This Site Best Viewed at 1280 x 1024
The Perfect Terrorist Plan To Level The Twin Towers Created In 1976!
ALEX JONES INTERVIEWS GREG SZYMANSKI REGARDING McNiven REVELATIONS
American Free Press | March 20, 2005
By Greg Szymanski
Our own U.S. Army devised a plan commissioned by Congress to bring down the WTC using commercial airliners and box cutters as weapons.
The laundry list of terrorist warnings handed to the Bush administration prior to 9/11 makes the President and others look like “bumbling idiots or a bunch of conniving criminals” responsible for the mass murders at the Twin Towers and in Afghanistan and Iraq.
These are the harsh words of Timothy McNiven, an outspoken critic of the President’s handling of 9/11 and a 29-year U.S. Defense Department operative still under contract with the government.
He says not only did the Bush administration purposely ignore Al Q’aida in the months preceding the WTC attacks, but the situation is even more disturbing, considering his military unit way back in 1976 devised a mock terrorist attack of the Twin Towers exactly like what occurred on 9/11.
McNiven, who first went public in an affidavit included in a 9/11-related federal conspiracy (RICO) lawsuit filed against Bush and others in 2004, claims his unit was ordered to create the “perfect terrorist plan” using commercial airliners as weapons and the Twin Towers as their target.
The publicized version of the study, commissioned by Congress, was to identify security lapses and submit corrective measures to lawmakers. However, McNiven claims the real purpose of the study was to brainstorm how to pull off the perfect terrorist attack using the exact same 9/11 scenario.
The study, commissioned to C-Battery 2/81st Field Artillery, U.S. Army, stationed in Strassburg, Germany in 1976, specifically devised the scenario of the Twin Towers being leveled by Middle Eastern terrorists using commercial airliners and even plastic box cutters to bypass security.
To silence critics, McNiven has successfully passed a credible lie detector test regarding his participation in the study as well as other specific orders given to him by his superiors in case of a real attack on the Twin Towers.
The head of the 1976 mock terrorist plan was Lt. Michael Teague of Long Island, who McNiven says was given specific orders by higher-ups in the military to use the Twin Towers as the terrorist target.
McNiven said he has been unable to contact Lt. Teague, but was interested in his opinion now that “the 9/11 attacks happened the way we planned them in 1976.”“I remember Lt. Teague changed the scenario of the supposed study from a 100 story building to the Twin Towers,” recalled McNiven, emphasizing that Lt. Teague was acting on specific orders from unknown superiors.
“He then said he thought it was very strange to be asked to devise a plan to blow up your own home town. But as I watched the Twin Towers really collapse on the morning of September 11th, I realized I was watching the very same thing we
devised in the 1976.”
Since that ominous realization, McNiven has devoted his entire life to alerting the American public about the similarities between 9/11 and the 1976 study without much success, his story basically being ignored by politicians and the mainstream media.
“Why am I doing this? Why have I spent every waking hour trying to bring this story to the American people?” asked McNiven, claiming he still is following a strange direct military order given to him more than 25 years ago.“
During the course of the terrorist plan we were devising, I made the statement to Lt. Teague that if the WTC was ever attacked like we planned, I’d go public. I was then physically assaulted and told never to reveal anything we were doing regarding the Twin Towers.”
However, about a week later a strange turn of events occurred. For no apparent reason, McNiven claims his superiors completely changed their minds.
“I was given the direct order that if the Twin Towers were ever attacked the way we discussed in the 1976 study, I was to do everything in my power to bring the similarities to the attention of the American people.
“I have no idea why they changed their minds, but I was then emphatically told that this order was never to be rescinded – never – because those who would rescind it, would be the very same people who turned against the American people.”
Besides taking a lie detector to verify his story, McNiven has made public a detailed list of about 40 names of those individuals who took part in the mock terrorist plan, including Col. Robert Morrison, Maj. Joe Dipiero, Sgt. Middleton, Sgt. Arroyo and many others.
“There were also people from the Defense Department and the CIA who were monitoring the study, but I wasn’t able to get their names,” he added.
Some of McNiven’s most recent assignments with the Defense Department include work on the Northwest Drug Task Force and various other drug smuggling and weapons trafficking cases.
