<%@LANGUAGE="VBSCRIPT" CODEPAGE="1252"%> To Test or not to Test

The Teachers' Education Institute


Contact: Dr. David L. Mollet  tel/fax (619) 463-1270   email: tei@cox.net
6656 Reservoir Lane, San Diego, CA 92115


To test or not to test For pdf click here - click on icon for free copy of

We all want the best for our children. I do not think many of us would argue that the main responsibility for any child is with the parents who brought the child into the world. We all know of the enormous reservoir of love that we give to our children, and we know that without it children would grow up with deep psychological problems. So let us assume that whatever the circumstances, the majority of children grow up knowing they are loved not only by their parents but usually by various family members as well.

Why do I start at this point? Because it is clear that school cannot and should not replace the very close bond between parents and child. Yet the state takes the vast majority of children and has the responsibility of educating them. In one sense, they are gifted to the state by the parents. I believe that is the attitude we should nurture in our approach to children, namely they are a gift from their parents in order that they may be educated.

However, next to the parents and perhaps some other family members, who knows the children best? Yes it is, of course, the teachers who educate the children. It is clear that we need to give these professionals an excellent training and then empower them to carry out the task of educating the children under their care. When we do this, we find that the children learn and achieve. The more power we give teachers the more their children achieve. The less power we give them the less they achieve.

Recently an OECD study of student achievement was published. Finland and New Zealand came first and joint second respectively amongst countries in the developed world outperforming students in the USA; the USA was in the middle of the pack. It is worth examining and comparing education in these two countries with that of the USA. We shall also look at why Scotland has now done away with league tables for schools; why Wales will almost certainly remove testing; why each state Minister of Education in Australia has refused to let the national Ministry of Education implement testing which would have led to the ranking of schools; and why teachers in England have voted to boycott testing children.

Education in Finland
The OECD study: Knowledge and Skills for Life PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) published on Tuesday 6 April 2004 showed that Finnish teenagers are the best readers; and Finnish youth excel in science and mathematics. All this in a country where per capita income is about two-thirds of the USA (The latest year where comparison can be made is 2001: Finland $23,260 USA $35,271 with California and San Diego higher.)

I wonder how much money, time and effort has been used in California in attempts to get children to start reading as young as possible. The situation is different in Finland where children do not start school until they are seven. It is widely accepted that young children will learn more through play and, most importantly, will learn to love learning. At the age of six, you can send your child to preschool but this is optional. As expected most seven-year-olds, as far as reading proficiency is concerned, are behind children of the same age in other developed countries. They do more than catch up and become competent readers! By the age of fifteen Finnish students are the best readers in the world.

There is a focus on music throughout Finland. It is not unusual for children to learn to read music before they learn to read words. This devotion to music education results in a national attitude that music is for the wellbeing of all children and adults. Visitors are amazed at the strength of music throughout the length and breadth of the country. Finland possesses twenty-six symphony orchestras; there are five symphony orchestras in Helsinki alone. In a country of 5.2 million, there are twelve opera companies. Over two hundred and fifty operas have been composed by Finnish composers, over two-thirds of these since 1975.

As can be expected Finland produces many world-class conductors. Esa-Pekka Salonen has been artistic director of the Los Angeles Philharmonic since 1992. His debut in London with the Philharmonia Orchestra in 1983, at the age of 25, was an international sensation. Osmo Vanska is the new conductor of the Minnesota Orchestra and there are at least six other world-class conductors. There are also thirty full-time classical composers. All this is because, unlike California, Finnish people believe that music is essential for an individual's wellbeing. This results in outstanding music education for all children. Music education is indispensable for the neurological development of students. As a representative stated, "When you invest in culture, it always comes back, always." Compare this to California where the present curriculum is test driven and narrowly focused.

Education in New Zealand
The Picot Commission was set up by the New Zealand government in 1987. At that time schools came under different school districts based on different local authority areas, something akin to the USA system. The Picot Commission recommended doing away with this structure. Each school was to be community based and have its own charter. It was to be run by a Board of Trustees (usually five) each of which had to be a parent of a child attending that particular school together with the Principal and a trustee elected by the school staff.

The Board could co-opt other persons to the Board on a temporary basis if they required certain expertise. The Board establishes a Charter, a type of contract where the Board undertakes to the Minister to take all reasonable steps to administer the school in accordance with the purposes contained in the charter. Boards are required to update their charters annually and also to provide annual reports on how well they have achieved against their charter goals and to account for their spending of public money.

Teachers' salaries would still be paid on a national basis through the Ministry of Education. Educational Review Officers (EROs) were established (something akin to Her Majesty's Inspector of Schools in the UK) to oversee the whole system. School districts and numerous layers of administration became superfluous, including about half the Ministry of Education which no longer exists. The savings were given to schools directly for them to spend as they saw fit. For example, they could hire (together with other schools if this was appropriate) whatever consultants they needed on a needs basis.

