In my 1999+1 essay, I referred to the prophecy of Nostradamus (Century X no. 72):
| L'an mil neuf cens nonante neuf sept mois Du ciel viendra vn grand Roy d'effrayeur Resusciter le grand Roy d'Angolmois, Auant apres Mars regner par bon heur. |
The year 1999, seventh month, From the sky will come a great King of Terror: To bring back to life the great King of the Mongols, Before and after Mars to reign by good luck. |
I believe Nostradamus was just making this stuff up. If a meteor does hit in September, I will publicly apologize. But, I am pretty certain Nostradamus will be proved wrong. Many of the quatrains of Nostradamus have been used multiple times as predictions of different events. Many others are so meaningless, they will never be used to interpret anything. The point is that the quatrains are usually assigned meaning after a big event occurs, thus creating a post-occurrence miracle effect. The sept mois in the quatrain has always been interpreted as July. If something happens in September that fits better, it will be thought that Nostradamus meant September all along.
Update (Oct. 1999): Headlines were even more boring in September than they were in July. A big earthquake hit Taiwan, but a bigger one hit Turkey in August. Hurricane Floyd was the only other exception. A link to the sight that predicted the meteor in September has been removed, the sight was shutdown.
The Mathematics of Prophecy and Chaos
As for the mathematics of prophecy, it is a primary task of mathematics to predict future outcomes. The process starts with collecting data to use as a starting point representing now. Then mathematically modeling every aspect of what you want to predict, then extrapolate (look) forward in time to produce a predicted outcome. Known flaws in the model can be used to figure out probable outcomes or what the odds are. Then different scenarios can be looked at and wise decisions can be made. In mathematics, prophecy is not about fate, it is about creating the future.
The problem is that it can be proven mathematically that prophecy in regards to most things is impossible. We can predict with reasonable accuracy the position of the planets in the sky and when and where eclipses will happen for the next 10,000 years. The accuracy is so good, even Nostradamus can predict when Mars will be in the sky 440 years into the future. Yet, we cannot accurately predict the weather beyond a 24 hour period. Welcome to Chaos theory where even the tiniest difference in the beginning could lead to radically different results.
In chaos theory, what is really important in predicting an outcome is to know exactly the initial state. For example, it might be possible to know the outcome of a throw of the dice if we know its exact starting position, its exact speed and its initial spin. But, if even one of these measures is even slightly off, most likely our projected outcome will be as well. The wind current in the room, like someone smoking a cigarette next to the table, could be enough to throw off the outcome. That is chaos.
Chaos affects every prediction, even though we know the position of the planets 10,000 years from now. We cannot measure the planets current position accurate enough to know where they will be positioned 1,000,000 years from now. You may ask what is stopping us from making accurate position readings so as to predict the future. The answer is the quantum uncertainty principle, which says it is impossible to measure accurately the position and the velocity of an electron at the same time. That uncertainty is enough not to know exactly where that electron will be a fraction of a second later.
Anything that relies on the position of molecules is affected heavily by chaos, what Einstein called Brownian motion. The weather is effected by the flow of air molecules, hence chaotic. We can predict weather accurately (within two degrees) about a day in advance, but extended forecasts beyond a week are just guesses. Predicting what a person is going to do in a given situation relies on the molecules and the flow of electrical energy within the brain. Hence largely chaotic.
So making even a vague statement about what will happen 440 years from now is pretty much impossible, unless you are a god capable of getting around the uncertainty principle or with the capabilities of forcing something to happen. As smart as Nostradamus was, I seriously doubt he is capable of either of these.
Newcomb's Paradox
All of the problems inherent in prophecy can be illustrated by a famous thought experiment called Newcomb's Paradox. A psychic approaches you with two boxes. The first box is yours to keep and either contains a million dollars or nothing. He then offers the second box which contains a thousand dollars, which you can take or leave. The psychic gives you this warning, "I have foreseen whether or not you will take the second box. If you do take the second box, you will find the first box will be empty. If you do not take the second box, the first box will have a million dollars. This is not a magic trick, the money will not vanish if it is in there, I have already made my choice and the box is yours." This psychic is pretty accurate, he is known to be right 90% of the time. Do you take the guaranteed thousand dollars or do you pass and hope the psychic was right and take the million.
Obviously, the million dollars is what you want, but you have a guaranteed $1000. The box that might contain the money is yours already regardless of the psychics claim. Why not take the other box as well?
On the other hand, if the psychic really is 90% accurate, the expected return on taking the second box is $101,000. While the expected return if you leave the second box behind is $900,000. Playing the percentages means leaving the second box. You are only wagering money that is not yours to begin with, if you lose you are back to where you started.
This problem, dating back to the 60's has been analyzed to death with various scientific and science fiction explanations. See the last chapter of the book Labyrinths of Reason by William Poundstone for a complete summary. The ultimate conclusion of this paradox analysis is one of two possibilities: 1. the psychic is really a hypnotist who is controlling your choice by hypnotic suggestion, probably forcing you to take the second box so he is not out a million. 2. the psychic did a survey and found that 90% of the population believes in psychic ability enough not to take the second box, so his 90% accurate claim will work if he always puts the million in the first box, ergo you may as well take the second box.
How to foresee the future
There is no such thing as fortune telling except accurate mathematical modeling which is possible only under certain circumstances. If God can see the future it is because he understands the mathematical model that underlies the whole universe.
Lets say you want everyone to think that you can see the future, how do you create the illusion. Here are five simple techniques:
In the world of mathematics, fortune telling is limited to that which can be accurately modeled, simulated, or statistically analyzed. Chaos theory says that there are limits to the accuracy of our predictions, based on how accurate our knowledge of the initial state is, and how far into the future we want to look. Fortune telling beyond these limits is nothing but psychological manipulation and trickery.