I say ‘simple heraldry’ because this is a complex subject,
and I am not a real expert; I just have a rough working knowledge of
medieval heraldry. One or two people have asked for explanations of
terms I thought were well-known - I was wrong! The object of
the
article is just to explain the basic principles – if you need
more, then you can always read books on the subject or, better still,
talk to a herald!
The focus of this little article is on the middle ages, so I have left
out later developments. For example a woman of these days may be
granted arms in her own right; this was unheard of in medieval times,
when she would invariably use her father’s arms, or in rare
cases, a version thereof. (The only rare case I can think of off hand
is Katherine Swynford, whose arms were slightly different to those of
her father’s, the wheels of Roet being shown broken in reference
to St Katherine.)
The original objective of heraldry was recognition in battle. Early
knights did not have individual ‘coats of arms’ but simply
rallied around their lord’s banner, which might itself be no more
than a piece of coloured cloth.
From round about the 12th century onwards, knights start to have
individual devices painted on their shields. (Later they were also worn
on the body on a jupon that covered the armour.) Over time these became
identified with particular individuals – trade marked if you like
– and it was necessary to evolve a system where no two were
exactly alike. Further, as the arms became hereditary, it became
important to distinguish between a man and his sons, uncles and
cousins. So marks of cadency or difference were invented, to make quite
subtle changes to the basic design that show a relationship but also
make it clear which individual is which.
(If you read a modern book of heraldry it will often tell you that the
third son has this difference and the fifth son that. This sort of
detailed codification had not been worked out in the Middle Ages, and
beyond a certain point they did as they liked!)
As time went by, coats of arms weren’t just used on battle
shields. For example, they got put onto seals, and were used as
decoration of tombs, to show off noble kinship. Thus it became
important to accommodate such things as marriages. Eventually shields
and jupons fell out of fashion and these secondary uses became the
principal ones.
In its most basic form, the arms of a husband and wife are impaled on a
shield. In other words, the shield is divided in half down the middle.
The man’s arms go on the heraldic right or dexter – and the
woman’s on the heraldic left or sinister. (Heraldic left or right
is determined from the point of view of the knight holding the shield,
not yours as you look at it.)
If the woman is an heiress, then the arms are quartered instead of
being impaled. This means the shield is divided into four quarters.
Normally the man’s arms then go into the top left and bottom
right quarters as you look at it – the first and fourth quarters
as they are known. The woman’s arms go into the other two
quarters – the second and third. If they have a son, these
quartered arms descend to him – impaled arms are specific to the
couple only and their son takes his father’s arms.
If the woman’s inheritance is judged more important than the
man’s then her quarterings go in the first and fourth, and his in
the second and third. What about a woman’s arms? Well as a maiden lady
she normally
uses her father’s, but in a lozenge (a rhombus, or diamond
shape), not on a shield. As a married woman or widow she normally
impales or quarters her husband’s arms with her father’s,
again carrying them on a lozenge.
You may think that for something that promised to be simple this is all
pretty complex – and you are right, it is. So let’s look at some worked
examples, using as a resource a photograph of the York Window at
Fotheringhay. This window is one of the features of Fotheringhay
Church, and it’s even more interesting once you understand exactly what
it represents. (Photo reproduced courtesy of Bill Benstead and the
Worcester Branch of the Richard
III Society)
The
top shield on the left is the matrimonial impalement of the arms of
Edmund of Langley, first Duke of York, and Isabel of Castile. Edmund’s
arms, the ones on the left of the shield as we look at it, are
basically those of his father Edward III, France and England quartered.
(France was regarded as the more important kingdom, so the lilies of
France are in the first and fourth quarters.) The white markings across
the top half of the shield are Edmund’s mark of cadency, a label of
three points – which in real life have three red roundels (balls) on
each of the tabs, distinguishing Edmund from his brothers. Marks of
cadency come in various forms, but one of the most common is a label
which is a white horizontal line from which three or more smaller lines
(tabs) descend. Its purpose is to distinguish one (male) family member
from another. Isabel’s arms are those of her father, Castile and Leon,
quartered. (I don’t think you will need telling which quarters
represent which!) |
Immediately
below this shield is a very similar shield, representing Edmund and
Isabel’s son, Edward, the second Duke of York, with his wife, Philippa
Mohun. You may note, that Edward’s shield has a reduced number of
lilies compared to his father. This represents the change from France
Ancient to France Modern, which in England took place about 1403, in
France a little earlier. Philippa’s arms are those of her father, Lord
Mohun of Dunster. |
Below
these two shields is the famous Falcon and Fetterlock of York, in this
case with a closed Fetterlock, as used by the family prior to Edward
IV’s accession in 1461. This is a cognizance, as opposed to a coat of
arms. The arms were only worn by their owner, but the cognizance could
be worn by any York servant or retainer, as well as being blazoned on
such things as horse-furnishings and buildings.
|
The
top middle shield is the royal arms of Richard III – you can tell it’s
the King’s arms because it doesn’t have any mark of cadency, or
difference. The royal arms were sometimes displayed on buildings as a
sign of loyalty, but anyone who used them in any other context was
effectively claiming that he was the king! This was not generally a
wise move. |
 Below
is the famous White Boar cognizance, and below that Anne Neville’s
quarterings. This is example of the more elaborate arms that developed
from the 15th century onwards, used by people who wanted to emphasise
their impressive ancestry. These complex devices are effectively a
family tree expressed as heraldry. Clare, Beauchamp, Montagu and
Despenser are among the families represented. (Isabel Neville’s arms
would have been identical, assuming they both chose to use a complex
version of their father’s arms.) |

Beneath this shield is the White Rose, another family cognizance, one
that came from the Mortimers. |
The
top shield on the right hand side is the impaled arms of Richard of
Conisbrough, Earl of Cambridge, the second son of Edmund of Langley,
and his wife Anne Mortimer. Interestingly, Richard’s difference is a
border to the shield – probably because he was a younger son of a
younger son in a very big family and they were running out of
differences. Anne Mortimer’s arms are those of her father, the Earl of
March, and are another example of quartering. Why are Cambridge and
Anne’s shields themselves not quartered, given that she was an heiress?
Well, I can only think it is because she was not an heiress in her
lifetime, and that they would have (correctly) used this impalement
during their marriage. |
The
final impaled shield is that of Richard, Duke of York and Cecily
Neville. Richard’s shield is identical to that of Edward, Duke of York,
but this is OK because a) Richard was Edward’s successor in title and
b) by the time Richard used this shield Edward was no longer alive.
Cecily’s shield is shown here as the full, undifferenced – that is
without a mark of cadency -- arms of Neville because her father was the
Earl of Westmorland. If you look at the similar Neville arms in Anne
Neville’s quarterings you’ll see that there’s a bar of cadency –
because her father, Warwick, was the son of a younger Neville
son! |
Below this shield is another cognizance, the
White Lion of Mortimer. |
I hope this helps you understand the basics of medieval heraldry.