The New Zealand Ministry of Education issues a set of national administration guidelines that provide a framework within which school boards need to operate. It also has a national qualifications system and it was agreed that a national examination structure should still exist for students reaching the end of high school.

Even today, when most of the developed world is obsessed with testing students of all ages, the New Zealand Ministry of Education fully appreciates that learning patterns can be different. "Successful outcomes for all students require a range of learning pathways. One size does not fit all. Children arrive at school with different early childhood experiences and different levels of development. How students learn, the pace at which they learn and their interests vary between individuals. These differences are recognized, to an extent, through the current system. This gives teachers and schools responsibility for organizational and teaching decisions and through provision for immersion learning and designated character schools. However, the current system needs to continually look for ways to provide flexible pathways, especially for learners with diverse needs." Ministry of Education, Statement of Intent, 2003-2008, Building Learning Pathways.

Education in Scotland
Recently the Scottish education minister Peter Peacock publicly declared that league tables belonged to a "past time" and were now "meaningless." He stated, "League tables owe their origins to a time past when the political currency was about competition between schools and about designing a system at a time when competition would be one of the main features of education. We are not in that situation now. I believe in universal excellence in schools and we should not have to have a league table to try and choose a school." A spokesperson for the Scottish Executive added that the reforms that were being developed would mean the end of current league tables which are based only on higher results, and do not take into account schools' other achievements. She said, "Exam results only measure one part of the school's performance. He [Mr. Peacock] wants to provide more relevant information to parents... He wants to change information available to parents and make it more meaningful."

Education in Australia
State education ministers have warned they will block any move to rank schools' performance, declaring that league tables are "inappropriate" and must be banned. At a political showdown of education ministers in Sydney on 25 April, the states forced federal Education Minister Brendan Nelson to cancel plans to implement tests that would lead to the ranking of schools.

Education in Wales
A study commissioned by the Welsh assembly suggests that the key stage tests at 11 and 14 are counter-productive, with students focusing on passing the tests rather than fully embracing subjects. The study recommends that the tests should be phased out. The devolved assembly has already put a stop to testing at seven. The Scottish parliament has also dropped the tests.

Meanwhile, Mary Bousted, general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, said: "Where Wales has gone, England should follow. Teachers do not need to test children at 11 years of age to know what standards they have achieved or where they need to go next in their learning. "England is now the only country in the UK to continue with the path of testing to destruction - it needs to stop and quickly."

Professor Richard Daugherty, who was commissioned to undertake the review, said the assessment arrangements in Wales must meet the needs of young learners at "this crucial stage in their development. What the review group has proposed is to use evidence from assessment to inform key decisions that face individual pupils and their parents. Our proposals would also ensure that we can continue to track trends and patterns of achievement across the system in Wales."

The Welsh education minister, Jane Davidson, said: "The group presents some very important recommendations for dealing with this. I shall be considering the final report with great care, taking account of the advice I have received from ACCAC [The Qualifications, Curriculum and Assessment Authority for Wales] on the review of the national curriculum and assessment more generally. I shall make a full statement on my conclusions before the summer recess."

Education in England: Members of Parliament recommend "Change way schools are judged."
"The Government was today urged to immediately overhaul the way it judges the performance of schools. An influential committee of MPs said their ratings would be dramatically altered if they took into account other factors beyond the schools' control. It said parents would be given a far better picture of a school's performance if those factors - such as economic and social deprivation - were taken into account; and it called for such information to be made available to parents for all schools next year. When such factors are taken into account some schools move from the bottom of the league table to near the top.

The House of Commons committee of public accounts has looked into the way the Department for Education and Skills measures and reports the performance of maintained secondary schools. The committee said it was not only educational factors that affected schools' performances. The National Audit Office has demonstrated how the impact of external factors can be measured and analysed to give a clearer indication of the quality of education provided by different schools.

The committee said such information would be valuable to policy-makers and to parents choosing schools for their children. It said the Department for Education and Skills should identify which external factors have a significant bearing on academic achievement and take them into account when assessing the performance of all schools - not just maintained secondaries. Adjusted performance measures have shown that specialist, faith, beacon and single sex schools outperform others. The committee said the strengths of these schools, such as a strong set of values and ethos, should be promoted across all schools. The schools' inspectorate Ofsted should identify where a school ranks in terms of academic achievement before and after taking account of external factors.

