To test or not to test For
pdf click here -
click on icon for free copy of
We all want the best for our children. I do not think many of
us would argue that the main responsibility for any child is with
the parents who brought the child into the world. We all know of
the enormous reservoir of love that we give to our children, and
we know that without it children would grow up with deep psychological
problems. So let us assume that whatever the circumstances, the
majority of children grow up knowing they are loved not only by
their parents but usually by various family members as well.
Why do I start at this point? Because it is clear that school
cannot and should not replace the very close bond between parents
and child. Yet the state takes the vast majority of children and
has the responsibility of educating them. In one sense, they are
gifted to the state by the parents. I believe that is the attitude
we should nurture in our approach to children, namely they are
a gift from their parents in order that they may be educated.
However, next to the parents and perhaps some other family members,
who knows the children best? Yes it is, of course, the teachers
who educate the children. It is clear that we need to give these
professionals an excellent training and then empower them to carry
out the task of educating the children under their care. When we
do this, we find that the children learn and achieve. The more
power we give teachers the more their children achieve. The less
power we give them the less they achieve.
Recently an OECD study of student achievement was
published. Finland
and New Zealand came first and joint second respectively amongst
countries in the developed world outperforming students
in the USA; the USA was in the middle of the pack. It is worth
examining and comparing education in these two countries with that
of the USA. We shall also look at why Scotland has now done away
with league tables for schools; why Wales will almost certainly
remove testing; why each state Minister of Education in Australia
has refused to let the national Ministry of Education implement
testing which would have led to the ranking of schools; and why
teachers in England have voted to boycott testing children.
Education in Finland
The OECD study: Knowledge and Skills for Life
PISA (Program for International Student Assessment) published on
Tuesday 6 April 2004 showed that Finnish teenagers
are the best readers; and Finnish youth excel in science and mathematics. All
this in a country where per capita income is about two-thirds of
the USA (The latest year where comparison can be made is 2001:
Finland $23,260 USA $35,271 with California and San Diego higher.)
I wonder how much money, time and effort has been used in California
in attempts to get children to start reading as young as possible.
The situation is different in Finland where children do not start
school until they are seven. It is widely
accepted that young children will learn more through play and,
most importantly, will learn to love learning. At the age of six, you can send your child to
preschool but this is optional. As expected most seven-year-olds,
as far as reading proficiency is concerned, are behind children
of the same age in other developed countries. They do more than
catch up and become competent readers! By the age of fifteen Finnish
students are the best readers in the world.
There is a focus on music throughout Finland. It is not unusual
for children to learn to read music before they learn to read words.
This devotion to music education results in a national attitude
that music is for the wellbeing of all children and adults. Visitors
are amazed at the strength of music throughout the length and breadth
of the country. Finland possesses twenty-six symphony orchestras;
there are five symphony orchestras in Helsinki alone. In a country
of 5.2 million, there are twelve opera companies. Over two hundred
and fifty operas have been composed by Finnish composers, over
two-thirds of these since 1975.
As can be expected Finland produces many world-class
conductors. Esa-Pekka Salonen has been artistic director of the
Los Angeles Philharmonic since 1992. His debut in London with
the Philharmonia Orchestra in 1983, at the age of 25, was an
international sensation. Osmo Vanska is the new conductor of
the Minnesota Orchestra and there are at least six other world-class
conductors. There are also thirty full-time classical composers.
All this is because, unlike California, Finnish people believe
that music is essential for an individual's wellbeing. This results
in outstanding music education for all children. Music
education is indispensable for the neurological development of
students. As a representative stated, "When
you invest in culture, it always comes back, always." Compare this
to California where the present curriculum is test driven and narrowly
focused.
Education in New Zealand
The Picot Commission was set up by the
New Zealand government in 1987. At that time schools came under
different school districts based on different local authority areas,
something akin to the USA system. The Picot Commission recommended
doing away with this structure. Each school
was to be community based and have its own charter. It was to be run by a Board of
Trustees (usually five) each of which had to be a parent of a child
attending that particular school together with the Principal and
a trustee elected by the school staff.
The Board could co-opt other persons to the Board on a temporary
basis if they required certain expertise. The Board establishes
a Charter, a type of contract where the Board undertakes to the
Minister to take all reasonable steps to administer the school
in accordance with the purposes contained in the charter. Boards
are required to update their charters annually and also to provide
annual reports on how well they have achieved against their charter
goals and to account for their spending of public money.
Teachers' salaries would still be paid on a national basis through
the Ministry of Education. Educational Review Officers (EROs) were
established (something akin to Her Majesty's Inspector of Schools
in the UK) to oversee the whole system. School districts and numerous
layers of administration became superfluous, including about half
the Ministry of Education which no longer exists. The savings were
given to schools directly for them to spend as they saw fit. For
example, they could hire (together with other schools if this was
appropriate) whatever consultants they needed on a needs basis.
