sense of autonomy.

IRPs are assignments that keep on teaching in that when I display or otherwise share the work individual students have done for me, others benefit from it. It makes the individual student feel validated for< his/her contribution to the educational process to be publically recognized, and it provides a alternative to teacher or textbook for the students to learn from, which they really respond to. In a way, this is a form of cooperative learning. I have a gorgeous collection of catapults, guillotines, castles, Viking helmets, battering rams, heraldry shields, etc. from previous years on display in my room - this gets the kids enthused about the literature units before we even start! I can pull out relevant murals, paintings, and collages from former students to include on bulletin boards that I teach from for each literature unit. Really exemplary cassette tapes and reports from previous students are incorporated into my lessons. The students can see that I really value their work. They always want to know the names of the students whose work I am sharing with them, and it is neat when they know one of these older kids! It adds a special element for them.

My IRPs promote a plethora of essential skills. Students are rewarded with bonus points for typing/word processing, which encourages them to master keyboarding. They may choose from options in creative writing, technical writing, critical research, interpretive listening or reading, analyses of film, and public speaking. There are very stringent requirements regarding documenting sources, so they learn to be responsible about giving credit for the work of others. Ethics are reinforced with a strict honor pledge policy. Many of the options encourage parent and/or community involvement - these projects are often a good way for parents and other adults to interact with kids on something that is academic yet not tedious. Written IRPs are kept in the students' writing portfolios, giving them and me additional fodder for assessing their progress throughout the school year.

ASSESSMENT

Since I do grades in my class based on how many points a student earns out of 1000 in the course of the nine weeks, students do not receive a letter grade for the IRP work they turn in. Rather, they receive a certain number of points per project based subjectively on how much effort they have put into their finished product. Written projects are not graded on mechanics as this would create an unfair bias in favor of non-written IRPs AND would entail too much correcting time at the end of the nine weeks (I give them up until the last Friday of the quarter to turn their IRPs in). ALL IRPs receive written comments from me as well as notification of the number of points received on the project. If requirements, such as the honor pledge or bibliography format, were not met then the student will receive NO points. A typical report, for example, that conforms to requirements may earn 20 points. If someone turned one in that was absolutely spectacular, however, they would receive a higher number of points, such as 30 or 40, to reward their extra efforts. After the first grading period, students have a very clear idea of how this all works and can basically earn the grade of their choice if they are willing to work for it.


Back to Lynnette Fitch's Home Page