Education in England: Teachers poised to boycott pupil tests
Recently a survey was organized for the main teachers' union by Sean Neill of the Institute of Education at Warwick University. Commenting on a recent international evaluation of testing Neill stated, "Though the effect of continued testing is to raise test standards, some of this effect can be attributed to increasing familiarity with the test methods by both teachers and learners, increasing emphasis on preparation for the tests, and instruction specifically focused on the predicted outcomes of the tests." He found that teacher assessment was seen as a viable alternative to tests by 85% of the respondents.

Subsequently the National Union of Teachers (NUT) polled its members in England and Wales (the Scottish system is separate and different.) The survey found that according to teachers, "Compulsory national tests for schoolchildren are an unnecessary and stressful burden." Only 6% of teachers thought the tests were a reliable way of evaluating pupils' achievements. There was strong support for a boycott of the tests with teachers preferring to assess pupils themselves.

The NUT's general secretary of the union, Doug McAvoy, said, "This survey underlines the strong criticisms teachers have of these tests. They narrow education, limit use of professional judgment, place unnecessary stress on pupils and add significantly to the workload of teachers without producing any benefits." Some anonymous comments from teachers were included in his report. "Raising standards can effectively be done in schools with good monitoring and self-evaluation practices," said a primary school leader. Another, teaching infants, said tests "rule" all teaching in a school where children come from poor backgrounds. They need enrichment far more than brighter children from more educated families, yet they get less. Save money from SATs and give us support and resources to improve standards."

More than eight in 10 of the 30,500 teachers surveyed for the NUT (91% of primary teachers, and 85% of secondary teacher) felt tests were stressful to children. Some 90% of teachers felt the tests diminished pupils' access to a broad and balanced curriculum. The survey showed substantial support for a ballot by the NUT to boycott the tests. The majority of respondents - 67.9% - had more than 11 years' experience in teaching. Most were in England, 4% in Wales. About 57% were in primary schools.

Conclusion
The situation where students achieve the highest competencies is where teachers are given a good professional training and their teaching is empowered. Perhaps it should be incumbent on administrators to examine student achievement in countries where students outperform those of the USA and which have different administrative systems. We find two countries whose students out-perform those of the USA, possess quite different education administrative structures to those of the USA. In fact, we find that nationally and statewide the USA has been moving for some considerable time in the opposite direction to those of Finland and New Zealand. We also find that Scotland is now moving away from league tables, Wales will almost certainly follow, Australia has refused to implement them, and that teachers in England are seriously considering boycotting tests.

Empower teachers, make education a cooperative venture between parent and teacher, make schools community based, eliminate tests particularly for pre-high school students, remove school districts and layers of bureaucracy, invest in music and art - these are the ingredients for achievement and for well balanced and attaining adults. Please appreciate this is not about money. Education spending per capita on school age children is as follows: Finland $4800; New Zealand $2806; UK $3329; USA $6043. Project fifty years in the future and which countries will be in ascendancy and which in decline? The evidence speaks for itself.

Dr. David L Mollet has experience of education and teacher training on three continents namely Europe, North America and Australasia. He now works as an education consultant in California. He is available for presentations, workshops, seminars and consultancy. His writings can be viewed at http://members.cox.net/tei . He can be contacted at tei@cox.net

On a personal note: I was a Senior Lecturer of Education in the UK in 1980, and after eight years of trying to make some sort of contribution to change, I knew the politicians hold on education decision making was set in concrete . Sadly it is even worse today. In 1981 we set up home in California and I found the system here even worse.
Eventually we moved to New Zealand. I gave a presentation to the District Inspector for South Island two weeks after we arrived. I guess what I said must have made some sort of sense because much to my astonishment she phoned me two weeks later to say she had arranged for me to fly to Wellington to give a presentation to the top officials in the Ministry of Education and possibly to meet the Minister. The presentation went quite well and I thought that was that. This was a time of great change in New Zealand and the next year it was announced that a Commission (the Picot Commission) was to be set up to examine the administrative structure of pre-tertiary education in New Zealand.
I made a detailed submission along with hundreds of other people. I guess many of us were on the same wavelength because when the Commission submitted its report to parliament it recommended the changes I have described above. Parliament voted to implement the report and the changes occurred in 1988/89. In essence all school districts and their attached layers of bureaucracy were done away with, and all schools were to be community based and run as a cooperative venture between parents and teachers. Naturally I was very pleased and hopefully I made some sort of contribution to the process. We returned to California in 1995 but, if anything, I have found the situation worse than I did in the early 1980s. Tragically I find the situation here in San Diego the worst I have experienced in the developed world.
I have spent my working life trying to improve the education that children receive. At present I spend my time writing on education matters trying to make some sort of contribution to halt this immense socialization of educational ideas that is occurring through the USA at this time. I believe, particularly for elementary school children, that teaching is an art not a science and we are harming and damaging a whole generation of children due to these hardened ideas.