The New Zealand Ministry of Education issues a set of national
administration guidelines that provide a framework within which
school boards need to operate. It also has a national qualifications
system and it was agreed that a national examination structure
should still exist for students reaching the end of high school.
Even today, when most of the
developed world is obsessed with testing students of all ages,
the New Zealand Ministry of Education fully appreciates that
learning patterns can be different. "Successful
outcomes for all students require a range of learning pathways.
One size does not fit all. Children arrive at school with different
early childhood experiences and different levels of development.
How students learn, the pace at which they learn and their interests
vary between individuals. These differences are recognized, to
an extent, through the current system. This gives teachers and
schools responsibility for organizational and teaching decisions
and through provision for immersion learning and designated character
schools. However, the current system needs to continually look
for ways to provide flexible pathways, especially for learners
with diverse needs." Ministry of Education, Statement
of Intent, 2003-2008, Building Learning Pathways.
Education in Scotland
Recently the Scottish education minister
Peter Peacock publicly declared that league
tables belonged to a "past time" and
were now "meaningless." He stated, "League
tables owe their origins to a time past when the political currency
was about competition between schools and about designing a system
at a time when competition would be one of the main features of
education. We are not in that situation now. I believe in universal
excellence in schools and we should not have to have a league table
to try and choose a school." A spokesperson for the Scottish
Executive added that the reforms that were being developed would
mean the end of current league tables which are based only on higher
results, and do not take into account schools' other achievements.
She said, "Exam results only measure one part of the school's
performance. He [Mr. Peacock] wants to provide more relevant information
to parents... He wants to change information available to parents
and make it more meaningful."
Education in Australia
State education ministers have warned they
will block any move to rank schools' performance, declaring that
league tables are "inappropriate" and
must be banned. At a political showdown of education ministers
in Sydney on 25 April, the states forced federal Education Minister
Brendan Nelson to cancel plans to implement tests that would lead
to the ranking of schools.
Education
in Wales
A study commissioned by the Welsh assembly
suggests that the key stage tests at 11 and 14 are counter-productive,
with students focusing on passing the tests rather than fully
embracing subjects.
The study recommends that the tests should
be phased out. The devolved assembly has already put a stop
to testing at seven.
The Scottish parliament has also dropped the tests.
Meanwhile, Mary Bousted, general secretary of
the Association of Teachers and Lecturers, said: "Where Wales has gone,
England should follow. Teachers do not
need to test children at 11 years of age to know what standards
they have achieved or where they need to go next in their learning. "England
is now the only country in the UK to continue with the path
of testing to destruction - it needs to stop and quickly."
Professor Richard Daugherty, who was commissioned to undertake
the review, said the assessment arrangements in Wales must meet
the needs of young learners at "this crucial stage in their
development. What the review group has proposed is to use evidence
from assessment to inform key decisions that face individual pupils
and their parents. Our proposals would also ensure that we can
continue to track trends and patterns of achievement across the
system in Wales."
The Welsh education minister, Jane Davidson, said: "The group
presents some very important recommendations for dealing with this.
I shall be considering the final report with great care, taking
account of the advice I have received from ACCAC [The Qualifications,
Curriculum and Assessment Authority for Wales] on the review of
the national curriculum and assessment more generally. I shall
make a full statement on my conclusions before the summer recess." Education
in England: Members
of Parliament recommend "Change way schools are judged."
"The Government was today urged to immediately overhaul
the way it judges the performance of schools. An influential committee of MPs said their ratings
would be dramatically altered if they took into account other factors
beyond the schools' control. It said parents
would be given a far better picture of a school's performance
if those factors - such as economic and social deprivation -
were taken into account; and it called for such information
to be made available to parents for all schools next year. When such factors
are taken into account some schools move from the bottom of the league table
to near the top.
The House of Commons committee of public accounts
has looked into the way the Department for Education and Skills
measures and reports the performance of maintained secondary
schools. The committee said it was not only educational factors
that affected schools' performances. The National Audit Office
has demonstrated how the impact of external factors can be measured
and analysed to give a clearer indication of the quality of education
provided by different schools.
The committee said such information would be
valuable to policy-makers and to parents choosing schools for
their children. It said the Department
for Education and Skills should identify which external factors
have a significant bearing on academic achievement and take them
into account when assessing the performance of all schools - not just maintained secondaries.
Adjusted performance measures have shown that specialist, faith,
beacon and single sex schools outperform others. The committee
said the strengths of these schools, such as a strong set of
values and ethos, should be promoted across all schools. The
schools' inspectorate Ofsted should identify where a school ranks
in terms of academic achievement before and after taking account
of external factors.
Education
in England: Teachers poised to boycott pupil tests
Recently a survey was organized for the main teachers' union
by Sean Neill of the Institute of Education at Warwick University.