Timothy McNIven's website: http://www.codenamegrillfire.com/index.php?n=1&id=1
COMMENTS:
"U.S. oil peaked in the 1970’s. The Twin Towers were built in the 1970’s. Global oil is alleged to be peaking now. The Twin Towers were nicknamed “David” and “Nelson” after David and Nelson Rockefeller, whose family, along with the Rothschilds created the global oil industry and have both been major proponents of global government and population control.
"If completely confirmed 100% then this is THE smoking gun, over and above
Northwoods, the NORAD stand down, the
explosives in the
buildings, or any other piece of 9/11 evidence with the exception perhaps of
the pod,
missile and bomb on Flight 175. It’s going to be interesting to see how they pass this one off as a ‘coincidence’
...
WTF??!!!
THE "POD" - ALL NETWORKS - ALL NEWS STATIONS
EXTRA PIECE OF EQUIPMENT IN PLANE SIGHT!
FLIGHT 175 ANOMALY
University Concludes "Pod" Is Three Dimensional Object - Not Shadow
Back in June 2003 La Vanguardia in Barcelona, Spain, published an investigative report on the plane that slammed into the South Tower. The report was a simple affair, it used the photo we see
above on the left and wondered what these strange objects attached to the underside of the Flight 175 might be, and whether they were just an optical illusion. After a thorough digital image analysis by a Spanish university, the article came to the conclusion that the objects were three-dimensional in nature and could not have been caused by shadows or reflections.
Full Story Click Here
How does a 757, which is 124 feet wide, and 44 feet high, fit into a 16 foot round hole and leave no wreckage or even damage the Pentagon lawn? Notice the 3 un-broken windows right above the same hole in which the 757 was alleged to have struck and been magically 'absorbed' into the Pentagon, leaving no wreckage outside the impact area, and scarcely any inside the Pentagon as well. Also notice the un-broken window, dangling, hanging, just to the left of the impact area.
Click On Above Image Or Here For Excellent Pentagon Flash Presentation
Is this the best evidence that the U.S. Government can provide to prove that a Boeing 757 crashed into the Pentagon? That silhouette looks a bit small to be a 757, and I didn't think that 757's use solid rocket propellant as is evidenced by that white smoke trailing behind the mystery aircraft...
What hit the Pentagon? I believe that we can rule out the the 757...
What's Wrong With This Picture?
Probably closer to the truth....
Perhaps this is what the eye witness was referring to when describing the object that hit the Pentagon as a "Missile with wings..."
GOT CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS?
WTC 7 "pulled" in typical controlled demolitions fashion...
Two unexplained "spikes" in the
seismic record from September 11 indicate huge bursts of energy shook the ground
beneath the World Trade Center's twin towers — just as the buildings began to
collapse.
Pools of "molten steel" were found at the base of the collapsed
twin towers weeks after the collapse. Although the energy source for these
incredibly hot areas has yet to be explained, New York seismometers recorded
huge bursts of energy, which caused unexplained seismic "spikes" at
the beginning of each collapse. These spikes suggest that massive underground
explosions may have literally knocked the towers off their foundations causing
them to collapse.
by Kevin Ryan
Underwriters Laboratories
The following letter was sent today by Kevin Ryan of
Underwriters Laboratories to Frank Gayle of the National Institute of Standards
and Technology (NIST). Underwriters Laboratories is the company that certified
the steel components used in the construction of the
Dr. Gayle,
Having recently reviewed your team's report of 10/19/04,
I felt the need to contact you directly.
As I'm sure you know, the company I work for certified
the steel components used in the construction of the WTC buildings. In
requesting information from both our CEO and Fire Protection business manager
last year, I learned that they did not agree on the essential aspects of the
story, except for one thing - that the samples we certified met all
requirements. They suggested we all be patient and understand that UL was
working with your team, and that tests would continue through this year. I'm
aware of UL's attempts to help, including performing tests on models of the
floor assemblies. But the results of these tests appear to indicate that the
buildings should have easily withstood the thermal stress caused by pools of
burning jet fuel.
There continues to be a number of "experts"
making public claims about how the WTC buildings fell. One such person, Dr.
Hyman Brown from the WTC construction crew, claims that the buildings collapsed
due to fires at 2000F melting the steel (1). He states "What caused the
building to collapse is the airplane fuel…burning at 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit.