Commenting on a recent international evaluation of testing Neill
stated, "Though the effect of continued testing is to raise
test standards, some of this effect can be attributed to increasing
familiarity with the test methods by both teachers and learners,
increasing emphasis on preparation for the tests, and instruction
specifically focused on the predicted outcomes of the tests." He
found that teacher assessment was seen as a viable alternative
to tests by 85% of the respondents.
Subsequently the National Union of Teachers
(NUT) polled its members in England and Wales (the Scottish system
is separate and different.) The survey found that according to
teachers, "Compulsory national
tests for schoolchildren are an unnecessary and stressful burden." Only
6% of teachers thought the tests were a reliable way of evaluating
pupils' achievements. There was strong support for a boycott
of the tests with teachers preferring to assess pupils themselves.
The NUT's general secretary of the union, Doug
McAvoy, said, "This
survey underlines the strong criticisms teachers have of these
tests. They narrow education, limit use of
professional judgment, place unnecessary stress on pupils and add
significantly to the workload of teachers without producing any
benefits." Some
anonymous comments from teachers were included in his report. "Raising
standards can effectively be done in schools with good monitoring
and self-evaluation practices," said a primary school leader.
Another, teaching infants, said tests "rule" all teaching
in a school where children come from poor backgrounds. They need
enrichment far more than brighter children from more educated families,
yet they get less. Save money from SATs and give us support and
resources to improve standards."
More than eight in 10 of the
30,500 teachers surveyed for the NUT (91% of primary teachers,
and 85% of secondary teacher) felt tests were stressful to children.
Some 90% of teachers felt the tests diminished pupils' access
to a broad and balanced curriculum. The survey showed substantial support for a ballot by the NUT to
boycott the tests. The majority of respondents - 67.9% - had more
than 11 years' experience in teaching. Most were in England, 4%
in Wales. About 57% were in primary schools.
Conclusion
The situation where students achieve the highest competencies
is where teachers are given a good professional training and their
teaching is empowered. Perhaps it should be incumbent on administrators
to examine student achievement in countries where students outperform
those of the USA and which have different administrative systems. We
find two countries whose students out-perform those of the USA,
possess quite different education administrative structures to
those of the USA. In fact, we find that nationally and statewide
the USA has been moving for some considerable time in the opposite
direction to those of Finland and New Zealand. We also find that
Scotland is now moving away from league tables, Wales will almost
certainly follow, Australia has refused to implement them, and
that teachers in England are seriously considering boycotting
tests.
Empower teachers, make education
a cooperative venture between parent and teacher, make schools
community based, eliminate tests particularly for pre-high school
students, remove school districts and layers of bureaucracy,
invest in music and art - these are the ingredients for achievement
and for well balanced and attaining adults. Please appreciate this is not about money.
Education spending per capita on school age children is as follows:
Finland $4800; New Zealand $2806; UK $3329; USA $6043. Project fifty years in the future and which countries will
be in ascendancy and which in decline? The evidence speaks for
itself.
Dr. David L Mollet has experience of education and
teacher training on three continents namely Europe, North America
and Australasia. He now works as an education consultant in California.
He is available for presentations, workshops, seminars and consultancy.
His writings can be viewed at http://members.cox.net/tei .
He can be contacted at tei@cox.net
On a personal note: I was a Senior
Lecturer of Education in the UK in 1980, and after eight years
of trying to make some sort of contribution to change, I knew the
politicians hold on education decision making was set in concrete
. Sadly it is even worse today. In 1981 we set up home in California
and I found the system here even worse.
Eventually we moved
to New Zealand. I gave a presentation to the District Inspector
for South Island two weeks after we arrived. I guess what I said
must have made some sort of sense because much to my astonishment
she phoned me two weeks later to say she had arranged for me to
fly to Wellington to give a presentation to the top officials in
the Ministry of Education and possibly to meet the Minister. The
presentation went quite well and I thought that was that. This was
a time of great change in New Zealand and the next year it was announced
that a Commission (the Picot Commission) was to be set up to examine
the administrative structure of pre-tertiary education in New Zealand.
I made a detailed submission along with
hundreds of other people. I guess many of us were on the same wavelength
because when the Commission submitted its report to parliament
it recommended the changes I have described above. Parliament voted to implement the report and the changes occurred in 1988/89. In essence all
school districts and their attached layers of bureaucracy were
done away with, and all schools were to be community based and run
as a cooperative venture between parents and teachers. Naturally I was very pleased and hopefully I made some sort of contribution to the process. We returned
to California in 1995 but, if anything, I have found the situation
worse than I did in the early 1980s. Tragically I find the situation
here in San Diego the worst I have experienced in the developed
world.
I have spent my working life trying to improve the education that
children receive. At present I spend my time writing on education
matters trying to make some sort of contribution to
halt this immense socialization of educational ideas that is occurring
through the USA at this time. I believe, particularly for elementary school
children, that teaching is an art not a science and we are harming
and damaging a whole generation of children due to these hardened
ideas.
|