The steel in that five-floor area melts." Additionally, the newspaper that
quotes him says "Just-released preliminary findings from a National
Institute of Standards and Technology study of the
We know that the steel components were certified to ASTM
E119. The time temperature curves for this standard require the samples to be
exposed to temperatures around 2000F for several hours. And as we all agree, the
steel applied met those specifications. Additionally, I think we can all
agree that even un-fireproofed steel will not melt until reaching red-hot
temperatures of nearly 3000F (2). Why Dr. Brown would imply that 2000F would
melt the high-grade steel used in those buildings makes no sense at all.
The results of your recently published metallurgical
tests seem to clear things up (3), and support your team's August 2003 update as
detailed by the Associated Press (4), in which you were ready to "rule out
weak steel as a contributing factor in the collapse." The evaluation of
paint deformation and spheroidization seem very straightforward, and you noted
that the samples available were adequate for the investigation. Your comments
suggest that the steel was probably exposed to temperatures of only about
500F (250C), which is what one might expect from a thermodynamic analysis of
the situation.
However the summary of the new NIST report seems to
ignore your findings, as it suggests that these low temperatures caused exposed
bits of the building’s steel core to "soften and buckle." (5)
Additionally this summary states that the perimeter columns softened, yet your
findings make clear that "most perimeter panels (157 of 160) saw no
temperature above 250C." To soften steel for the purposes of forging,
normally temperatures need to be above1100C (6). However, this new summary
report suggests that much lower temperatures were be able to not only soften the
steel in a matter of minutes, but lead to rapid structural collapse.
This story just does not add up. If steel from those
buildings did soften or melt, I’m sure we can all agree that this was
certainly not due to jet fuel fires of any kind, let alone the briefly burning
fires in those towers. That fact should be of great concern to all Americans.
Alternatively, the contention that this steel did fail at temperatures around
250C suggests that the majority of deaths on 9/11 were due to a safety-related
failure. That suggestion should be of great concern to my company.
There is no question that the events of 9/11 are the
emotional driving force behind the War on Terror. And the issue of the WTC
collapse is at the crux of the story of 9/11. My feeling is that your
metallurgical tests are at the crux of the crux of the crux. Either you can make
sense of what really happened to those buildings, and communicate this quickly,
or we all face the same destruction and despair that come from global decisions
based on disinformation and “chatter”.
Thanks for your efforts to determine what happened on
that day. You may know that there are a number of other current and former
government employees that have risked a great deal to help us to know the truth.
I've copied one of these people on this message as a sign of respect and
support. I believe your work could also be a nucleus of fact around which the
truth, and thereby global peace and justice, can grow again. Please do what you
can to quickly eliminate the confusion regarding the ability of jet fuel fires
to soften or melt structural steel.
1. http://www.boulderweekly.com/archive/102104/coverstory.html
2. CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 61st edition, pg D-187
3. http://wtc.nist.gov/media/P3MechanicalandMetAnalysisofSteel.pdf
4. http://www.voicesofsept11.org/archive/911ic/082703.php
5. http://wtc.nist.gov/media/NCSTACWTCStatusFINAL101904WEB2.pdf (pg 11)
6. http://www.forging.org/FIERF/pdf/ffaaMacSleyne.pdf
Kevin Ryan
Site Manager Environmental Health Laboratories A Division
of Underwriters Laboratories
"The process of transformation," the plan said, " is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor." - PNAC September 2000 (Pg. 63)
+
=
THE REAL TERRORISTS!!!
THESE TWO 911 DOCUMENTARIES WILL COMPLETELY ALTER YOUR WORLDVIEW FOREVER!
PAINFUL QUESTIONS PRESENTATION BY ERIC HUFSCHMID AND SOFIA
IT'S NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY IF YOU CAN PROVE IT.
Executive Office of the President logs into 'LetsRoll911.org' right after the November Election. 3rd Time now!
"YOU DON'T CATCH FLAK UNLESS YOU ARE OVER THE TARGET!" - Phil Jayhan - LetsRoll911.org
Wake up sheeple! 911 was an inside job!
A special thanks goes out to Phil Jayhan and the rest of the true patriots of freedom at LetsRoll911.org for their tireless efforts in uncovering the truth of 911.
